Andhra Pradesh Court August 1981 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Fisherman Co-op. Society Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-31-1981
Reported in: AIR1982AP53
Alladi Kuppuswami, C.J. 1. We have gone through the judgement of Jayachandra Reddy. J. as well as the order of the Government which was challenged before him and we have no hesitation in holding that Jayachandra Reddy, J. was right in dismissing the writ petition.2. Mr. Mirza Munawwar Ali Baig has reiterated many of the contentions urged by him before Jayachandra Reddy. J. in the writ petition. The first submission is that the dispute was between the two co-operative societies viz., the appellant society of Edulabad village and the 4th respondent society of Yenkriyal village and such a dispute should have been the subject-matter of a reference under S. 61 of the A. P. Co-operative Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and the appeal against the order of the Assistant Director of Fisheries to the Director of Fisheries was not maintainable. It is, however, clear from S. 76 (2) r/w S. 16 (5) of the Act that the 4th respondent had a remedy by way of appeal against the order ...
S. Vs. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-28-1981
Reported in: (1982)IILLJ7AP
1. Under the order impugned herein, the Hindustan Aeronautice Ltd., has terminated the services of the petitioner by paying three months' basic pay in lieu of notice, as per paragraph 5 of the terms and conditions of appointment. According to the petitioner, the termination is really by way of punishment and that, the power sought to be invoked by the respondent-Corporation is not available to it, in the facts and circumstances of this case. A few facts which are relevant for the present purpose may be stated : The petitioner was appointed as a Medical Officer in the respondent-Corporation on 7th August, 1975. He was later confirmed in service and made permanent on 9th March, 1977. The order dated 9th March, 1977, stated, inter alia, that the petitioner will be on probation for a period of one year and that, during the probationary period, his services can be terminated without notice, without assigning any reasons and without any compensation in lieu of notice. It further stated : '.....
The Andhra Pradesh Football Association and ors. Vs. Kurnool District ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-28-1981
Reported in: AIR1982AP97
Amareswari, J.1. The parties appear to be more busy in fighting in Courts of Law than playing in Courts of Football. There were as many as 3 suits besides the petition under appeal not to speak of the numerous interlocutory applications and the appeals therefrom. It is not necessary to trace the entire litigation except to refer to one or two at the appropriate place.2. The respondent is the Kurnool District Football Association, a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act. It is affiliated to the Andhra Pradesh Football Association, Hyderabad, the first appellant herein. The appellant is a Society registered under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli, for short, the Act. Appellants 2 to 9 are the members of the Managing Committee of the State Football Association, elected in the year 1976 for a term of two years. Their term expired in 1978. No elections were conducted thereafter.3. The present petition O. P. No. 5 of 1981 was ...
T. Ramadevi Vs. T.V. Subrahmanyam
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-27-1981
Reported in: AIR1982AP10
ORDER1. This application is filed by a Hindu wife under S. 24 of the Civil P. C. to transfer her husband's divorce petition under S. 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act from the Court of the Additional District Judge, Cuddapah to the Court of the District Judge, Kurnool. The petitioner-wife and the respondent-husband are both well educated. The petitioner is a Graduate in Medicine and the husband is a Ph. D., of I. I. T. Madras. They were married in the year 1978 at Cuddapah and have a male child which is now nearly one year old. Even by the time of the marriage, the petitioner-wife is in Government service working at Kurnool and subsequent to the marriage the husband-respondent obtained employment in Brazil and is now staying in that country working there in a well-paid job. All seemed to be well. But fate seems to be cruel. While still working and staying at Brazil, the husband filed O.P. 54 of 1980 in the Cuddapah District Court seeking divorce from his wife. The wife seeks in the present ...
Kanuri Venkata Rangadass and ors. Vs. Kanuri Venkata Krishna Rao and o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-1981
Reported in: AIR1982AP60
ORDER1. The question that falls for determination in this revision petition is whether the case is governed by S. 34(1) or 34(2) of the Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act.)2. The plaintiffs who are the petitioners herein, filed a suit for partition of the properties described in the plaint schedules into three equal shares and for allotment of two such shares to them. They paid a fixed court - fee of Rs. 200/- under S. 34(2) of the Act. Thereafter at the time of the inspection of the Subordinate Court the District Judge pointed out that the first defendant in his written statement averred that he alienated items 2 and 3 of the plaint A Sch in favour of defendants 2 and 3 and as the first defendant purchased items 2 to 6 of the plaint B Sch. property with the joint family funds in the name of the second defendant, the plaintiffs have to pay advalorem court - fee under S. 34(1) of the Act. On that notice of theft check slip was issued and objections we...
Hindustan Machine Tools Workers Staff Union Vs. Hindustan Machine Tool ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-25-1981
Reported in: (1982)ILLJ178AP
1. The questions of law that arise in this writ petition are, (1) What is the meaning to be given to the words 'under the control of the Government of India' occurring in the provisions of some enactments and (2) Whether the meaning given by the Courts to the words 'under the Control of the Government of India' occurring in Article 12 of the Constitution of India, can also be extended to the provisions of other enactments containing the same words or whether an undertaking which is said to be 'under the control of the Government of India' for the purpose of Art. 12 can at the same time be held to be not 'under the control of the Government of India' for the purpose of those enactments. 2. The facts that gives rise to these questions are as follows : Elections for panchayat samithis in Andhra Pradesh were scheduled to be held on 9-6-1981. The Government of Andhra Pradesh exercising its power under S. 3(2) of the Andhra Pradesh Factories and Establishments (National Festival and other Ho...
A.N. Dyes Corporation Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-24-1981
Reported in: AIR1981AP386
Madhava Reddy, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ appeal is whether the exemption granted under Section 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') in respect of building bearing Nos. 3-4-249, 250 and 251 situated at Gunj Bazar, Secunderabad, is vitiated for non-observance of the principles of natural justice.2. The respondents herein purchased the building bearing the above numbers for a sum of Rs. 1 lakh. It is their case that they spent a sum of over Rupees 72,000/- for large scale improvements and alterations. It is their further case that they had purchased the building for their family business and for expansion of that business. At the time of the purchase, the tenants (writ petitioners) agreed to vacate the premises whenever the purchasers wanted. The respondents-landlords made substantial additions and alterations in the other portion and requested the tenants to vacate s...
Gram Panchayat, Mandapaka and ors. Vs. District Collector, W.G. Distri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-24-1981
Reported in: AIR1982AP15
Jeevan Reddy, J. 1. This writ petition has been referred to a Bench by Jayachandra Reddy, J., for an authoritative pronouncement on the scope of Section 85 of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayates Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). It arises in the following circumstances:-In Mandapaka village there is a small tank in R.S. No.111, with an extent of Ac.3-84 cents. According to the Gram, Panchayat, which is the writ petitioner herein, the tank is used for the purpose of drinking water, and fro cattle. The petitioner says that the village, which is having a very large Ayacut and population, exclusively depends upon four small tanks in the village for the supply of drinking water and fro cattle. By virtue of Section 895 of the Act, the said tanks, including the tank in R.S. No.111, according to the petitioner, vested in it, and the revenue authorities have no power or authority in law to assign any portion thereof to any one. In spite of the said legal position, the petitioner...
United India Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pallamparthy Indi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-21-1981
Reported in: [1983]54CompCas802(AP)
Chennakesava Reddy, J.1. These four appeals are spawned by a common order passed by the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore, in two applications, viz., O.P. Nos. 140 and 141 of 1977, filed under s. 110A of the M.V. Act, 1939. 2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to these applications are these : On April 6, 1977, at about 9.30 a.m. there was a motor accident on the Pennar Road Bridge near Nellore town involving the bus, APN 5938, and the scooter, AAU 889. P. Srinivasulu Reddy and his co-brother, P. Venkata Krishna Reddy, were going to Nellore on the scooter. Venkata Krishan Reddy was seated on pillion while Sreenivasulu Reddy was driving the scooter. When they were proceeding on the over bridge, the bus, APN 5938, owned by Challa Venku Reddy and driven by Shaik Peeran came from the opposite direction at a high speed. A row of bullock carts were passing in the same direction as the scooter towards Nellore. The scooter overt...
United India Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pallamparty Indir ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-21-1981
Reported in: AIR1982AP267
Chennakesav Reddy, J.1. These four appeals are spawned by a common order passed by the Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore in two applications O. P. Nos. 140 and 141 of 1977 filed under S. 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act. 2. The fact and circumstances giving rise to these applications are these: On 6-4-1977 at about 9-30 a.m. there was a motor accident on the Penner Road Bridge near Nellore town involving the bus APN 5938 and the scooter AAU 889. P. Srinivasulu Reddy and his co-brother P. Venkata Krishna Reddy were going to Nellore on the scooter. Venkata Krishna Reddy was seated on the pillion while Sreenivasulu Reddy was driving the scooter. When they were proceeding on the over-bridge, the bus APN 5938 owned by Challa Venku Reddy and driven by Shaik Peeran came in the opposite direction at a high speed. A row of bullock carts were passing in the same direction as the scooter towards Nellore. The Scooter overtook some of he c...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »