Andhra Pradesh Court September 1982 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Chinna Reddy and ors. Vs. N. Vidyasagar Reddy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-06-1982
Reported in: 1982CriLJ2183
ORDER1. Sri B. Subhashan Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioners, contends that when the petitioner-accused were granted anticipatory bail, the learned Magistrate cannot take them into custody at the time of committing them for trial to the Sessions Court. 2. The facts leading to this petition may be mentioned as follows : The first respondent gave report to the S.H.O. of Rural Police station, Nirmal, making certain allegations against the petitioners. The Sub-Inspector registered a case as Crime no. 50/1981 under sections 447, 324, and 326 IPC., against the petitioners. The Sub-Inspector also issued FIR and took up investigation. The petitioners apprehending that they would be arrested filed Cr. MP Nos. 586/1981 and 623/1981, in the Court of Sessions Judge for anticipatory bail. The learned Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail under S. 438 Cr.P.C. The Sub-Inspector after completing the investigation referred the case as one of civil nature. Aggrieved with the said orders of...
Kishore Boiled Rice Mill Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-03-1982
Reported in: AIR1983AP230
ORDER1. The petitioner who are all rice-millers/dealers in Prakasam district, are complaining that conditions 5 and 7 of the conditions of licence revived by the Government by its Memo No. 64132/Cs. 1/81, dated 27-11-1981 are operating as unreasonable restrictions upon the fundamental right of the petitioners to carry on business guaranteed to them by art 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and that they are not waranted by cl. (G) of art. 19.Clause 3 of the Andhra pradesh Rice procurement (levy and restriction on sale order 1967 provides that every miller carrying on rice milling operations shall sell to the agent or an officer duly authorised by the Government in this behalf at the notified price and at such percentage of the total quantity of each variety at the notified price and at such percentage of the total quantity of each variety of rice produced or manufactured by him in his rice mill every day as is specified for each district in the schedule. According to the schedule as...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›