Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court August 1970 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Aug 04 1970

Reddi Veerraju Vs. Chittori Lakshminarasamma and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-04-1970

Reported in: AIR1971AP266

Obul Reddi, J.1. Appeal No.28 of 1967 arises out of the Judgment in O.S. 53 of 1964 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Rajahmundry passing a preliminary decree in favour of the plaintiff in terms thereof. Appeal No. 381 of 1967 and the un-numbered appeal (SR1448/67) are directed against the decision in O.S. No.54 of 1964 passing a preliminary decree. 2nd defendant in O.S.No.53 of 1964 preferred appeal No.28 of 1976; defendants 2 and 3 in O.S. No.54 of 1964 and the 6th defendant the very same suit preferred appeal NO.381/67 and the un-numbered appeal respectively.2. The plaintiff instituted O.S. No.53 of 1964 for recovery of Rupees 14,000/- on the foot of Ex. A-2 dated 4-1-1952, a registered mortgage deed executed by the 1st defendant; and O.S. No.54 of 1964 for recovery of a similar amount of Rs. 14,000/- on the foot of Ex. A-1 mortgage executed on the same date i.e., 4-1-1952 by the 1st defendant for himself and on behalf of his minor sons, defendants 2 and 3. Though the defendants...


Aug 03 1970

M.C. Mulajkar Vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-03-1970

Reported in: AIR1971AP169

Ramachandra Rao, J.1. This appeal is against the judgment of our learned brother Obul Reddi, J. dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the appellant herein for the issue of a Writ of mandamus restraining the respondents viz. The State of Andhra Pradesh, the Collector of Hyderabad District and the Special Deputy Tahsildar, Urban, Hyderabad, to forbear from taking proceedings under the Madras Revenue Recovery Act against the appellant (petitioner) in pusurance of Form No. II noticed dated 6-5-1967 issued by the 3rd respondent.2. The appellant herein obtained a loan of Rs. 20,000/- by mortgaging certain immoveable properties in December, 1953 from the Industrial Trust Fund (hereinafter called the Fund) which was constituted under the Hyderabad Industrial Trust Fund Rules, 1347 Hizri. He obtained another loan of Rs. 30,000/- in August, 1953 from the same fund by hypothecating certain moveable property. In December, 1955 he obtained a further loan of Rs. 25,000/- from the fund hypothecating ...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial