Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court October 1989 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 05 1989

Andhra Pradesh Dairy Development Co-operative Federation Ltd. Vs. Shiv ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-05-1989

Reported in: (1992)ILLJ153AP

N.J. Patnaik, J.1. The writ appeals are filed against the judgment of a learned single Judge in W.P. Nos. 6720/84 and 13767/86. 2. The Andhra Pradesh Dairy Development Cooperative Federation Limited, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Federation'), is running a canteen for the workers employed in the factory and office establishment at Lalpet in Hyderabad. The petitioners 1 to 21 were working in the said canteen. They filed W.P. 6720/1984 for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Federation to treat them as employees of the Federation to fix appropriate regular sales of pay as applicable to the employees of the Federation. The other Writ Petition 13767/86 was filed by them challenging the illegal and unlawful termination of the petitioners with prayer to reinstate them into service with full backwages. The petitioners alleged in their affidavit that till 1977 the canteen was being run by a private contractor and afterwards it was run by the Federation itself under the supervision...


Oct 04 1989

Vajrakayala Ramani Vs. Sub-collector, Ramachodavaram and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-04-1989

Reported in: AIR1990AP271

ORDER1. After due enquiry, the authorities found that the petitioner belongs to 'Kapu' community and she does not belong to a Tribal Community. She claims that she belongs to 'Konda Dora' community, which is a tribal comunity, from the facts, i.e. the petition and counter, the allegation is that the petitioner belongs to Konda Dora community as she was born during the association of her mother with Vajrakayala Sriramulu, who is a Tribunal. The file has been perused by this Court. The mother of the petitioner gave a statement that she was deserted by her-legally wedded husband along with this girl and she came and stayed with Sriramulu. The statement of the mother clearly shows that at the time when she was discarded by her husband, the petitioner herein was aged about 3 months or so. When she was born during the wedlock with a non-Tribal and that the mother being a non-Tribal, it cannot be said that the petitioner is entitled to be treated as a Tribal. The statements given on oath in T...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial