Andhra Pradesh Court October 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Murali Krishna Reddy Vs. District Educational Officer and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-11-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT233
ORDERIyyapu Panduranga Rao, J.1. This writ petition is filed for the issue of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or direction calling for all the records connected with, the proceedings in Rc.No. 151/83/85-2 dated 24-2-1989 issued by the third respondent (hereinafter referred to as the impugned proceedings) and to quash the same to the extent of reducing the basic pay of the petitioner from Rs. 900/- to Rs. 700/- per month, as illegal, improper, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice.2. Most of the facts which are not in dispute are the following: The post of the Head-Master of Munnalal Sanskrit Patashala, Secunderabad fell vacant and consequently the second respondent-Correspondent of the said institution issued a notification calling for applications from the qualified candidates for the post of Head-Master in the columns of Deccan Chronicle in the month of February, 1984. The petitioner and 3 others applied for the said post and there was an intervi...
The Tirupati Real Estate Agents Vs. the State of A.P. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-11-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT674
ORDER1. In this writ petition, the competence of the Tirupathi Urban Development Authority, to insist upon intending sellers of Lands which form part of 'development area' within the meaning of A.P. (Urban Area) Development Act, 1975, to ensure compliance with the conditions of layout and also to levy external development charges in respect of that area, is questioned.Sri P. Ramachandra Reddi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that except development charges not exceeding rupees forty thousand per hectare as prescribed under Section 28 of the Act, the Tirupathi Urban Development Authority, has no power to levy or collect any other charges and that laying of roads, laying of electrical lines as also laying of lines for purpose of sewage and other amenities shall be provided only by the Tirupathi Urban Development Authority, from out of the development charges collected.Sri Gopal Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Tirupathi, Urban Development Authority, ho...
S.S. Sudhakar, Minor, Rep. by His Natural Father and Guardian, Mr. S. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-10-1991
Reported in: 1993(1)ALT393
P.L.N. Sarma, J.1. As all these writ petitions are inter-connected, they are disposed of by this common judgment.2. Entrance test for admission into Medical and Engineering colleges was held in the State of Andhra Pradesh in June, 1991 under Rule 6 of the Andhra Pradesh Engineering and Medical Common Entrance Test Rules, 1985. The .Above mentioned rules were issued in exercise of rule-making power under Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983 (Act No. 5 of 1983).3. The petitioners herein sought admission to the Medical and Engineering Colleges in the State of Andhra Pradesh from the open competition - they do not belong to any of the reserved categories. The results were published on 26-6-1991. Except the petitioner in W.P.No. 10194 of 1991, none of the petitioners in other writ petitions could get admission. The petitioner in W.P.No. 10194 of 1991 is prosecuting the writ petition in the hope that if...
Ponnavolu Sasidar Vs. Sub-registrar Hayatnagar, and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-1991
Reported in: AIR1992AP198; 1992(1)ALT49
ORDER1. The action of the Sub-Registrar, Hayatnagar, Rangareddy District the 1st respondent in not registering the sale-deeds dated 1-8-1991 executed in favour of the petitioners by the General Power of Attorney holders of the owners of the land and in keeping the registerations pending on the ground that the documents do not bear sufficient stamp duty, is being challenged in this batch of writ petitions.2. The subject-matter of conveyance in the sale-deeds in these writ petitions is parcels of vacant land ranging between two and half acres and three acres situate in Survey Nos. 8 and 9 of Mansoorabad village, Saroornagar Mandal of Rangareddy District. In the documents the land sought to be transferred is described as agricultural land. The sale price mentioned in the document is Rs.65,000/- per acre. According to the petitioners, when the sale-deeds were presented for registration on 1-8-1991, the 1st respondent refused to register the same and informed the petitioners that as per the...
Kollipaka Srinivasa Rao Vs. the State, Sho
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT1
Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. It is the case of an young lady about 21 years old who, within two years of her marriage, died. The death is suicidal in nature and it has been established by the medical evidence also. Charges were framed under Section 306 and 498A IPC. A-1 to A-7 were faced with trial. To prove the prosecution case, P.Ws. 1 to 16 were examined and documents, Exs..P-1 to P-9 were marked . The learned Additional Assistant, Sessions Judge, Vijayawada who has got the opportunity of observing the demeanour of the witnesses and who has got an opportunity to read to the contents of the documents, came to the conclusion that A-1 alone can be convicted and the rest of the persons can be acquitted. Accordingly, A-1 was found guilty of the offence under Section 498A IPC and sentenced him to undergo RI for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-; in default to suffer SI for 20 days and to undergo RI for a period of four years and shall also to pay a fine of Rs. 300/-; indefa...
Majji Narayana Rao Vs. Sri Gowth Shymasunder Shivaji and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT5
Neeladri Rao, J.1. This election petition was filed by one of the candidates who contested from No. 2 Sompeta Assembly constituency in the elections held in November, 1989. Besides the petitioner, R.1 and R.2 herein contested from the said constituency and R.1 was declared elected. The election of R.1 was challenged inter alia on the grounds that the elections were not free and fair and the electorate could not exercise their electoral right and the right to vote was totally throttled, and booth No. 99 Pidi Mandasa, booth No. 89 Ambugam, booth Nos. 91 and 92, Tallabhadra, booth No. 90 Ambugam Bodduluru, booth No. 109 Kantragada, booth Nos. 63, 64, 65 and 66 Mandasa, booth No. 88 Lohari Banda, booth No. 87 Dunnuru and booth No. 153 Sariapalli were captured and the votes were rigged and polled by impersonation. It was also alleged that the S.I. of Police Mandasa abused his power and committed various irregularities which materially affected the election and the election is vitiated. It w...
M. Somaiah Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT464
ORDERRadhakrishna Rao, J.1. The petitioner faced the trial before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate for an offence Under Section 193 IPC. The principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases forwarded a complaint alleging that the petitioner gave false evidence before the Court and thereby he is guilty of the offence Under Section 193 IPC. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner gave a report to the Director, ACB, Hyderabad, against the Sanitary Inspector of Warangal Municipality, alleging that he demanded illegal gratification from him. A case was registered on the complaint given by the petitioner and the said Sanitary Inspector was trapped with the assistance of the petitioner herein, on 4-3-84. On 8-2-84 the petitioner also gave a statement Under Section 164 Cr.P.C. before the XVI Metropolitan Magistrate which is marked as Ex.P-1. During the trial of that case in CC.9/ 87 filed against the Sanitary Inspector, the petitioner-accused was examined as P.W.1. In his deposition as ...
M/S. United India Insurance Co. and Etc. Vs. Shaik Saibaqtulla and Oth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-1991
Reported in: AIR1992AP124; 1991(3)ALT400
ORDERD.J. Jagannadha Raju, J. 1. Thisappeal is filed by the third respondent, the Insurance Company, in M.O.P. No. 14 of 1984 on the file of the First Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Visakhapatnam. In an accident that took place on 17-7-1983 at about 8-30 p.m. near C.R. Reddy Square, Waltair, Uplands, the petitioner in the O. P. was injured as result of which he received several injuries and a total dislocation of the left hip-joint. He claimed a compensation of Rs. 3,40,000/-. The Tribunal, after considering the entirecase, awarded Rs. 3,30,000/- as compensation with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the application with a direction that, Rs. 7,500/- paid as interim compensation should be deducted from the amount payable. Aggrieved by the same, the Insurance Company filed the present appeal.2. In this appeal Sri S. Hanumaiah, thelearned counsel appearing for appellant-respondent No. 3, contends that the Tribunal committed a mistake in awarding R...
Coromandel Fertilisers Ltd. Vs. C.T.O., Company Circle, Punjagutta Div ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-1991
Reported in: 1992(1)ALT327; [1992]85STC212(AP)
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in these writ petitions is : 'whether the petitioners, manufacturers and/or dealers of cement, are liable to pay arrears of difference in sales tax for the period during which the concessional rate of sales tax granted by the Government was in force ?' 2. To appreciate this question, the relevant facts may be noticed. Under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short 'the State Act') as well as the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (for short 'the Central Act') cement is taxable. The Government of Andhra Pradesh in exercise of their power under section 9 of the State Act granted reduction in the rate of sales tax to the manufacturers of cement in Andhra Pradesh by issuing three orders. In G.O.Ms. No. 76, dated January 24, 1987, rate of sales tax was reduced to 4 per cent on cement sold to Government and Government companies. In G.O.Ms. No. 77, dated January 24, 1987, the rate of sales tax was reduced to ...
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Chundi Subba Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-1991
Reported in: 1992(3)ALT57
Radhakrishna Rao, J.1. A complaint has been lodged by the petitioner in the revision petition with the Station House Officer, Ongole II Town Police Station, against the accused which ultimately resulted in filing a charge-sheet by the Police against the accused-respondent under Sections 493, 494, 496 and 420 IPC before the II Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Ongole. The learned Magistrate after due enquiry and after considering the evidence of the complainant and other witnesses, found that no case has been made out against the accused for the offences with which he was charged.2. The case of the complainant who is examined as P.W. 1 is that the accused married her on 24-12-1985 at a Sivalayam, Inamanamellur village, in the presence of P.W. 2, Sunkara Surna Bala, Puripaka Shanmugam and Puripaka Srilakshmi. They were living as husband and wife at the residence of the complainant at Thangalla Khasim Street, Ongole. While so, it is the case of the complainant, that the accused made her to part wi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »