Andhra Pradesh Court July 1977 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nagar Mahapalika Vs. P. Gurnai and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-1977
Reported in: 1978CriLJ53
Prem Prakash, J.1. The Nagar Mahapalika, Lucknow, has obtained this rule in revision, Under Section 439 of the old Code of Criminal Procedure, to enhance the sentences awarded to P. Gurnani and Kanhaiya Lai Gurnani Under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (to be hereinafter referred to as the Act). Each of them has been sentenced t0 a fine of Rs. 125/- and simple imprisonment till rising of the court by Sri V.N. Awasthi, Magistrate 1st Class, Lucknow.2. The case of the prosecution was that P. Gurnani was the proprietor of the shop carrying on the business under the name of M/s. Gurnani Provisions Stores and Kanhaiya Lal Gurnani used to sell food articjes at the said shop for and on behalf of P. G. Gurnani, On 31st August, 1969 Kanhaiyalal Gurnani sold 600 grams of 'Saboo Dane Ke Phool' to the Food Inspector, Sri Krishna Mohan Srivastava (P.W. 1) for Rs. 3.25 p. The Food Inspector served the accused with the notice on Form VI intimating there...
P. Ramalakshmamma Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-12-1977
Reported in: AIR1978AP3
ORDER1. The petitioner was plying a stage carriage on the route Chagalamarri to Proddatur via Mydukur . The permit expired on 8-3-1973 . It was renewed for a period of three years , upto 12-3-1976. Meanwhile on 15-11-1972 , the Government published draft scheme to nationalise the route Allagadda to Proddatur via Chagalamarri and Medullar . That scheme was approved by the Government on 22-9-1973 In order to give effect to the approved scheme , the permit of the petitioner was cancelled by the Secretary ,State Transport Authority , Hyderabad , on 26-10-1973 . For the unexpired period of the permit , the petitioner applied to Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation for payment of compensation under S. 68G (4) of the motor Vehicles Act. The Corporation rejected the claim of the petitioner on 5-11-75 . Thereupon he has filed this writ petition . 2. Sri Adinarayana Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that since the permit of the petitioner was cancelled under S. 68...
Shankuntala Sahawala Vs. the Director of Public Instruction Ii, Hydera ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-1977
Reported in: AIR1977AP381; (1978)ILLJ160AP
B.J. Divan, C.J.1. This matter has come before us on a reference made by our learned brother, Madhava Reddy, J. He felt that the earlier Full Bench decision of this High Court in Harijander Singh v. Kakatiya Medical College, Warrangal, : AIR1975AP35 (FB) is affected by the decision of the Supreme Court in Vaish Degree College v. Lakshmi Narain, AIR 1976 SC 888 and that the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in Harijander Singh's case : AIR1975AP35 (FB) requires reconsideration. He, therefore, referred the whole matter to the Full Bench.2. The matter arises under the following circumstances. The petitioner herein is the seniormost Assistant in the school conducted by the second respondent-society. The second respondent-society was registered under the Hyderabad Non-trading Societies Registration Act, which is still in force. The first respondent is the Director of Public Instruction II. Hyderabad and the 3rd respondent is another Assistant in the school conducted by the second res...
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Paga Pulla Red ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-08-1977
Reported in: 1977CriLJ2013
Madhusudan Rao, J.1. The Assistant Police Prosecuting Officer, Alampur filed an application Under Section 321 Cr. P. C. in the court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Alampur requesting the consent of the court for his withdrawal from the prosecution of the sole accused in C. C. No. 18/1972 on the file of that court. The application was filed on the ground that the case was instituted on false premises and that the prosecution of the accused is inexpedient, in so far as there is no reasonable prospect of the case ending in a conviction. The learned Magistrate refused consent on two grounds first, that the A.P.P.O. is not competent to file an application for withdrawal, and the second is, that there is a possibility of the accused being convicted in the case. Against this order of the Magistrate refusing consent for the withdrawal, the State has preferred the instant revision, which came up for hearing before our learned brother, Ramachandra Raju, J. The main contention raised on ...
Swastik Manufacturers Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-07-1977
Reported in: (1978)ILLJ154AP
Alladi Kuppuswami, J.1. The petitioner in these two writ petitions is a factory in Secunderabad. The second respondent in each of the cases is a workman in the factory. They filed two petitions, M.P 88/75 and M.P. 89/75 before the Labour Court, Hyderabad under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act claiming monetary benefits to which they were entitled. Their case was that they were retrenched from services by an order dated 17-1-1975 which was given effect to from 20-1-1975. The petitioner in M. P. No. 88/75 claimed retrenchment compensation of Rs. 1,575, leave salary of Rs. 168, Rs. 210 towards minimum bonus for the year 1974-75, Rs. 213 as unpaid dearness allowance and Rs. 14 being unpaid wages for two days during the month of January 1975. The Labour Court awarded a sum of Rs. 1,998 made up of Rs. 1,575 as retrenchment compensation, Rs. 210 as bonus, Rs. 213 towards dearness allowance from April, 1974 to January, 1975 and rejected the rest of the claim. In M.P. 89/75 the pet...
Ananth Kumar Naik Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-06-1977
Reported in: 1977CriLJ1797
ORDERSambasiva Rao, J.1. If an accused person is directed to undergo blood and seminal test for the purpose of investigation, would it amount to testimonial compulsion coming within the prohibition laid down in Article 20(3) of the Constitution? Whether such a process of investigation would be tantamount to inflicting torture and pain on the person of the accused. Whether there is any provision in the Criminal Procedure Code to direct an accused person to give samples of his blood and semen and whether the criminal court has jurisdiction to give such a direction. These are questions that arise for consideration in this petition.2. The 5th accused has filed this petition challenging the direction of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, that the 5th accused do appear before the Director of Forensic Laboratory, Hyderabad, to enable that Director to take samples of blood and semen. This is a direction granted by the learned Sessions Judge on a petition made by the prosecution Under ...
Harihar Pershad Jaiswal Vs. Suresh Jaiswal and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-1977
Reported in: AIR1978AP13
1. This appeal arises out of an order passed by the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad dismissing the application field by the appellant (Petitioner) under S. 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, on the ground that the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition. The petitioner is the appellant herein. 2. The relevant facts of the case are as follows : The petitioner is the husband of the 3rd respondent. They were married some time in the year 1959 and they had a boy and one girl. The girl was born in some time in the year 1962. The parties lived together at Hyderabad. Some time in the year 1967, quarrels started between the petitioner and respondent No. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the girl (Neeta) was born on 7-5-1962 and she has been studying at the Shiv Dat Raj High School, Lal Bazar, Hyderabad in 4th class in the year 1970. The minor girl Neeta was kidnapped on 2-10-1970 at 12 Noon from the house of the petitioner by the respondents expect respon...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›