Andhra Pradesh Court April 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Syed Habeeb and ors. Vs. the Chief Judge, City Civil Court and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT153
ORDERNeeladri Rao, J.1. All the petitioners herein are working as sweepers, Scavengers and water women in the office of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. In pursuance of G.O. Ms. No. 233, F&P; (F.W. PRC III) Department, dt. 19-3-1983 all these petitioners on completion of five 'years of service were given remuneration of Rs. 290/- per month with usual allowances like HRA etc., as were admissible. The pay-scales of the A.P. State Government employees were revised with effect from 1-7-1986 as per G.O.Ms. No. 288, F&P;, d. 17-11-86. The revised scale of pay of Rs. 740-15-950-20-1150 corresponds to pre-revised scale of Rs. 290-5-345-10-425. As per G.O.Ms. No. 233/F&P; (F.W. PRC III) dated 19-8-1983, the monthly remuneration was fixed at Rs. 290/-as it was the lowest in the pre-revised pay scale of Rs. 290-425. As the lowest of the corresponding revised scale was Rs. 740/- the City Civil Court had drawn the emoluments of these petitioners at the rate of Rs. 740/- per month with othe...
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Its Secretary, Education Dep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT240
Jagannadha Rao, J. 1. This writ appeal is preferred against the judgment of the learned singe Judge in W.P. No. 12558/90 dated 27.11.1990. The learned single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the 1st respondent herein viz., St. Anthony's Educational Society, Narasaraopel. The appellants in this appeal are the Government and the Director of School Education. The relief claimed in the writ petition was for the issue of a writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the Government in G.O. Rt. No. 636 Education (EE-2) Department dated 17.4.1990 as arbitrary and illegal and for a consequential direction to the appellant to grant permission to the writ petitioner society to start a College of Education at Narasaraopet for the academic year 1990-91. 2. The following facts have to be stated : Initially the writ petitioner filed an application on 24.9.1988 seeking permission to start a College of Education for the academic year 1988-89, before the Chief Minister, Government of Andhra Pradesh....
Gorripati Ekambaram Naidu and ors. Vs. Pathipati Krishnaiah Naidu and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT483
ORDERSubhas Chhaganlal Pratap, C.J1. Refusal by the trial Court to condone two days delay in filing an application to set aside the Order of dismissal of the suit for default has resulted in this revision petition by the plaintiffs.2. Hearing counsel on either side and going through the impugned order, it does appear that the plaintiffs were not diligent in prosecuting their suit. The question, however, ultimately boils down to whether there was sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing the application in question. And on that ground the plaintiffs-must be held to have made out sufficient cause for condonation. That the plaintiffs previously were not diligen in prosecuting the suit proceedings can have but extremely limited relevance in consideration whether delay of bare two days should or should not be condoned. The trial Court has been carried away mostly by the previous conduct of the plaintiffs than by the paramount question whether the plaintiffs had or had not made out...
M/S. Ajay Constructions and Etc. Vs. Kakateeya Nagar Co-operative Hous ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-1991
Reported in: AIR1991AP294
ORDERSardar Ali Khan, J.1. These two Writ Appeals, viz., W. A. No. 811 of 1989 and W.A. No. 1338 of 1989, are directed against an order of a learned single Judge dated 25-4-1989, made in W.P. No. 1070 of 1989.2. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in both the Writ Appeals, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.3. The array of the parties is given as mentioned in the Writ Petition so that there may not be any confusion while referring to any of the parties.4. The first petitioner is Kakateeya Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Habshiguda; the second petitioner is one Sri R. Sadasiva Sarma, who is a Professor living in the same area; petitioners 3 and 4, Dr. Ramesh V. Bhat and Sri B. S. Narasinga Rao, are Scientists; the fifth petitioner Sri B.N. Mohan is an Engineer and the sixth petitioner, Sri T.V. Malleswara Rao, is an Industrial Consultant, On the other side, thefirst respondent is the Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Secretary, Muni...
Sanjaya Sales Corporation Vs. Dy. Cci and E
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT255; 1994(48)ECC130; 1994LC302(AP); 1992(57)ELT579(AP)
1. In this Writ Petition the petitioner-firm questions the action sought to be taken by respondents 2 and 3 in respect of two additional import licences bearing Nos. 3234621 and 3234622 of the approximate value c.i.f. Rs. 21,45,90,506/- and Rs. 27,06,24,648/- respectively, both dated 19-7-1990, issued to the 1st respondent for import of goods allowed in Para 220(2), (4) and (7) of Import & Export Policy, (Vol. I) 1990-93 subject to the conditions laid down therein, and seeks a Writ of Certiorari for quashing notices of the 2nd respondent issued in F. No. Engg/9/Add. Lic/TH/AM 91/REP. II/Hyd., dated 27-8-1990, F. No. Engg/8. Add. Lic/TH/AM. 90/REP. II/Hyd., dated 27-8-1990 and No. Engg/89/ADDL. Lic/TH/AM. 90/REP. II/Hyd., dated 4-9-1990 and consequential direction to the 2nd respondent, his agents, officers and subordinates to forbear from cancelling or in any way rendering ineffective the said two additional import licences. Before going into the questions raised in this Writ Petition,...
Rekulampati Mohan Reddy Vs. Gangavaram Thirupathi Reddy and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT275
N.D. Patnaik, J.1. Respondents 1 to 4 in this case who are accused of the offence punishable Under Section 302 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code in S.C. No. 114/89 in the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mahaboobnagar were released on bail. The charge-sheet in that case was filed by the 5th respondent i.e. Inspector of Police, Wanaparthy and it was committed for trial to the Sessions Judge. The petitioner, who is the de facto complainant filed an application in Crl.M.P. No. 228/89 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Mahaboobnagar to cancel the bail granted to respondents 1 to 4 Under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissal that application on two grounds-that the petitioner has no locus standi to file the application and that there are no merits in that case. This revision case is filed against the said order by the de facto complainant. 2. The first and main question which arises for consideration in this case is whether...
G. Krishnam Raju Vs. K.A. Parvathi and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT127; 1991CriLJ2601
ORDER1. The is an application by the sole petitioner in the writ petition for taking action under the Contempt of Courts Act, for deliberately violating the order of this court dated 29-11-1989 in W.P. No. 18475/1988. The sole respondent in the writ petition is Sri Padmavathi Mahila Viswavidyalayam, Tirupati, represented by its Registrar. It is useful to extract the entire judgment and also to notice that it has become final as no appeal or review petition has been filed : 'The sole petitioner seeks a direction in the nature of mandamus against the 1st respondent-University to appoint him as a Superintendent in its service from the date he was selected. The 2nd respondent who is a lady working in some other Institution, has been appointed on deputation as Superintendent. The petitioner holds a M.Com. Decree from S.V. University and a Post-graduation Diploma in Public Administration. He has passed both Typewriting and Shorthand (Higher Grade-English) and has been working in Sri Venkates...
N.S.R. Krishna Prasad and Etc. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement Loknayak ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1991
Reported in: 1992CriLJ1888; 1992(57)ELT568(AP)
Ramanujulu Naidu, J.1. These two petitions are filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of writs of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate writs or orders or directions forbearing the respondents from violating the personal liberty of the petitioner in writ petition No. 3103 of 1991 and the husband of the petitioner in writ petition No. 3104 of 1991, by using in any manner, the statements recorded from the petitioner in writ petition No. 3103 of 1991 on 13-8-1989, 14-8-1989 and 15-8-1989 and the husband of the petitioner in writ petition No. 3104 of 1991 on 4-8-1989, 5-8-1989 and 7-10-1989, for the purpose of launching any prosecution or penal action under any enactment or enactments in force. 2. In connection with an occurrence that took place on 4-9-1989 at Guntur, a container consigned in the name of 'Southern Agro Agencies' and received at the Inland Container Depot, attached to the Collectorate of Customs, Guntur, contained, on thorough inspection by the officia...
T. Ali Akbar Vs. the Labour Court and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT418
ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. The petitioner, who worked previously in the service of the A.P.State Road Transport Corporation, was removed from service on grounds of misconduct. The appellate authority confirmed the punishment. The Labour Court, Anantapur to which the matter was referred by G.O. Rt.No. 190 Labour, Employment, Nutrition & Technical Education (Lab.I) Department, dated 1-2-1985, also declined to interfere with the order of punishment. He, therefore, filed the present Writ Petition seeking a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the award passed by the Labour Court, Anantapur in I.D.No. 72 of 1986 dated 12-5-1986 and quash the same, with a consequential direction to the Depot Manager, APSRTC, Atmakur to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits.2. On 9-1-1983, the petitioner was on duty as Conductor in respect of the APSRTC Vehicle APZ 2217 on the route Atmakur to Yerramatam village. There were 156 passengers in the vehicle; it was over-crowded and ...
N.S.R. Krishna Prasad Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1991
Reported in: 1994(51)LC170(AP)
Ramanujulu Naidu, J.1. These two petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of writs of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate writs or orders or directions for bearing the respondents from violating the personal liberty of the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3103 of 1991 and the husband of the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3104 of 1991, by using in any manner, the statements recorded from the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3103 of 1991 on 13.8.1989, 14.8.1989 and 15.8.1989 and the husband of the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3104 of 1991. On 4.8.1989, 5.8.1989 and 7.10.1989, for the purpose of launching any prosecution or penal action under any enactment or enactments in force.2. In connection with an occurrence that took place on 4.9.1989 at Guntur, a container consigned in the name of 'Southern Agro Agencies' arid received at the Inland Container Depot, attached to the Collectorate of Customs, Guntur, contained, on thorough inspection by the of...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »