Andhra Pradesh Court October 1978 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Eenadu Press Workers Union and anr. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-27-1978
Reported in: (1979)ILLJ391AP
Alladi Kuppuswami, J.1. The first petitioner is the Union of Non-Working Journalists in ' Eenadu', the second respondent herein and the second petitioner is the Trade Union of Working Journalists in the State of Andhra Pradesh. In this writ petition the petitioners pray for the issue of a writ of certiorari to quash the order of the first respondent, the State of Andhra Pradesh in G. O. Ms. No. 716, Labour, Employment and Technical Education (Labour-1) Dept., D/1-7-1977. Under G.O. Ms. No. 715 of the same day the Government referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad, the dispute between the workmen and the management of 'Enadu'. 'Whether the demand of the workmen for enhancement of wages including D,A. for non-working journalists is justified ?' On the same day the Government also issued the impugned G.O. Ms. No. 716 under Section 10(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act prohibiting the continuance of strike by the workers which was commenced from 24-6-1977 and the loc...
K. Dharmagopal Rao and ors. Vs. the Special Deputy Collector, Land Acq ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-26-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP161
Madhava Rao, J.1. This is a petition filed for the issuance of Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to refer all the cases of the petitioners to the Civil Courts in accordance with the applications filed by them under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act I of 1894 (the Act).2. The facts are that the award was passed on January 27, 1976. The petitioners mere served with the notice of Board under Section 12(2) of the Act On February 9, 1976 The petitioners died their applications to refer the matter to the Civil Court under Section 18 of the Act on February 27, 1976. While issuing the notice under Section 12(2) of the Act, the Land Acquisition Officer has also forwarded what are called land compensation bills (L C. Bills) claiming the money from Pay and Accounts Officer. Thereafter. for period of nearly two years, even though the petitioners are persuading the first respondent to refer the cases to the Civil Court,...
Bondla Ramalingam Vs. Shiv Balasiddiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP180
ORDER1. This is a revision petition filed against the order of the learned District Munsif, Siddipet dated 27th July 1977 and made in G. F.R.No, 1238/76 in O. S, No.66 of 1976.2. The facts are that the petitioner filed a petition for setting aside an ex parte decree dated 8-3-1976 and filed an affidavit in support of the same. The office took an objection that there was delay in filing the petition and there fore, a separate application should be filed for condoning the delay and the petition was rejected The advocate represented the papers stating.'This petition is being filed from the date of knowledge of passing of the decree which is stated in the affidavit, as such no petition is necessary to condone the delay.'As a petition for condoning the delay was not filed, the papers were placed before the Court for orders. Thereafter, the Court passed the order under revision The Court heard the counsel for the petitioner and held that the petition cannot be admitted as it is barred by lim...
Chakrala Venkateswaralu Vs. Golla Anjaiah (Died) L.R. Golla Kondiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP162
1. The appellant in C.M.A. No 382/1977 is the petitioner in C. R. Ps. 2231/76 and 219/77 He is the decree-holder in O. S. No 69/1964 a the file of the Subordinate Judge Kavali.. An extent of 62 cents was purchased by the 5th defendant from the plaintiff's ancestor. 5th defendant sold it to 16th defendant under a sale deed The petitioner (appellant) filed the suit O. S. No. 69/64 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge Kavali against defendants 5, 16 and the other defendant Possession and profits in respect of A schedule property. That suit was decreed. After the decree was passed on 13-3-1967. 16th defendant issued a registered notice though his Advocate on 5-7-1967 informing the decree-holder that he is accepting the decree dated 13-3-1967 and hence he is notable for profits. 5th defendant along with some other preferred appeal A.S No.1/1968 While A S. No. 1/1968 was pending, the petitioner decree-holder filed I. A No. 232/67 for ascertainment of mesne profits. Ultimately, the appeal wa...
Tentu Lakshmi Naidu Vs. Vaisreddi Verda Rama Rao and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1978
Reported in: AIR1980AP62
ORDER1. The sole petitioner in the Election petition died on 21st July, 1978. By order dated 24th July, 1978 the Election petition was held to have been abated. The office was directed to caused the publication to be made in two daily newspaper and the state Government Gazette. The two daily newspaper are Enaadu of Visakhapatnam edition and Indian Express of Vijayawada edition in which the directions contained in sub-section (3) of section 112 of the Representation of the people Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) were published. The present petitioner in Application 111 of 1978 happens to be an elector in the 12 Therlam Assembly constituency and registered elector at serial number 779 of 1977 of the Elector al Roll of Therlam Assembly constituency, part 47, Mugunda village. He is, incidentally also the son of the deceased in Election petition 9 of 1978. The petitioner filed the above Application to permit him to be substituted in the place of the deceased and continue the proceed...
Syed Zaleel Zare Vs. P. Venkatal Muralidhar and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP107
ORDER1. This revision petition gives rise to a short but interesting question with regard to the property to be excluded for the Purpose of determining the means of the plaintiff to pay the requisite court-fee. The defendant has preferred this revision petition against the order of the III Additional Judge, Secunderabad, whereby he granted leave to the plaintiff to file the suit in forma pauperis. 2. The plaintiff laid the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 37,050/- towards past mesne profits, with future mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 100/- per day together with future interest and for possession of the suit premises. The plaint allegation is that the defendant is the tenant of the suit premises with a monthly rent of Rs. 550 whose period of lease expired by 31-12-1973 and therefore he is a tenant by sufferance. The case of the defendant appears to be that he has a right of renewal from time to time. The three plaintiffs filed in forma pauperis the earlier suit, O. S. No. 414/1969 fo...
Koduru Sriganga Reddy and ors. Vs. the Commissioner, Endownments Depar ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP73
ORDER1. An interesting question of law is raised in this writ petition. It is whether the term of 'non-hereditary trustee' appointed by the Deputy Commissioner under Sec. 15 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious institutions and Endowments Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is to be reckoned from the date of their appointment or from the date when they take the oath of office and secrecy. 2. The petitioners along with two others were appointed as 'non-hereditary trustees' of Sri Udayakaleswaraswami, Venugopala and Lakshminarasimhaswamy temples of Gondavaram Village in Kovur Taluk, Nellore District by the Deputy Commissioner Endowments Department, Kurnool, by his proceedings dated 20th Sept. 1974 for a period of three years from the date of his order. Under the same proceedings. the Deputy Commissioner also directed the trustees to assemble in the office of the Executive Officer of the temple on 4th Oct. 1914 to take oath of office and secrecy before they en...
Kilari Mammi and ors. Vs. Barium Chemicals Ltd. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-1978
Reported in: AIR1979AP75
1. In a motor accident that occurred at about 3 P.M. on 22-1-1972 in the fancy shop of Shah Pratapji Kanmal in the main Bazar of Kothagudem. a number of articles in the shop were damaged. Kilari Mammi of Kothagudem who had come to the shop to purchase fancy goods received grievous injuries; Jaber Singh a boy aged 13 years who was working as the sales boy in the shop also received grievous injuries The managing partner of the Said fancy goods shop (who shall hereinafter be referred to as 'the first petitioner') filed O. P No. 54 of 1972 claiming Rs. 10,914-95 Ps for the estimated damage to the property caused by the motor accident. Kalari Mammi (who shall hereinafter be referred to as 'the second petitioner) and Jaber Singh. (hereinafter referred to as the third petitioner') Bled O P. Nos. 55 and 58 of 1972 each claiming Rs. 9,500/- and Rs. 7,500/- respectively, as damages for the bodily injuries and mental agony suffered by each one of them. The respondents in all the three original pe...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›