Andhra Pradesh Court October 1987 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Vijayaraju Appalaraju and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-07-1987
Reported in: [1988]71STC248(AP)
Lakshminarayana Reddy, J.1. This second appeal is preferred against the decree and judgment passed in A.S. No. 76 of 1983 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Srikakulam. Defendants 1 and 2 in the suit are the appellants. The facts that led to this second appeal are as follows : The first respondent, herein, filed the suit O.S. No. 346 of 1978 on the file of the District Munsif, Srikakulam, claiming a sum of Rs. 2.900 being the value of 11 bags of rice seized from him by the defendants together with interest, other expenses and also damages. 2. The plaintiff is a dealer in rice and is having a valid foodgrains licence. His place of business is at Palasa in Srikakulam District. He sold 11 bags of rice on 7th February, 1978 to a dealer at Vizianagaram and the same was being transported from Palasa to Vizianagaram through M/s. Bharat Motor Parcel Service with necessary documents, viz., credit bill and way-bill. On the way, it appears, that the third defendant Commercial Tax Of...
Union Bank of India and anr. Vs. Sri Venkateswara Rice and Flour Mill
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1987
Reported in: [1991]72CompCas402(AP)
Anjaneyulu, J. 1. These two writ appeals can be disposed of together. The Union Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as 'the bank ') is the appellant. The respondent is a partnership firm carrying on the business of a rice and flour mill in Munnangivaripalem village in Guntur district. The respondent is registered as a small scale industry. For the purpose of its business, the respondent applied to the bank for the grant of a loan. The matter was negotiated and the bank agreed to advanced loans on different accounts. According to the agreement, the bank advanced loans to the respondent from time to time under various heads. It is said that amounts aggregating in all to about Rs. 18 lakhs were advanced by way of loans. The respondent failed to pay the instalments of loans taken as per the agreement. It would appear that the mill was not effectively running resulting in rescheduling of the repayment of the advances made by the bank and payable by the respondent in the respective accoun...
Owners of Ship Tiong Yung Vs. Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-1987
Reported in: AIR1988AP331
Upendralal Waghray, J. 1. Messrs South Fast Navigation Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) claiming to be the owner of the arrested ship TIONG YUNG have filed this appeal under Cl. 15 of the Letters Patent against the judgment and decree of the learned single Judge in CS.No. 1/1975.asuitfiledon the original side of this court. invoking the- Admiralty jurisdiction. 2. Messrs Shaw Wallace and Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs) have filed the said suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,83,227-04 as an action in rem f or arresting the said Ship impleading its owners and other parties interested. The suit claim comprised of two items : (a) Rs.43,000/- for necessaries supplied to the seized ship at Visakhapatnam., and (b) Rs.2,38,000/- for necessaries supplied to two other ships Timber. Leader and THAIYUNG when they had called at Madras Port earlier. According to the plaint, the Charterers of all the three ships were the same and the plaintiffs wer...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›