Andhra Pradesh Court July 1990 Judgments

State Bank of Hyderabad Vs. Bairi Lingam

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Lakshmana Rao, President: 1. In all these Appeals in which State Bank of Hyderabad Raikal Branch is the appellant, as common question arise for consideration, they are disposed of by a common order. 2. Having been aggrieved by the common order dt. December 23, 1989 passed by the District Forum, Karimnagar in Consumer Dispute Nos. 18 to 38 of 1989 directing the opposite party. State Bank of Hyderabad, Raikal branch to sanction loan of Rs. 25,000/- to each one of the complainants, these appeals have been preferred. 3. The respondents in all these appeals are weavers by profession. They are residents of Raikal village, Karimnagar district and are members of Backward Class. They had worked for some time on powerlooms in Bhivandi, Maharashtra State. They had returned from Bhivandi to their native place due to some trouble at Bhivandi. It is stated that all of them are poor, unemployed persons. Having come to know that the Government was granting loans to poor unemployed persons for installa...

M/S. Santosh 70 Mm Abids, Hyderabad, Rep. by Its Partner Mrs. Zameerun ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1991AP28

ORDER1. These two writ petitions are connected and can be disposed of together.2. Heard the learned Government Pleader: The facts in the cases being similar it will be sufficient to refer to the facts in W.P, No. 10253/90.3. The petitioner is a threatre located in Hyderabad city, on 10-4-90 two shows in the morning and the matinee could not be held due to Telangana Bundh in the twjn cities. The petitioner therefore thought of taking advantage of the provisions of S. 19,A of the A.P. Entertainment Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the notifications issued by the Government in G.O-Ms. 'No. 752 Revenue dt. 4-7-85. Accordingly, the petitioner submitted an application for exemption from payment of entertainment tax in respect of the said two shows. The application was submitted to the Entertainment Tax Officer on 11-4-90. Inasmuch as under the G.O. the said application has to be accompanied by a certificate issued by the Commissioner of Police, the petitioner applied to the l...

B. Rosaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1991CriLJ189

ORDER1. This is a petition filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against A-2 in C.C. No. 335 of 1985 on the file of the II Addl. Judicial Ist Class Magistrate, Nellore. 2. A-2 was a spectator to a video film exhibited by A-2 and A-42 in a parlour on 1-10-1984 at 11-00 p.m. on suspicion, when police raided the parlour, the film was found to be a 'blue film' of obscene nature. A-2 to A-41 Were the spectators of the film. A-1 was operating the video film while A-42 was the owner of the video parlour. The show was stopped and all the accused, A-1 to A-42 were charge-sheeted, A-1 and A-42 under sections 292, 293 and 294 I.P.C. and A-2 to A-41 under Section 292, 293 and 294 r/w 109 IPC. The allegation is that A-2 to A-41 had abetted the offence. 3. The learned counsel Sri Pattabhi, submitted that nowhere it is alleged that the petitioner has either exhibited, or arranged exhibition of the blue-film so as to reflect complicity of the petitioner in the exhibition of the blue...

K. Satyavathi Vs. Regional Director, Employee State Insurance Corporat ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (1992)IILLJ594AP

ORDER1. The writ petition is filed for a direction to the first respondent to make payments of Gratuity, Group Insurance, General Provident Fund, Pension and Co-operative Society Benevolent fund benefits to the petitioner as well as to the second respondent in accordance with Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act of 1956. 2. The relevant facts are as follows : The petitioner is the mother of one K. V. V. Satyanarayana and second respondent is his widow. Shri K. V. V. Satyanarayana was working in the office of the first respondent as Upper Division Clerk and he has put in a service of about 12 years. He submitted a nomination on August 21, 1977, in Form IV nominating his mother, the petitioner herein, for the benefits under the Central Government employees Insurance Scheme etc. While so, he married second respondent in October 23, 1985. Subsequently, by a letter to the first respondent dated October 28, 1985 Shri K. V. V. Satyanarayana requested to include the second respondent's name a...

Nav Bharat Corporation Vs. Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1991]72CompCas518(AP)

1. In this case, the court is called upon to examine the question of availability of judicial review of the administrative action of a public company, limited by shares and registered under the Companies Act, in awarding a contract. 2. At the commencement of hearing of this case, Dr. Singhvi, learned counsel for the first respondent, raised a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the writ petition. It would be appropriate to state briefly the factual context in which this question has arisen. 3. The first respondent, a company registered under the Companies Act, issued a tender notice inviting tenders for freight, forwarding, port clearance, over dimensional consignments (for short,'ODC') transportation and site handling. The petitioner, a partnership concern, and the second respondent, a private company registered under the Companies Act, are among the tenderers. The first respondent accepted the tender of the second respondent and awarded the contract to it. Complaining ...

Tekumalla Muneiah and ors. Vs. Chittari Babunuri Ammanamma and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1991CriLJ548; I(1991)DMC379

1. This is a petition to quash the order dated 21-11-1989 passed in Crl.M.P. No. 2610 of 1989 in C.C. No. 35 of 1987 on the file of the IInd Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nellore, as confirmed by the Sessions Judge, Nellore, by his order dated 18-1-1990 in Crl.R.P. (C.F. No. 1656/89). 2. The petitioners herein challenge the order of the Court below refusing to quash the proceedings on the ground that the trial Court at Nellore has no jurisdiction. 3. The facts of the case a are :- First respondent herein is the first wife of petitioner No. 1, and as the Ist petitioner married another wife, she filed a complaint in the Court of the IInd Addl. Judicial Magistrate of Ist Class, Nellore under S. 494, I.P.C for bigamy. The only ground raised by the learned Counsel for the petitioners is that the first respondent-wife was residing at Nellore even earlier to the alleged second marriage, and therefore, the Court at Nellore has no jurisdiction as per S. 182(2), Cr.P.C. to decide that c...

The A.P. Paper Mills Ltd. Represented by Its Vice-president, Sri A.L. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1991(2)ALT160

K. Amareswari, J.1. The petitioners seek for a review of the judgment of this Court in A.S. Nos. 2143, 2145 to 2159 of 1987.2. The proceedings arise under the Land Acquisition Act. An extent of 44 acres of land was acquired under 4 notifications for laying a pipeline and for storage of raw-materials for the Andhra Paper Mills Ltd. The Land Acquisition Officer passed 4 separate awards determining the market value of the lands at Rs. 11,000/- per acre under Award No. 1, Rs. 11,000/- per acre for some lands and Rs. 10,000/- per acre for some lands in Award No. 2, Rs. 11,000/- per acre Under Award No. 7 and Rs. 15,000/- per acre under Award No. 16.3. On a reference Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, the Civil Court awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 20/- per square yard which comes to Rs. 96,800/- per acre. Aggrieved thereby, appeals were preferred by the petitioners herein.4. The only contention raised in the appeals was that the market value fixed by the Court below is un...

Chimata Nagarathnamma Vs. Chimata Nathanail and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1990(3)ALT54; 1990(2)APLJ125; 1991CriLJ291; I(1991)DMC459; 1990(2)LS129

ORDER1. In this revision filed by the wife, the twin questions that arise are : (i) Whether the wife is entitled to invoke Section 125, Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance in a case where the husband fails to pay the monthly agreed amount under an agreement entered into between the parties for their living separately consequent upon certain differences that arose between them; and (ii) If the agreement entered into between the spouses for their living separately is committed breach of by non-payment of agreed monthly amount to the wife, whether the remedy open is only by way of a suit for specific performance of the agreement. 2. The facts of the case in brief are : The respondent is the husband of the petitioner herein. Their marriage as per Hindu rites took place on 4-5-1961. After the marriage they lived amicably for some time. Two female children were born to them. Thereafter, differences arose. Both of them agreed to live separately. An agreement (Ex.P. 3) dated 12-10-1971 was enter...

The Labour Endorcement Officer, (Central) Kothagudem Vs. V. Kaxma Redd ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1991CriLJ188

1. This is an appeal filed against an order of the Principal Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kothagudem. The Labour Enforcement Officer filed a complaint under section 22-A of the Minimum Wages Act for breach of rule 21 AA of the Minimum Wages (Central) Rules 1950 alleging that the accused failed to file annual returns before the concerned authority. 2. The learned Magistrate acquitted the accused holding that he has no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the complaint as the offence was committed in Warangal town. He passed the following order : 'Although the accused pleaded guilty, but at this stage when I have gone through the charge sheet it is noticed that the place of offence is at Warrangal. So this court lacks jurisdiction. The accused is acquitted'. 3. The learned Standing counsel for Central Government appearing for the appellant contended that if the lower court had no jurisdiction to take cognisance of the complaint, it ought to have returned the same for presentation to th...