Andhra Pradesh Court August 1978 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Hemalatha Vs. R. Satyanandam
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP1
ORDER1. The petitioner applied in O. P. 12 of 1977 before the District Court, Warangal, under S. 10 of the Indian Divorce Act for divorce against the respondent. In the petition she stated that the marriage was solemnised on 11-5-1971 in the Indian Pentaowtal Church, Mill Colony, Warangal. The petitioner gave several instances when the respondent treated her with cruelty. It was stated that after an incident, which took place in the year 1973. the respondent never tried to take back the petitioner in spite of mediation by elders. The petitioner and the respondent are living in estrangement entirely due to the acts of the respondent. In the circumstances, it was stated that the respondent had treated the petitioner with utmost cruelty and had deserted her without any reasonable excuse for more than five years.2. The respondent filed a counter denying the allegations in the petition. He stated that the petitioner had herself deserted the respondent for no fault of his.3. The petitioner g...
Rudraraju Durgaraju and anr. Vs. Sagiraju Dadda Venkataraju and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-11-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP14
ORDER1. This revision by the plaintiffs under Sec. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order dated January 25, 1977 made in I. A. No. 599 of 1976 in A. S. No. 89 of 1970 on the file of the District Judge's Court, West Godavari at Eluru.2. Dismissal by the court below of a petition by the 1st petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C, seeking the amendment of the plaint is the occasion for the filing of the above revision petition.3. The 1st petitioner filed suit O. S. No. 71/67 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Eluru for a declaration of his title to the property in question and for injunction. He claimed the property under registered will dated January 19, 1981 (Ex. 1) executed by his maternal grandmother S. Bangarayya who died on September 4, 1961. Defendants 1 to 3 claimed reversionary rights in the property. 4th defendant is the mother at the 1st plaintiff. Defendants 1 to 3 contested the suit stating that Bangarayya has only a limited interest in th...
Suru Syamalamba Vs. Kinthali Polisetti and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP81
1. On, 21-7-1978 when this appeal was posted for hearing, Sri Ranganatham, the learned counsel far the appellant, was not present. There was no representation even. The respondent's counsel was present Hence the appeal was disposed of by me ex parte, having heard the counsel far the respondents. The appeal was dismissed. 2. Sri Ranganatham flied an application stating that he was not able to attend the Court. He, therefore, wanted that the ex parte judgment and decree passed by the High Court on 21-7-78 should be set aside, Sri Ranganatham explains that he was prevented from attending the Court by back-ache which persisted for a week. I accept the explanation offered by Sri Ranganatham that he was prevented by sufficient cause from attending the Court. I, therefore, feel it necessary to set aside the judgment rendered by me on 21-7-1978 and it is accordingly set aside The appeal. is, therefore, restored to file. 3. Then the counsel on both sides addressed arguments. Sri Ranganatham con...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Trustees of H.E.H. the Nizam's Dependan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1978
Reported in: [1983]139ITR517(AP)
Madhava Rao, J. Referred Case No. 59 of 1976 : 1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the request of the Commissioner referred the following two questions for decision : '1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, a valid trust was created by the Nizam in June, 1961, in respect of shares of the face value of Rs. 23,50,000? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the trust fund formed in June, 1961, was part of the trust formed earlier on August 12, 1957 ?' Referred Case No. 63 of 1978 : 2. The question referred in this is: 'Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee was not the owner of the shares of the face value of Rs. 23,50,000 in four limited companies for inclusion in his net wealth for the assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64 3. Referred Case No. 59 of 1976 relates to the assessment of the trustees of H.E.H. t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›