Andhra Pradesh Court August 1986 Judgments
indo National Ltd. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-22-1986
Reported in: [1987]64STC382(AP)
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. The question arising in this batch of tax revision cases and writ petitions is : under which entry in the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, do the 'dry-cells' fall 2. The petitioners are manufacturers of dry-cells. Dry-cells are used in torchlights, transistor-radios, electronic equipment, cameras, toys and so on. Until 1985 there was no separate entry in respect of dry-cells. Only by virtue of amending Act 18 of 1985 was entry 152 added, viz., 'dry batteries or cells'. All the present tax revision cases and writ petitions, however, relate to anterior period. 3. It would be appropriate in the first instance to refer briefly to the course of legislative development relating to these goods. 4. Until 1st September, 1976, on which date the amending Act 49 of 1976 came into force, there were two entries relevant for this purposes, viz., entries 3 and 38. They read as follows : -----------------------------------------------------------------...
Tag this Judgment!B. Premanand Vs. Satyasai Baba and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-08-1986
Reported in: 1987(32)ELT57(AP)
1. The petitioner claims himself to be a Rationalist. He states he is the Convenor of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of claims of the paranormal in India which Committee is engaged in dispelling the superstitious and blind beliefs gripping the society in India and the world. he also claims to be an author of various books and article concerning the cause of spreading rationalism and scientific temper. 2. The petitioner states that the matters raised by him in the present writ petition are in public interest. Commanding the writ petition for admission, learned counsel for the petitioner Shri. K.N. Balgopal stated that in urging the matters for consideration of this court the petitioner is acting bonafide with a view to vindicating the cause of justice and is not acting for any personal gain or private profit or out of any motivation or other oblique consideration. Learned counsel hastened to add that the petitioner has no ill-will against Sri Satyasai. Baba, first respon...
Tag this Judgment!B. Premanand Vs. Satya Sai Baba (Formerly Known as Satyanarayana Raju) ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-08-1986
Reported in: 1989(20)LC236(AP)
ORDERY.S. Anjaneyulu, J.1. The petitioner claims himself to be a Rationalist. He states he is the Convener of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of claims of the paranormal in India which Committee is engaged in dispelling the superstitious and blind beliefs gripping the society in India and the world. He also claims to be an author of various books and articles concerning the cause of spreading rationalism and scientific temper.2 The petitioner states that the matters raised by him in the present writ petition are in public interest. Commending the writ petition for admission, learned Counsel for the petitioner Shri K. N. Balagopal stated that in urging the matters for consideration of this Court the petitioner is acting bonafide with a view to vindicating the cause of justice and is not acting for any personal gain or private profit or out of any motivation or other oblique consideration. Learned Counsel hastened to add that the petitioner has no ill-will against Sri Saty...
Tag this Judgment!M. Anjaiah Vs. Praga Tools Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1986
Reported in: (1987)IILLJ78AP
1. The petitioner is seeking to quash the order dated February 14, 1986 dismissing him from service on the solitary ground that he was convicted by the X Metro-politan Magistrate, Secunderabad in S.T.C. No. 13 of 1986 dated January 7, 1986 for an offence punishable under Section 186 I.P.C. and Section 70-B of the Hyderabad City Police Act. The facts are not in dispute. 2. The petitioner has been working as Security Guard of the respondent. On December 24, 1985, during night time on the festive Christmas day, the petitioner in the company of his friends was found to have been drunk and was alleged to have beaten two persons. As a result, police charge-sheeted the petitioner for the offence of affray and on receipt of summons, to avoid protraction in the proceedings, he pleaded guilty and accordingly was convicted and sentenced to pay fine. On receipt of the order, the management of the first respondent, by he impugned proceedings and in exercise of the power under Clause 23(35) of the S...
Tag this Judgment!P. Mallesham and ors. Vs. Mohd. Yousuff
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1986
Reported in: 1987CriLJ1369
ORDERK. Ramaswamy, J.1. The petitioners herein arc the teachers. They filed this application against the respondent under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act (Act 70 of 1971), for short 'the Act', for wilful disobedience of the orders of this Court D/-19-3-1986 made in W. P. No. 2149 of 1986. They alleged in their affidavit and also stated in the evidence of the 1st petitioner examined today as P. W. 1 that on 12-5-1986 the petitioners went to the ! respondent and made a representation in writing that the orders of transfer may be implemented. Till 25-5-1986, the respondent took no action. On 26-5-1986, they again made another representation and no action was taken. On 3-6-1986 again, they went and made an oral request to the respondent. Yet, he did not take any action. Therefore, they issued a legal notice through counsel on 4-6-1986, requesting the respondent to implement the orders, or else it amounts to disobedience of the orders of this Court. Despite receiving the above repr...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›