Andhra Pradesh Court July 1983 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D.V. Raghavacharyulu Vs. Deputy Commissioner Endowments Department, Gu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-28-1983
Reported in: AIR1984AP39
Kodandaramayya, J. 1. The question raised in these proceedings is whether the authorities under S. 26 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act (17 of 1966) (hereinafter called the Act ) have the power to suspend a hereditary trustee pending disposal of charges framed against him and appoint a fit person to discharge his duties. It involves interpretation of S. 26 (1) and (3) of the Act read with the relevant provisions of the Act.2. The petitioner is a hereditary trustee of Sri Vallabharaya Swamy Temple, Gangipuram, Prathipadu Taluk, Guntur District by virtue of family succession. The claim of the petitioner's family as hereditary trustee was upheld by the Commissioner by order dated 23-7-1943 and since then they are functioning as such. After the death of the father of the petitioner viz. In the year 1968, the petitioner was recognised as hereditary trustee by order of the Assistant Commissioner dated 8-11-1968.3. under the impugend order da...
Devabhaktuni Kesavanarayana and ors. Vs. Challa Lakshmavadhani and ors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-1983
Reported in: AIR1984AP45
Jagannadha Rao, J. 1. The defendants 3, 6, 7 and 23 are the appellants in this appeal which is directed against the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 32/57 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada. The suit was originally filed in forma pauperis as O. P. No. 61/55 but later on the plaintiff paid the court-fee. Initially the mother of the plaintiffs represented them as their next friend but later the maternal uncle of the plaintiffs came on records as their next friend in the place of the plaintiffs' mother. They have since become majors. The suit was filed for partition of the plaint schedule properties into three equal shares and for division by metes and bounds and for allotment of two such shares to the plaintiffs free from the claims of the defendants and for a permanent injunction against defendants 2 to 5 restraining them from executing their decrees against the shares of the plaintiffs.2. The court below passed a preliminary decree for partition of the plaint...
Syed Viquar Mohd. Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyder ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-1983
Reported in: (1984)ILLJ123AP
ORDER1. This is an application for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to continue the petitioner in service as Superintendent of the Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University after declaring the proceedings No. 592/C3/1976, dated 28th June, 1979, issued by the respondent University as illegal and void and to grant all consequential benefits such as salary allowances etc., to the petitioner.2. It is alleged by the petitioner in this writ petition that he joined service as a Lower Division Clerk in the Technical Education Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh on 18th April, 1961, and was promoted to the post of Upper Division Clerk on 10th April, 1968. His services were regularised in the category of Upper Division Clerks with effect from 31st May, 1969 and the completed his probation on 31st August, 1969. 3. While he was working as Upper Division Clerk, the Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, hereinafter referred to as the 'University' was formed in the y...
C. Seethaiah Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-14-1983
Reported in: AIR1983AP443
K. Madhava Reddy, C.J. 1. This writ appeal is directed against the Judgment of our learned borther Ramanujulu naidu J. In WVMP 305 of 1983 vacating the interim suspension granted in WPMP 3430 of 1983 pending writ petition.2. The appellant herein seeks writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ to quash the order of Government of andhra pradesh in G.O. Rt. No. 383 revenue (H) Department dt 8-3-1983 by which the Government refused to interfere in revision with the orders of the commissioner land revenue and rejected the same.3. Due tot he death of the permanent village karnam a permanent vacancy of the Karnam's post of pavanivarikandrika village arose on 19-7-1977. A notification was issued calling for applications to fill up the said post on 10-11-1980. The appellant and the third respondent herein were the only applicants for the said post. On thedate when the vacancy arose the appellant who belongs to scheduled caste was aged 20 years and had studied 10th class. He underwent kar...
N. Sulochana Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-1983
Reported in: AIR1984AP173
ORDER1. The petitioner is asking for a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ or direction, directing the respondents to refund the sum of Rs. 75,934/- paid by her in pursuance of a surety bond executed by her. It is necessary to state a few facts, to appreciate the points raised herein.2. For the excise year 1958-59, the petitioner's husband, along with some other Nallagutta Sendhi Group of shops. The Sendhi Group comprised, among other a village called Sikh village. This village is said to have been withdrawn later from the group. Be that as it may, at the end of the excise year, a demand in a sum of Rupees 75,928/- was made by the Government upon the licensees.3. In September, 1962, auctions were held for the excise year 1962-63. The petitioner's husband, along with some other persons, happened to be the highest bidder in respect of musheerabad Sendhi Group of shops; but, the issue of licence was stopped by the Board of Revenue on the ground that the petitioner's husband wa...
The Food and Sanitary Inspector, Giddalur Panchayat Vs. Koppu Subbarat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-08-1983
Reported in: 1983CriLJ1801
ORDER1. The trial Court found the respondent to have committed an offence punishable under Section 16(1)(a)(i) and Section 7(1) read with Section 2(i) (a) and (m) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rupees one thousand and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a farther period of two months. On appeal, he was acquitted on the sole ground that the mandatory requirement of R. 18 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules has not been complied. Thus, the above appeal came to be filed. 2. P.W. 1, the Food Inspector of Gram Panchayat Giddalur, inspected the shop of the respondent at 4 p.m. on September 29, 1977 along with P.W. 3. He found the accused transacting the sale of articles of food. He also found a tin containing 5 K.Gs. of groundnut oil to be for sale. On inspection he suspected the ground nut oil to be adulterated. He purchased 375 grams of groundnut oil from the...
T. Sareetha Vs. T. Venkata Subbaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-1983
Reported in: AIR1983AP356
ORDER1. This civil revision petition is filed by sareetha, a well- known film actress of the south Indian screeen agianst an order passed by the learned subordinate Judge , cuddapah ,overruling her objection raised to the enter taining of an application filed by one venkata subbaiah, under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act) for restitution of conjugal rights with her.2. Sareetha while studying in a highschool and then hardly aged about sixteen-years and staying with her parents at Madras was alleged to have been given in marriage to the said venkata subbaiah, at Tirupathi on 13-12-1975. Almost immediately thereafter they were separated from each other and have been continuously living apart fromeach othe for these five-years and more. Venkata subbaish had, therefore, filed under section 9 of the Act O.P. No. 1 of 1981 on the file of the subcourt, cuddapah for restitution of conjugal rights with sareetha. Sareetha had taken a preliminary objection ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›