Andhra Pradesh Court January 1981 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T. Bhaskar Rao Vs. T. Gabriel and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-28-1981
Reported in: AIR1981AP175
ORDER1. In this revision the order passed by the Principal District Munsif in O. S. No. 350/78 refusing to admit the document sought to be received by the plaintiff on the ground that it was insufficiently stamped and unregistered, is challenged. The petitioner filed the suit O. S. No. 350/78 for recovery of possession of plaint 'A' schedule property measuring 0-49 cents. The plaintiff was examined as P. W. 1 and he tendered exchange deed dated 14-6-1958 in support of his case as to possession. The plaintiff wanted to prove that possession was delivered to respondent in pursuance of the document in question. According to the plaintiff, the first plaintiff purchased 'A' schedule property measuring 0-49 cents under a registered sale deed dated 6-5-1958 from the defendant and obtained possession in pursuance of the sale deed. At that time the defendant's father was in possession of 'B' schedule properly measuring 0.34 cents. The plaintiff and the defendant wanted to have exchange of these...
Poddar Projects Ltd. Vs. the Assistant Collector, Central Excise Iii D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-1981
Reported in: 1983LC2049(AP)
ORDERRaghuvir, J.1. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or orders and direct the respondents to act according to law laid down in Central Excise Notification No. 16/79 dated 20.1.79 and restrain from collecting excise duty on skull scrap, runners and raisers arising out of the manufacture of Steel ingots through the aid of electric furnace in the petitioner industry.2. This petition coming on Wednesday, the 21st day of January 1981, and Thursday, the 22nd day of January 1981, and this day on for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit therein, and the writ and Rule Nisi directed by the order of the High Court, dated 13.5.80 and made herein and the records submitted in pursuance thereof, and the counter affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. V. Jagannadha R...
Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Trustees of H.E.H. the ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-1981
Reported in: [1981]131ITR497(AP)
Kuppuswami, C.J. 1. The assessee is a public charitable trust created by the late Nizam by an indenture dated June 14, 1954, and is called 'H. E. H. The Nizam's Charitable Trust'. The objects of the Trust are charitable in nature and the Trust is a public charitable trust. 2. The procedure adopted in making disbursements to several donees is as follows : The trustees pass resolutions sanctioning payments to various donees. As soon as the resolutions are passed, the money is earmarked specifically for a particular purpose and for a particular donee. But it often happens that it takes some time before the actual disbursements are made and though the resolutions are passed during the accounting year, the amount is disbursed after the accounting year (which is the financial year) and as soon as the resolutions are passed, they are debited to the income and expenditure account and credited to the outstanding payment account which contains the amounts due to the various donees as per the res...
Prabhat Timber Depot and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-1981
Reported in: [1981]48STC159(AP)
Alladi Kuppuswami, C.J. 1. In this batch of writ petitions the main question for consideration is whether entry 145 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act (referred to in this judgment as the Act) is ultra vires and unconstitutional. 2. It is sufficient to state the facts in Writ Petition No. 3417 of 1977 in order to deal with the contentions raised by the petitioners in these writ petitions. 3. The petitioners in these writ petitions are dealers in timber. They usually purchase logs of timber from the forest department, saw or cut them into planks, rafters, beams, etc., and sell them. Under entry 63 of the First Schedule to the Act, sales tax is leviable on timber at the point of first sale by a dealer in the State. The commercial tax department took the view that the forest department was not a 'dealer' and they were, therefore, levying tax on the sales effected by the persons, who purchased timber from the forest department and sold the same on the ground ...
Neelam Wines Vs. Commissioner of Police, Chatta Bazar, Hyderabad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-1981
Reported in: AIR1981AP191
P.A. Choudary, J.1. The petitioner, under the name and style of M/s. Neelam Wines, desires to run a wine shop from a mulgi bearing Municipal No. 15-7-280 of Begum Bazar, Hyderabad. The proposed wine shop is only a place from where bottled liquor is to be sold. No liquor is to be consumed on the premises of the shop. For that purpose, the petitioner first obtained from the Excise Superintendent, Hyderabad District, an Excise Licence No. 39 dated 12-12-79 after paying a huge licence fee of Rs. 13,500. Next he had also obtained permission from the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad on 16-11-79 a 'No Objection' declaration from the landlady of the premises.2. Additionally, on 25-1-80 he applied to the City Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad for grant of a licence under the Hyderabad City Police Act. That application was rejected by the City Police Commissioner through his Memo dated 24-7-80. The petitioner now challenges in this writ petition the legality of that refusal order made by the C...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›