Andhra Pradesh Court September 1985 Judgments
Ahdhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, Hyderabad and anr. Vs. Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-30-1985
Reported in: AIR1986AP317
K. Ramaswamy, J.1. The three appeals can be disposed of by a common judgment since they are founded on the same set of fact. The resopndent sued the appellants in O. S. No. 805/84 for delcaration that the demands by the appellants in thier letters Dt. June. 13, 14, 1984 for a sum of Rs. 1,78,89,986-90ps. And Rs. 94,36,000/- towards charges for consumption of electricity and additional deposit for consumption respectively, as illegal void and arbitrary and to restrain the appellants or their subordinates to enforce the said demands. O. S. No. 919/84 was laid for a declaration that the appellants are not entitled to issue bills for monthly consumption charges on the basis of normal tariff and to issue future bills at concessional rates and to restrain the appellants from collecting Rs. 26,94,745-42 ps towards the bills for the month of June 1984. Pending the suits, they filed I. A. No. 1529/84 in O. S. 805/84 which gave rise to C. M. A. No. 638/85 to issue an injunction restraining the a...
Tag this Judgment!R. Vendateswara Rao Vs. P. Vijaya Lakshmi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1985
Reported in: [1987]62CompCas429(AP)
Ramaswamy, J. 1. The appellant was travelling in lorry ADF 446 from Gudur to Nellore on July 16, 1980, and when the lorry reached a point near Spinning Mills is Dargamitta, Nellore town, an accident occurred in which the appellant sustained injuries. The appellant laid a claim under section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, for a compensation of Rs. 26,800. He impleaded the first respondent, the owner, and the second and third respondents, the insurance companies. He did not implead the driver as a party respondent. After framing fence has taken place as a result of rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry ADF 446. But, it found that the first respondent-owner expressly instructed the driver not to carry any passengers for hope or reward. Therefore, the owner is not liable equally since exhibit B- 1 policy does not cover the risk for passengers being carried in the vehicle. The third respondent with whom the vehicle was insured was found not liable. As a fact, it was f...
Tag this Judgment!R. Venkateswara Rao Vs. P. Vijayalakshmi and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1985
Reported in: I(1987)ACC487
K. Ramaswamy, J.1. The appellant was travelling in the lorry ADF 446 from Gudur to Nellore on 16-7 1980, and when the lorry reached a point near Spinning Mills in Dargamitta, Nellore town, an accident occurred in which the appellant sustained injuries. Then the appellant laid a claim under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act for a compensation of Rs. 26,800/-. He impleaded the first respondent the owner and the second and third respondents the Insurance Companies. He did not implead the driver as party respondent. After framing appropriate issues, the Tribunal below found as a fact that the occurrence has taken place as a result of rash and negligent driving of the driver of the lorry ADF 446. But, it found that the first respondent owner expressly instructed the driver not to carry any passengers for hire or reward. Therefore, the owner is not liable equally since Ex. B1 policy does not cover the risk for passengers being carried in the vehicle. The third respondent with whom the ...
Tag this Judgment!Koramsetty C. Venkateswarlu Vs. Syndicate Bank, Udayagiri and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-1985
Reported in: AIR1986AP290
Kodandaramayya, J.1. This appeal was referred to a Division Bench by Madhava Reddy , J., (as he then was) on 17-4-1980 on the question whether the loan contracted by the appellant-defendant from the plaintiff bank - Syndicate Bank carrying an interest of 121/1% p.a. and 21% p.a. in case of default by itself could be deemed to be excessive and usurious so as to attract the provisions of the Usurious Loans Act 10 of 1918.2. The 1st defendant is the appellant. The appeal is filed against the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 25/76 on the file of Subordinate Judge's Court, Kavali granting a decree for a sum of Rs. 16,020.60 ps. At 6% p.a. from the date of decree. The appellant raised two contentions before the single Judge who referred the case to a Division bench. The first contention is a sum of Rs. 10,000/- lying in fixed deposit in the plaintiff-bank should also have been adjusted towards the debt due and in any case the bank is bound to pay interest even for the period subsequent to th...
Tag this Judgment!B. Subba Rao Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-1985
Reported in: 1988(15)ECC117; 1988(18)LC445(AP); 1987(32)ELT648(AP)
P. Rama Rao, J. 1. This writ appeal at the instance of the writ petitioner is to quash the order of the Collector, Central Excise as confirmed by the Central Board of Excise Customs, New Delhi. 2. The Writ Petitioner, who was working as SAS Accountant in the Office of the Accountant General, Hyderabad, formed a Company known as 'The Khairatabad Ramprasad Khadi and Village Industries Association' under the Non-Trading Companies Act, 1962. It is stated that the Company consisted of seven Directors, and the Company was carrying on the business of manufacturing match sticks. A show cause notice dated 6.4.1972 was issued by the Collector, Central Excise to the Company as well as petitioner stating that on 20.10.1971, when the Preventive Officers of Central Excise visited the premises, they found (i) 213 bundless of safety matches containing 5 grosses match boxes, (ii) two gunny bags, one containing 30 grosses match boxes and the other 20 grosses match, boxe, (iii) 17.5 kgs. of Potasium Chlo...
Tag this Judgment!N. Haragopal Vs. T.T. Devasthanam and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-1985
Reported in: (1986)IILLJ278AP
P.A. Choudary, J.1. W.P. Nos. 8120 and 8121 of 1984 are filed for the issue of writs of Mandamus to direct Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam to interview the petitioners in those writs along with the candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange, Tirupathi for the post of Attenders without insisting upon the writ petitioners' names being sponsored by the Employment Exchange. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam notified 60 vacancies of Attenders to the Junior Employment Officer, Sub-Employment Exchange, Tirupathi. The qualifications prescribed are just ability to read and write Telugu. The devasthanam requested the Employment Exchange to sponsor candidates in the ration of 1 : 7. The total number of persons who are able to read and write Telugu and who came upto this standard and who were registered with the Sub-Employment Exchange, Tirupathi were at that time 11,939. Of them these petitioners were two. 2. The Sub-Employment Exchange, Tirupathi sponsored 200 candidates registered up to 17-10-...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›