Andhra Pradesh Court April 1973 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shaik Basha and anr. Vs. Station House Officer
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-1973
Reported in: AIR1974AP72
ORDER1. A common question is involved in these two revision cases and it is whether the place called 'Happy Corner Amusement Park' is a 'Public Place' within the meaning of Section 12 of the Andra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Gaming Act, 1930, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Krishna made the references recommending to quash the proceedings in the Bench Cases Nos. 8694 and 8695 of 1971 on the file of the First Class Bench Court , Vijayawada, on the ground that the above place cannot be considered as a 'public place' within the meaning of Section 12 of the Act and therefore the petitioners in the two cases cannot be said to have committed any offence within the meaning of Section 12 of the Act. The allegation made against the petitioners in both the cases is : That on 23-11-1981 at about 8-15 p.m. they and others were found in the aforesaid place, 'Happy Corner Amusement Park' situated in Sambamurthy Road, Vijayawada. They were found playing a game o...
S.A. Sattar Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-1973
Reported in: AIR1974AP43
Ekbote, C.J. 1. This appeal is from the judgment of our learned brother O. Chinnappa Reddy , J. given in W.P. No. 2163 of 1972 on 11-10-1972 whereby the learned judge dismissed the Writ petition. It arises in the following circumstances. The petitioner holds a stage carriage permit to his vehicle plying on the route Cuddapah to Tirupati. He had a bus APD 1669 for which he held the said permit. It appears that the original permit was granted some time in 1955 and since then the permit was renewed without any objection till 1970 every three years. A fresh application for renewal was filed in 1970 with the Regional Transport Authority. It was published inviting objections , if any, for such renewal.2. The 4th respondent herein filed objections under Section 57(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act objecting to the renewal of permit. He seems to have entered into an agreement with the appellant for the purchase of the bus APD 1669. It is also alleged that in pursuance of the agreement possession of...
The Hindusthan Ideal Insurance Corporation Ltd. Vs. Manne Chimperamma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-1973
Reported in: AIR1974AP120
1. The short point that arises in this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal involves an interpretation of Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are briefly as follows : The Hindustan Ideal Insurance Company Ltd., Hyderabad, the 2nd respondent in the lower Court, is the appellant herein. The predecessor-in-title of the petitioners in the lower Court was involved in an accident on 24-2-1969 in the lorry APK 5105 belonging to the first respondent in the lower Court who is now impleaded as the 6th respondent herein. The petitioners alleged that on account of the vehicle, it ended in an accident causing the death of Sivaramaiah, the predecessor-in-title of the petitioners.3. In the lower Court the Insurance Company contested the petition raising the pleas that there was no negligence on the part of the driver and also raising the following plea in paragraph 6 :'This respondent submits that in view of the agreed conditions regarding limitations as to use of the v...
Managing Committee, Murali Manohar Temple and anr. Vs. Ramachander and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-05-1973
Reported in: AIR1974AP123
1. Against an order passed in E. A. No. 114 of 1972 in E. P. No. 17 of 1965 on the file of the Court of Chief Judge , City Civil Court, Hyderabad, respondents 2 and 3 have preferred C. M. A. No. 10 of 1973, while C. M. A. No. 33 of 1973 was preferred by the first respondent. There is a long history which led to the filing of these two appeals and it is better to state the same briefly in order to understand the respective contentions of both the parties.2. One Ramachander (1st respondent in both the appeals) was a tenant in a malgi No. 21-2-120 Kaman-e-saher-e Batil , situated at Charkaman, Hyderabad which is an endowment belonging to Murali Manohar Temple, Hyderabad. The said endowment was governed by Hyderabad Endowments Regulations sanctioned by His Exalted Highness, the Nizam on 16th Shahban 1358 Hijri 1349 F. 1940 A.D. Exercising powers under clause No. 14 of the said regulations, the Director of Endowments passed an order on 14th August 1965, that Ramachander should be evicted fr...
S. Seetha Ramaiah Naidu Vs. Ongole Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-1973
Reported in: AIR1974AP49
Ekbote, C.J.1. This appeal is from the judgment of our learned brother Chinappa Reddy, J., given in Writ Petition 1441 of 1972 on 7-7-1972, whereby the learned Judge dismissed the Writ Petition.2. The facts in outline are : The Ongole Co-operative Bank Ltd., has a Board of Directors, It consists of 7 Directors. The petitioner was elected to the Board of Directors in January, 1971. The term of office of a Director is three years. Accordingly , he would have normally continued till the end of December, 1974.3. On 29-3-1972, however, the petitioner was served with a communication from the President of the Ongole Co-operative Bank Ltd., that he has ceased to be a Director of the Bank under bye-law 22 on account of his having absented himself from three consecutive meetings of the Board of Directors held on 6-1-1972, 14-2-1972 and 19-2-1972. It is that communication which gave rise to the writ petition.4. It was contended before the learned single Judge by the petitioner that bye-law 22 was...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›