Andhra Pradesh Court January 1988 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Apex Steel Re-rolling Mills Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-19-1988
Reported in: [1992]87STC32(AP)
K. Bhaskaran, C.J. and Anjaneyulu, J.1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents. 2. The submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the revision notice dated October 13, 1987, proceeds on the assumption that it is for the assessee to prove that raw material had already suffered sales tax. His submission is that the assessing authority proceeded after being satisfied that the raw material had already suffered sales tax. Inasmuch as it is only a notice, we do not think that at this stage we would be justified in interfering with the proceedings initiated by the first respondent, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Charminar Division, Hyderabad. It might be open to the petitioner to show that the purchases were from registered dealers whose identity could be established and that it is for them to pay the sales tax and not for the petitioner who made the purchases from the respe...
Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd. Vs. Mohamad Argobasi Enterpris ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-18-1988
Reported in: AIR1989AP286
ORDERSeetaram Reddy, J.1. The 2nd defendant, the revisionist herein, seeks to revise the orders passed by the trial Court. 2. The format in brief is that the plaintiff, the 1st respondent herein, filed a suit against the petitioner and the 2nd respondent-State Bank of Hyderabad. Eight issues have been framed based on the pleadings. One of the issues viz. issue No. 6 is whether the plaint has been, instituted by a person validly representing the plaintiff. It is not in dispute that the suit was instituted in the year 1982 and issues, were framed on 7-6-1983 and the suit was posted for trial on 4-7-1983. The suit was dismissed for default on 6-8-1983. Again it was restored and posted to Sept. 20, 1983, but from then onwards it was adjourned several times and eventually to 10-7-1984. On 16-10-1984 an interlocutory application was filed by the revisionist herein to try the preliminary objection pn issue No. 6. It was turned down by the trial Court stating inter alia as under: 'In the prese...
Boyapati Koteswara Rao and anr. Vs. Pappu Veeranna and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-18-1988
Reported in: AIR1989AP335
1. This is an appeal preferred jointly by the owner of the vehicle as also the Insurance Company questioning an award of Rs. 37,500/- made by the Court of Additional District Judge-cum-Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Krishna. The accident occurred on 21-4-1981 at Vijayawada and the respondent who was injured suffered a fracture on his left ankle. The respondent underwent treatment at Vijayawada and also at Madras, but he was, however, left with a permanent disability as he has to limp. On account of the said disability, the respondent who was a photographer by profession, suffered detriment and claimed damages. The respondent has a photo studio called Veeranna Studio at Vijayawada with a branch at Madras. It is stated that the studio is also engaged in producing documentary films for private and Government institutions which are exhibited in the cinema and the T. V. The respondent claimed a sum of Rs. 74,000/- as compensation and the Tribunal below awarded a sum of Rs. 37,5...
Dhronamrajti Satyanarayana Vs. N.T. Rama Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-1988
Reported in: AIR1988AP62; MANU/AP/0221/1988
K. Bhaskaran, C.J. 1. This is one of the extraordinary cases without any parallel., not a lis of the mundane orthodox pattern. but a unique public interest litigation which seeks to explore the realm of accountability of the executive to the people through the judiciary, hence it assumes great significance and has naturally attracted considerable attention of the public. 2. The petitioner, Sri Dronamrajii Satyanarayana, a public worker and the Organising Secretary of the Coastal Districts Congress-1 Committee of Andhra Pradesh filed four writ petitions :124ZS/87,124261/87. 12427/87 and 12805/87 in this Court on 24-8- 1987 alleging various violations of laws and constitutional provisions by Shri N. T. Rama Rao, the first respondent-Chief Minister, and the State Government, the second respondent. A common affidavit running into 193 pages was filed in support of the reliefs sought. He sought a writ of quo warranto in W.P. No. 12425/87 against the first respondent declaring that he was an ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›