Andhra Pradesh Court February 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam and Another Vs. Bihar Alloy St ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-1991
Reported in: AIR1991AP331; 1991(1)ALT582
ORDERUpendralal Waghray, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the respondents 2 and 3 in the writ petition viz., Visakhapatnam Port Trust (hereinafter referred to as 'Port Trust') and its Traffic Manager against the Judgment of the learned single Judge allowing W.P. No. 15897/1986, D/- 5-12-1986 filed by four petitioners viz., (1) Bihar Alloy Steels Limited (hereinafter referred to as Company); (2) a Principal Officer and Shareholder of petitioner No. 1 -- Company; (3) M/s. Sarat Chatterjee & Co., (snipping agents of the Company) and (4) a Director of the said shipping agent. The 1st respondent in the writ petition is the Union of India, Ministry of Surface Transport, which is also impleaded as a respondent in writ appeal. No relief is granted against the 1st respondent in the writ petition. The parties are referred to according to their rank in the writ petition. The 1st petitioner is a Public Limited Company, which has a Mini-steel Plant at Patratu near Ranchi for manufacturing special allo...
P.T.V. Ramanujachari Vs. Giridharilal Rathi and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT10; [1992]73CompCas421(AP)
N.D. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioner who is the accused in C.C. No. 372 of 1990 in the Court of the IV Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, has filed this petition under section 482, Criminal Procedure Code, to quash the proceedings. That case was filed on a complaint instituted by the first respondent under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The allegations in the complaint in brief are that the petitioner who is the accused therein had given a cheque in favour the complainant on March 31, 1990, on the Canara Bank, Sultan Bazaar, Hyderabad, for an amount of Rs. 5,45,000 and when the complainant presented the cheque to his bankers for collection, the said cheque was dishonoured by the Canara Bank. The complainants has issued a notice as required by section 138(a) of the Negotiable Instrument Act and though the accused received the notice, he did not send the amount but sent an untenable reply. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner (accused) has stated that the petitioner opened...
Bora Bhaskara Reddy and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)ALT144
N.D. Patnaik, J.1. In this case, the Additional Public Prosecutor attached to the Court of the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, has authorised Sri S.L. Prasad, Additional Public Prosecutor of another Court, to conduct the prosecution in Sessions Case No. 17 of 1990 on the file of the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam. The accused has filed a memo in that Court objecting to the prosecution being conducted by Sri S.L. Prasad. The learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, has stated in his order dated 11-10-1990 that, in view of the memo filed by the Additional Public Prosecutor and a petition by the advocate for the accused, the memo is closed. This revision case is filed against the said order.2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that when there is a Public Prosecutor attached to the Court of the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, he alone shall conduct the prosecution in the cases arising in that Cour...
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Sri Venkateswara Trading Co.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)ALT624; [1991]83STC220(AP)
Yogeshwar Dayal, C.J. and Upendralal Waghray, J.1. This batch of tax revision cases and filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh under section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter called 'the Act') against a common judgment of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal dated August 18, 1988, by which it has allowed several appeals filed by the assessees. 2. The controversy is about the rate of tax on 'ravva' made from rice for the period prior to the amendment of the Act by Amendment Act 18 of 1985. It is common case that such rice has not suffered sales tax but whether paddy from which it was extracted has suffered tax under the Act or not was considered irrelevant by the authorities. The facts in T.R.C. No. 26 of 1990 arising out of the Tribunal Appeal No. 264 of 1985 pertaining to the assessment year 1981-82 are considered as illustrative of the controversy. The assessing authority, viz., the Commercial Tax Officer, has brought to tax such 'ravva' under item 144(a) of...
The A.P. Non-govt. Retired Teachers Association Rep. by Its Secretary ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-18-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)ALT688
A. Lakshmana Rao, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the teachers who were employed in the schools run by Aided Managements as well as Local Bodies and retired from service prior to 1st April 1973 are entitled to the same pensionary benefits as are extended to those who retired from service on or after 1st April, 1973.2. This appeal is preferred by the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 16686 of 1984 having been aggrieved by the dismissal of the writ petition. The first appellant herein is the Andhra Pradesh Non-Government Retired Teachers' Association and the other two appellants are the members of that association who had retired from service as Headmasters prior to 1st April 1973.3. The State Government made Andhra Pradesh Liberalised Pension Rules, 1961 and they came into force from 1st April 1961. They were made applicable to all the Government servants.4. With a view to improve the conditions of service of teachers employed in the schools run ...
Sri Rajah Pid Naik Vs. the Special Dy. Collector-land Acquisition Offi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-18-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)ALT701
ORDERSivaraman Nair, J.1. Petitioner is the son of Rajah of Shorapuram in the erstwhile Nizam State with the status of Sahebjang Bahadur Balmat Mulkimdar of the Nizam of Hyderabad. The estate was performing certain religious rituals in the Tirumala Devasthanam. On 16-2-1934 an agreement was drawn, detailing the services and religious rituals to be rendered by the estate which included-1. Nitya Kalyana Mangala Haratis-22. Nitya Navaneeta Harati-13. Milk-1/2 ser.4. Akhand ghee-1/2 ser.5. Yearly supply of Saree and a Ravika to Ammavaru at Tiruchanur.6. Silk Navar for the cot.7. Mukhamal bed and 2 pillows.8. Mosquito curtain.9. Silver throne, Golden Hamsa Vahanam, Silver Cot and Chair, Charriot Mantapam, Ghanta Mantapam and Nandanavana.These services were being conducted in Teru Mantapam and Ghanta Mantapam located near the temple. It is the case of the petitioner that these services were inextricably connected with these mandapams and that they are being conducted even now. The 1st respon...
Venkateswara Talkies Vs. Appellate Deputy Commissioner and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-15-1991
Reported in: [1992]193ITR746(AP)
I. Panduranga Rao, J.1. This revision is filed by the assessee under section 9D of the Andhra Pradesh Entertainment Tax Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), challenging the order dated October 19, 1990, of the Entertainment Tax Appellate Deputy Commissioner passed in Appeal No. R-4 of 1990-91 relating to the assessment for the quarters ending June 30, 1984, to March 31, 1986.The brief facts leading to the filing of the above revision petition are as follows : 2. The petitioner is an exhibitor of films at Pithapram, East Godavari District, paying tax under section 4(1) of the Act. The petitioner field returns before the Entertainment Tax Officer for the quarter ending June 30, 1984, to March 31,1986. The petitioner filed a revision alleging that, after filing the returns, no communication was received by him regarding the assessments; that no show-cause notice or any notice of other nature was received by the managing partner; that he was under the impression that the retur...
Sri Venkateswara Talkies Vs. Entertainment Tax Appellate Deputy Commis ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-15-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT312; [1992]85STC178(AP)
Immaneni Panduranga Rao, J.1. This revision is filed by the assessee under section 9-D of the Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), challenging the order dated October 19, 1990 of the Entertainment Tax Appellate Deputy Commissioner passed in Appeal No. R-4/1990-91 relating to the assessment for the quarters ending June 30, 1984 to March 31, 1986. The brief facts leading to the filing of the above revision petition are as follows : 2. The petitioner is an exhibitor of films at Pithapuram, East Godavari District, paying tax under section 4(1) of the Act. The petitioner filed returns before the Entertainment Tax Officer for the quarters ending June 30, 1984 to March 31, 1986. The petitioner filed the revision alleging that after filing the returns no communication was received by him regarding the assessments; that no show cause notice or any notice of other nature was received by the managing partner; that he was under the impression that the...
T.M. Asilamani Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Its Secretary, Civil Supp ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-15-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT283
ORDERRadhakrishna Rao, J.1. This writ petition is filed by a fair price shop dealer questioning the endorsment of the Joint Collector, Krishna, dated 6-10-1990 rejecting the appeal petition filed by the petitioner as time barred and to quash the same by issuing a Writ of Certiorari. 2. The petitioner was originally appointed as a fair price shop dealer for Nunna Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, by the Sub-Collector, Vijayawada, through his proceedings dated 22-2-1987 under the provisions of the A. P. Scheduled Commodities (Regulation and Distribution by Card System) Order, 1973. While so, the Mandal Revenue Officer issued orders on 14-9-1989 suspending the petitioner as dealer. Aggrieved against the said order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Chairman of the Zilla Abhivrudhi Sameeksha Mandali. The Chairman of the said Mandali allowed the appeal of the petitioner and directed the Civil Supplies authorities to issue necessary quotas for distribution after setting aside the ord...
Shaik Ameer Johni Vs. Shaik John Ahmed
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-15-1991
Reported in: 1991(2)ALT449
ORDERImmaneni Panduranga Rao, J.1. The defendant preferred this revision against the reversing judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge in CMA No. 28 of 89. The respondents who are the plaintiffs 1 and 2 in the suit filed IA No. 571 of 89 in OS No. 78 of 89 on the file of the District Munsif's Court at Ponnur for temporary injunction alleging that the property belongs to Khairunnisa Bee, the mother of the first plaintiff and the defendant, (the first plaintiff and the defendant being brothers), that The first plaintiff got the property under Ex. AI gift deed dated 22-10-88; that even by the date of Ex. AI, the second plaintiff was cultivating the suit land as a tenant and that as such, the plaintiff's are in Possession and enjoyment of the suit property by the date of the suit. 2. The defence of the defendant is that there is no necessity for Khairunnisa Bee to lease out the suit land when her children who are capable of cultivating the land are available, that she gave the land on le...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »