Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court March 1990 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 05 1990

Sri Konaseema Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., Amalapuram and Another V ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-05-1990

Reported in: [1991]72CompCas588(AP)

ORDERJeevan Reddy, J.1. The issue before the Full Bench is whether a writ petition liesagainst a Co-operative Society, and if it doe's, in what circumstances? Context is the enforcement of bye-laws governing service conditions of employees.2. In P. S. Naidu v. Chittoor District Co,-operative Central Bank, (1977) 2 APLJ (HC) 282 : (1978 Lab IC 528), a Division Bench of this Court held that an order of punishment made by a Society against its employee cannot be questioned by the latter by way of writ petition. The Bench pointed out 'as far as this Court is concerned, it has uniformly taken the view that a writ petition does not lie against a co-operative society especially when it relates to matters concerning the Society and its employees. In C. V. Narasimha Naidu v. Chittoor District Co-operative Bank Ltd., (1971)2 APLJ (SN) 16 ('W.P. No. 3788/1970 dated 7-6-1971'), one of us (Kuppuswami, J.) following the decision of a Division Bench of this (Madras?) Court in Lakshmaiah v. Sri Perumb...


Mar 05 1990

All India Muslim Advocates Forum Vs. Osman Khan Brahamaini @ Basha and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-05-1990

Reported in: II(1990)DMC541

Sardar Ali Khan, J. 1. A Division Bench of this Court while dealing with the question of the right of a divorced woman to claim maintenance under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), has . referred the matter for the Full Bench on certain questions arising about the right of such Muslim Divorced Woman to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') from her former husband even after the enforcement of the aforesaid Act. The Division Bench felt that the matter involves substantial questions of law of general importance having a far-reaching effect and therefore it should be placed before a Full Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the matter. The questions to be considered by the Full Bench are as follows :(1) Whether a divorced Muslim Woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 of the Code from her former husband even after passing of the Act o...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial