Andhra Pradesh Court September 1970 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Muttangi Ranganayakamma and anr. Vs. Kuttangi Venkata Mahalakshmi and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-28-1970
Reported in: AIR1972AP117
1. Quite an elaborate argument was addressed in what appears to me to be a simple case in which the only question for determination is whether there is any case made out for the reversal of the decree made ex parte by the court below.2. The real contesting parties herein are two brothers. The first plaintiff is the wife of the second plaintiff. His brother is the second defendant and the wife of the latter is the first defendant. On the strength of the deed of sale dated April 12, 1961, the first plaintiff is claiming a half share of the property covered by the deed. The terms of the deed show that the first plaintiff and first defendant have together acquired the property. There is no doubt that according to the apparent tenor of the document the two women are the co-owners. There is nothing in the deed to show that their sharers are not equal.3. The written statement does not impugn the validity of the sale deed. The defence is that the second plaintiff desired that the purchase shou...
District Panchayat Officer Krishna at Chilakalapudi Vs. Pathapati Nage ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-1970
Reported in: AIR1972AP69
ORDER1. The sole point involved in this revision petition is whether the District Panchayat Officer is competent to file a suit on behalf of Gram Panchayat to recover any sum certified to be due from any person by the auditor. In this case the District Panchayat Officer. Machilipatam filed a suit against the ex-sarpanch of Tasivipudi gram Panchayat to recover a sum of Rs. 442-18 Paise as the amount due from him in pursuance of a surcharge certificate issued against him by the audit party. The lower court dismissed the suit by holding that the District Panchayat Officer is not competent to file the suit on behalf of the gram panchayat. Rules 7 of the Rules relating to audit, surcharge, disallowance and appeals under Cls. VII and IX of sub-section (2) of S. 217 of the A. P. Gram Panchayat Act is as follows:--- 'Every sum certified to be due from any person by the auditor under these rules shall be paid by such person into the nearest Government Treasury or in the nearest post office savi...
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad Vs. T.V. Sarma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-1970
Reported in: AIR1972AP96
1. The respondent is the owner of the house Nos. 4-4-221 and 212 situate at Thanumal Road, Sultan Bazar, Hyderabad. After the purchase of the house by the respondent, during his absence, a portion of it was demolished by the staff of the Municipal Corporation. The respondent thereafter launched a criminal prosecution against he then Commissioner, Engineer. Assistant Engineer etc., for the demolition of the house alleging that after granting permission to build as per the sanctioned plan, the new construction was pulled down in he respondent's absence. He also filed a civil suit and a Writ in the High Court in connection with the demolition of a part of the suit house. Ultimately the matter was compromised where under the respondent was paid compensation and various proceedings were withdrawn.2. The house has a first storey with balcony, which balcony he proposed to extend overhanging the road below by three feet. The balcony was to be supported by four cement concrete pillars to be con...
In Re: Uppari Nallanna and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-1970
Reported in: 1972CriLJ433
ORDERA.D.V. Reddy, J.1. These three revision petitions are against the convictions of the accused concerned in S. T. Cs. 90. 97 and 94/68 respectively on the file of the 1st, Class Magistrate. Gadwal.2. On the night of 22-12-1967 the Special Deputy Collector, Mobile Check Post Mahaboobnagar on information that paddy was being smuggled to Mysore State, went along with his mobile staff consisting of H. C. 506 arid some constables and were lying in wait near the road leading to Talamarri village in the Mysore State and at about 2 a. m, they found the accused in S. T. C. 94/68 coming driving 8 carts with 49 bags of paddy in them going Talamarri village and they stopped them in Nadajjoni Dukki in the limits of Kutuknoor village which is two furlongs away from the Mysore border. On questioning the accused, they stated that the paddy belonged to Seetharamaiah of Pedda Tandrapad, that they were hired cart-men and were transporting the paddy from Medikunda village of Gadwal Taluk to Talamarri v...
Shaikh Bale Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-1970
Reported in: AIR1971AP302
ORDER1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ directing respondents 1 and 2 (The State of Andh Pradesh R-1 and the Deputy Director of Veterinary, Biological and Research Institute, Hyderabad-2) to call for tenders for the supply of Beef, heart and Liver for the year 1970-71 and also to restrain them from executing a contract for the supply of the said articles, to the 3rd respondent.2. The petitioner is a Beef contractor carrying on the business of supply to beef. The State of Andhra Pradesh through its department of Veterinary, Biological Research, prepares Beef extracts and liver extracts. It was usual for respondents 1 and 2 to call for tenders for the supply of the raw material for the said extraction, viz., Beef, Liver and Heart. For the year 1970-71 such tenders were called for not for the supply or raw material, viz., Beef, Liver and Heart but for the supply of extracts. But the petitioner on en...
Y. Panduranga Swamy Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-21-1970
Reported in: AIR1971AP234
Vaidya, J.1. The petitioner joined service in the Co-operative Department in the year 1953 as Senior Inspector at Eluru. He was promoted as Sub Registrar of Co-operative Societies in February 1961 and was the business Manager of the West Godavari District Co-operative Marketing Federation. Eluru from 9-12-61. While he was discharging his duties, according to the petitioner, honestly to the satisfaction of his superiors, the State of Andhra Pradesh respondent No. 1 on 29-8-1966 referred to the Tribunal for Disciplinary proceedings. Government of Andhra Pradesh respondent No. 2 for enquiry and report under Section 4 of the A. P. Civil Services (Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal) Act. 1960, (hereinafter referred to as the Disciplinary Tribunals Act) certain allegations of misconduct against the petitioner. The 2nd respondent on 18-9-1966 framed three charges against the petitioner. Those charges are:'That the charged officer while working as Co-operative Sub-Registrar Business Manager of ...
Rsamchander Naik Vs. Linga Ramachanderiah (Died) L. Bhoiavva and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1970
Reported in: AIR1971AP395
Venkateswara Rao, J. 1. C. C. C. A. No. 36 of 1964 is directed against the judgment and decree in O. S. 41/59 on the file of the First Additional Judge. City Civil Court, Hyderabad, while the revision petitions arise out of proceedings under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act (XXI of 1950), which will hereinafter be referred to as 'Tenancy Act'. Defendant No. 1 in the suit, who was also the petitioner in the proceedisngs under the Tenancy Act, has preferred the appeal and the revision petitions.2. The subject -matter of this lsitigations is 303 acres of pasture land knows as 'Barman Cheru Kancha' and comprised in S. Nos. 261 to 279 of Jeedimetla village. Late Govinda Naik. the father of the defendants, was the original pattadar of this land and it is also common ground that she inducted the plaintiff into possession of the same as tenant in aborts the year 1918 or 1919.3. In September, 1952, the plaintiff filed O. S. 46/53-54 in the Court of the Muns...
J.V. Seshaiah and Sons and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and or ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-1970
Reported in: [1971]28STC614(AP)
Ramachandra Raju, J. 1. The petitioners who are 33 in number are oil-millers in Kurnool District. The writ was filed against the State of Andhra Pradesh and the Commercial Tax Officers of Kurnool, Adoni and Nandyal. It was filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to forbear from giving effect to G.O. Ms. No. 300, Revenue (S), dated 8th March, 1966, or to pass such other order or orders that this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Under the G.O. referred to above the Government amended the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957, by adding Rule 45-D to the said Rules. It is convenient 0to extract the impugned rule here:45-D. Every miller of groundnuts, other than a decorticating miller, shall maintain a register in Form XXVII showing the hour-to-hour working of the decorticator and expeller, the number of coolies employed for decortications and crushing, and the quantity of oil...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›