Andhra Pradesh Court August 1983 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kottapally Jaggaiah Vs. Kokumanu Venkatasatyanarayana and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-17-1983
Reported in: AIR1984AP149
1. The first defendant is the appellant. The suit was laid for settlement of accounts of the partnership dealings between the plaintiff and the two defendants. The allegation in the plaint is that the plaintiff and the defendants constituted a partnership firm and agreed to jointly carry on the contract work in 1965 for the maintenance work to be carried on from the mile stone 17/10 to 26/4 in Guntur-Narasaraopet road, that the contract work was taken in the name of the 1st defendant, that the plaintiff invested a sum of Rupees 11,000/-. While the 2nd defendant invested Rs. 3,000/-, and that it was agreed that the 1st defendant should be in the management of the work, maintaining regular account books and keeping the same for perusal and inspection for at all times. When the plaintiff demanded the 1st defendant to settle the account of the partnership and pay the moneys due to the partners, he refused either to show that account or settle same. Hence suit was laid.2. Sri Y. G. Krishnam...
Sri Venkateswara Rice Co. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-1983
Reported in: [1983]54STC271(AP)
Amareswari, J. 1. This tax revision case arises in the following circumstances : 2. The petitioner is a dealer in rice and groundnuts. For the assessment year 1975-76 the petitioner returned a net turnover of Rs. 5,83,060 and claimed an exemption of Rs. 7,91,732. On 24th July, 1975, the business premises of the petitioner was searched by the commercial tax authorities and certain variations were found in stock position with reference to the stock registers. The Commercial Tax Officer by his order dated 5th October, 1976, determined such total variations at Rs. 36,916 and added the same to the admitted turnover. After disallowing certain exemptions the net turnover was determined at Rs. 9,59,390. Subsequently the Commercial Tax Officer initiate penalty proceedings and by his order dated 6th June, 1977, levied penalty of Rs. 9,982 i.e., at five times the tax alleged to have been suppressed. 3. Against the said orders of the Commercial Tax Officer, the petitioner preferred two appeals bef...
Kesani Narayana and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-11-1983
Reported in: AIR1985AP64
ORDER1. The three petitioners seek a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order of the State Government in G.O.Ms.No.501, Revenue (UC.II) Department dt. 9.3.1983 granting exemption under S. 20(1)(a) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.2. Aedla Narayan Reddy, the 3rd respondent herein applied to the Government on 16-4-1981 for grant of exemption in respect of 4 acres 2 1/2 guntas of excess land owned by him situate at Nacharam in the vicinity of Hyderabad so as to enable him to sell it in favour of M/s Ramakrishna Cine Studio, the 2nd respondent herein. In the application it was mentioned that the 3rd respondent intends to develop a Horticulture Studio for out-door shootings. This land is an agricultural land situate adjacent to the land owned by the 3rd respondnet. The Managing Partner of M/s Ramakrishna Cine Studio , Sri N. Harikrishna, the 2nd respondent herein filed an affidavit that the land held by Narayan Reddy is adjacent to the plot of land owned by them, that the l...
P. Kondaiah Chetty and anr. Vs. Cheruva Venkata Subrahmanyam and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-11-1983
Reported in: AIR1984AP145
Raghuvir, J. 1. This appeal relates to a choultry in Ongole town run in the name of 'Ayyanna Chetty Choultry'. It is seen, in its name the founder's name is incorporated. The two grandsons of the founder, P. Kondaiah Chetty and P. Venkata Subbarayudu, obtained a declaration from the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments on Nov. 18, 1969 holding that the premises of the building is not governed by the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 17 of 1966 (the Act). Thereupon, a social worker, C. V. Subrahmanya Sastry, two persons, Shaik Abdul Manaf, Manthri Seetharamaneyulu, who described themselves as poor persons, two others, P. Ramaiah and Kadava Venkata Subbaiah, in all five, laid a suit to set aside the order of the Deputy Commissioner. In that suit, the two grandsons of the founder, were made parties. The case of the five persons is, the Choultry is a famous institution in Ongole and is governed by the provisions of the Act. The sui...
Sri Rama Krishna Rice and Groundnut Oil Mill No. 1 and ors. Vs. State ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-08-1983
Reported in: AIR1983AP383
ORDER1. The Government of Andhra pradesh introduced a scheme to supply rice to poorer sections of the society, at the rate of Rs. 2/- per Kilogram and in the interest of that scheme, issued certain orders restricting the export of rice outside the state and also calling upon the rice-millers and dealers in the state to sell a certain quantity of foodgrains with them, to the Andhra pradesh state civil supplies corporation. These orders are questioned in these writ pwtitions. The points raised in the batch of writ petitions are common. Though the prayer in the writ petitions calls in question the valdiity of Cls. 4-A 4-B and 4-c of the Andhra pradesh Rice procurement (Levy) and restriction of sale order, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Levy order), the said aspect was not urged before me. The arguments centred roung the interpretation of the various clauses, and the validity of the Government orders. In the light of the said Rules. For the sake of convenience I will set out the fac...
The Special Secretary to Government of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Vedakant ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-1983
Reported in: AIR1984AP5
Jagannadha Rao, J.1. The appellants are defendants 1 and 2. The Respondents are the plaintiff, 3rd defendant and the 4th defendant. The suit has been filed by the 1st respondent for recovery of the sum of RS. 2,34,750/- and subsequent interest and costs. The Court below granted a decree against defendants 1 and 2 to pay to the plaintiff the said sum of Rs. 2,34,750/- with subsequent interest at 6% P. A. on Rs. 2,25,000/- from 27-8-1974 on which date the suit was filed till payment and costs.2. The State of Rajasthan which is the 1st defendant sponsored a welfare scheme of State Lotteries and appointed the 2nd defendant, the Director of Small Savings as the Director of State Lotteries. The lottery tickets were being sold by the State of Rajasthan in most of the States in India though agents and sellers. The 3rd defendant, one. Banka Pydithalli is a resident of Vijayanagaram in Andhra Pradesh and is a dealer in lottery tickets under the name and style of Sri Venkateeswara Lucky Prize Cen...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›