Andhra Pradesh Court January 1985 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramakrishana Talkies Vs. Income-tax Officer, Vijayawada
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-19-1985
Reported in: [1985]153ITR794(AP)
Jagannadha Rao, J.1. This write petition mainly raises a question relating to the return of impounded account books and documents under s. 131(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. The Inspectors of Income-tax conducted a survey under s. 133A of the I.T. Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the Act, on April 18, 1984, and they listed various documents found in the cinema business premises of the petitioner. Summons were issued to the petitioner to produce the said listed documents and registers at the office of the responded on April 19, 1984. In response to the summons, the petitioner produced his account books on April 19, 1984, and on that day the respondent impounded the said books under s. 131(3) of the Act stating that there was variance between the daily collection reports given to the petitioner to the sales tax authorities and the collection reports given by the petitioner to the sales tax authorities and the collection reports given to the distributors of the cinema on various dates ...
K.K.R. Nair Vs. Managing Director, Food Corporation of India Head Offi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-19-1985
Reported in: (1986)ILLJ158AP
ORDER1. The petitioner was an employee of the Food Corporation of India (FCI, for short). He was appointed as Deputy Manager in FCI on 7th December, 1976. He was declared by the FCI to have competed his probation satisfactorily by an order passed by the FCI, on 21st December, 1977. The next event of importance for this case, which I should take notice, is the order of confirmation which was passed by the FCI on 24th January, 1978 with retrospective effect from 22nd December, 1977. Thus the petitioner has been working as a confirmed employee of the FCI. While he was working at Hyderabad, he had suddenly left his post of work on 15th August, 1981 to his native place in Kerala without obtaining prior approval from the Senior Regional Manager, Hyderabad. The petitioner says that, after he reached his native place he was taken to a hospital. On 18th August, 1981, he sent a telegram to the Senior Regional Manager requesting him to grant one month's leave with effect from 15th August, 1981. T...
United India Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Mowli Ba ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-19-1985
Reported in: I(1986)ACC433
1. The dissatisfied defendant-Insurance Company is the appellant. The respondent laid the suit to recover Rs.61,000/- comprised of Rs.40,000/- towards repairs and replacements for the damage caused to the motor vehicle AAT-2545, in an accident occurred on March 30, 1976 and Rs.21,000/- towards loss of profits during the interregnum. The trial Court decreed the suit for a sum of Rs.40,000/- towards repairs and replacements but disallowed the rest of the claim.2. The facts in a nutshell are that the respondent is the owner of the motor vehicle of 1963 model bearing AAT 2545. It was purchased by K.K.Swamy from the A.P.State Road Transport Corporation during the year 1973 from whom the respondent purchased for Rs.35,000/-. It was insured with the appellant for a maximum liability of Rs.40,000/- It sustained extensive damage in the accident and the respondent intimated the appellant of the estimated damage under Ex.B-1 and thereafter the appellants valuer DW 1 submitted his report Ex.B-11 a...
K. Sambasiva Rao Vs. P. Bangaru Raju
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-13-1985
Reported in: AIR1985AP393
1. Defendant in O.S. No. 703 of 1981 on the file of the III Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is the appellant herein. The respondent plaintiff filed the suit bearing O.S. No. 703 of 1981 for specific performance of the agreement entered into between the appellant and the respondent on 30-9-65 and for permanent injunction restraining the appellant and his men from interfering in any manner with one acre, out of the 13 acres of the plaint schedule land, which was the subject-matter of the agreement for sale by the appellant to the respondent, under the above referred agreement. The trial Court decreed the suit filed by he respondent and directed the appellant to execute a regular deed of conveyance in favour of the respondent in respect of one acre out of the 13 acres of the plaint schedule property, as per the said agreement dt. 30-9-65 within two months and also directed division of the plaint schedule land and delivery of one acre out of the 13 acres to he respondent. In ...
Angadi Chennaiah (A.1) and ors. Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-13-1985
Reported in: 1985CriLJ1366
ORDERLakshminarayana Reddy, J.1. The revision petition is directed against the conviction and sentence as confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur, in Criminal Appeal No. 301/80 dt. 21-4-1982 modifying the judgment of the Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Guntur, in S.C. No. 100/80. The revision petitioners are A1, A3, A8 and A9. The facts that led to this revision petition are as follows:S.H.O., Nagarampalem, filed a charge-sheet against these appellants and 14 others, for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 307, 324, 325, etc. It is alleged in the charge-sheet that on 8-12-1979, all these accused formed into an unlawful assembly, armed with deadly weapons like sticks, spears, axes, etc., and attacked P.W.I and others. The case was registered as Crime No. 262/79 P. S. Nagarampalem. The learned Magistrate, i.e., the Additional Judicial Magistrate of II Class, Guntur, committed the accused to take the trial under various sections of the Code to the Court of the Sess...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›