Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court July 1989 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 04 1989

Khagesh Chandra Pradhan Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-04-1989

Reported in: 1992(2)ALT48

ORDERK. Ramaswamy, J.1. The petitioner while was working as Sub-Inspector, 2nd Battalion at Wokha, one Mr. V.D. Sahagal Commandant, 2nd Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force, Wokha, directed the petitioner to supply a radio set with wireless operator for convoy duties. The petitioner has disobeyed supply thereof. As a consequence, the Commandant issued Movement Order to move to RGS in 2nd Battalion. But he disobeyed that order also. It is also alleged that he behaved in an insolent and rude manner with Dr. P.N. Rao, Medical Officer, 2nd Battalion. Accordingly, Charge Memo was issued on March 18,1976. The petitioner has submitted his explanation and an enquiry officer was appointed. The enquiry officer after due enquiry, by his letter dated August 14, 1976 submitted his report stating that the charge No. 1 viz., refusal to supply radio set and wireless operator, has been proved; and Charge No. 3 has also been proved but with modification that the incident took place on November 28,197...


Jul 03 1989

Kalasami Venkanna and ors. Vs. the Secretary, Govt. of A.P. Forest Dep ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-03-1989

Reported in: 1992(1)ALT705

ORDERM.N. Rao, J.1. This batch of writ petitions relates to the validity of the order issued by the Divisional Forest Officer, Eluru directing prosecution of the petitioners for illicit encroachment of forest land and for raising cashew plantations in I.S. Jagannadhapuram village, hamlet of Ramasingavaram in West Godavari District. As all the writ petitions raise common questions of law and are interconnected, they are disposed of by this common judgment. The village, an estate, was taken over by the Government in 1950 under the Estates Abolition Act. The petitioners claim to be in possession of various extents of land in the village. It is their plea that in the year 1986, the forest officials for the first time claimed that the land is situated in reserved forest. They contend that applications filed by them under Section 63-A of the A.P. (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Coversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 are still pending before the third respondent, the Settlment Officer, Eluru...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial