Andhra Pradesh Court August 1972 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Srimanthu Rajah Yarlagadda Sivarama Prasad Bhadur Zamindar Vs. State o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-10-1972
Reported in: AIR1973AP281
Ekbote, C.J. 1. These writ petitions filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India seek to quash the order of the Estates Abolition Tribunal, Krishna dated 10-1-1968 by the issue of a writ of certiorari. The Tribunal's order is a common order passed in several Tribunal appeal suits. The writ petitions confine the attack on this order to the items in regard to which decision has been given by the tribunal against the petitioner.2. The estate of Devarakota was notified under the Estates Abolition Act and taken over by the State Government on 7-9-1949. The petitioner, who is a landholder, applied for the grant of patta under Section 12(a) of the act in respect of several items of lanka lands situate in seven villages within the ambit of Deverakota estate on the ground that these lanka lands are his private lands. The claim was based on three grounds. It was firstly contended that the lands in dispute are situate in the river bed of Krishna and since the petitioner is a riparian owner,...
Bhimavarapu Subba Reddy and anr. Vs. B. Nagireddy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-08-1972
Reported in: AIR1973AP184
Alladi Kuppuswami, J.1. Defendants 2 and 3 in O. S. No. 41 of 1964 on the file of the Sub Court, Gudivada are the appellants. The suit was brought by respondents 1 and 2 herein who were minors, represented by their mother and guardian, for partition and separate possession of the plaint ' A ' Schedule property into three equal shares and for allotment of two such shares to the plaintiffs after setting aside the alienation of the A Schedule property by their father to the extent of the plaintiffs' share and for other reliefs. The plaintiffs' father, Bhimavarapu Nagireddy, was the first defendant in the suit, and the alienees Defendants 2 and 3.2. Nagireddi and his two minor sons constituted a joint Hindu family. The family owned ancestral property of an extent of Ac. 2-64 cents of wet land and 0-04 cents of house site in the village of Pamarru, Krishna District. Nagireddi was also carrying on business on fertilisers and was plying motor vehicles. He purchased the plaint A Schedule prope...
Manne Kishtiah and ors. Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak, Gov ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1972
Reported in: AIR1972AP276
ORDER1. The petitioners who are thirty three in number have filed this writ petition for the issue of a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, restraining the respondents from taking up the construction of any channel or water course or otherwise disturbing the existing channel from the village tank called Pedda Cheruvu situate between Kansanapalli and Seri Mallareddipalli, in Andole Taluk, Medak District.2. The petitioners state that they are all pattadars of different lands varying in extents from 4-00 guntas to Ac. 2-12 guntas situate in the village of Kansanapalli, that all the petitioners were cultivating the said lands by taking water from the tank called Pedda Cheruvu for over several decades, that water was being carried to their fields from the said channel through the water course or channel, that the said source is the only source of water to the said lands, that the revenue authorities are the Executive Engineer, public Works Departments, took u...
Gadde Koteswara Rao and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1972
Reported in: 1974CriLJ81
ORDER1. In Sessions Case No. 25 of 1968 on the file of the Sessions Judge. Kistna at Machilipatnam, A6 was convicted for the offences under Sections 147, 348 read with 149 : 330 read with 149 and 304 Part II read with 149 I. P. C., for the part played by him in the burning of a Haitian boy at Kanchikacherla on 24-2-1968 after pouring kerosene on him and setting fire to him in order to extort a confession regarding some thefts, and in lieu of the sentence of imprisonment. as he was less than 16 years then, the Sessions Judge holding that as A6 comes under the definition of 'young person' defined in Section 3 (2) of the Madras Childrens Act IV of 1920. directed under Section 23 (2) of the said Act that he should be sent to a Senior Certified School for a period of two years. In Crl. A. No. 946/68 filed by the State, all the above convictions as against A6 were set aside and he along with A3 and A5 was instead convicted for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34, I. P. C. and ...
Dasari Jayachandra Prasad and ors. Vs. Dasari Venkata Subbaiah and ors ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-1972
Reported in: AIR1973AP214
Obul Reddi, J.1. The result of this appeal will depend upon the answer we give to the question whether the alienations made by the 1st defendant, the father of the plaintiffs 1 to 4 ; 2, 3 & 4 being minors ; represented by the next friend, the 1st plaintiff, were intended to benefit the joint family of which the Ist defendant and the plaintiffs were undivided members.2. In this appeal, we are only concerned with the alienations made by the 1st defendant under Ex.B-28 dated 10.2.1954 in favour of the 2nd defendant and under Ex.B-12 dated 7.2.1954 in favour of the 16th defendant, and the alienations covered by Ex. B-14 dated 22.2.1954 in favour of the 16th defendant and under Ex. B-32 dated 19.2.1954 in favour of the 15th defendant.3. We may state at the outset that neither the 1st plaintiff the major son of the 1st defendant nor the 1st defendant nor the mother of the plaintiffs has gone into the witness box to rebut the evidence adduced by the defendants 2, 5, 6, 25 and 26.4. The facts...
The Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes and anr. Vs. Shah Tarac and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-1972
Reported in: [1973]31STC476(AP)
Gopal Rao Ekbote, C.J.1. The only short but important question, which has to be answered in these appeals, is whether the silk yarn is hand-spun yarn within the meaning of item 20 of para. 4 of G. 0. Ms. No. 1091 dated 10th June, 1957.2. India has a rich sericigenous fauna and is the only country in the world which produces all the four economically known varieties of silk, viz., mulberry silk, eri silk, tasar silk and muga silk. While India ranks fourth in the world monopoly in regard to the production of muga silk, the silk production industry is predominantly an agro-industry.3. Silk production is a four-tier process-mulberry cultivation, cocoon raising, raw silk reeling and silk weaving. While the first two stages are integrated with agriculture, the latter two come under the industrial sector.4. Of the four species, mulberry is grown in India. Indian mulberry cocoons have on an average 200 to 300 metres of reelable silk filament and the cocoon raw silk ratio (renditta) in filature...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›