Andhra Pradesh Court April 1970 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satya Pramoda Teertha Swamuluvaru Vs. Commissioner of Hindu Religious ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-24-1970
Reported in: AIR1971AP211
Kondaiah, J.1. As the point involved in these cases is common, they are disposed of by a common judgment.2. It is sufficient to state the facts in Writ Appeal No. 599 of 1969: The application filed by the Writ Petitioner Sri Satya Pramoda Teertha Swamulavaru, Head of the Uttaradi Mtt under Section 57 (a) of the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act (XIX of 1951) for declaration that Uttaradi Mutt was not a public institution within the meaning of the Act and hence, it was not amenable to the jurisdiction of the Endowments Department, was dismissed by the Deputy Commissioner on December 16, 1965. The appeal preferred against the decision of the Deputy Commissioner, under Section 61 (1) of that At to the Commissioner for Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments on February 23, 1966 was pending before him on the date of the coming into force of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act (XVII of 1966) i.e. on 26-1-1967. The appeal was...
The Management of Singareni Collieries Co. Limited Vs. the Industrial ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-24-1970
Reported in: (1975)ILLJ470AP
ORDERSreeramulu, J.1. The facts leading to writ Appeal No. 17 of 1969 are : The anagement of the Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. Kothagudem filed a single writ petition against eight of its workers for quashing the sommon order of the Industrial Tribunal, refusing to approve the dismissal orders passed by the management against its workers. The Office raised an objection that a single writ petition was not maintainable to quash the order of the Industrial Tribunal, although common, passed on eight separate applications filed by the management against its workers. The petition was heard by ourearned brother Sambasiva Rao, J., who held that a single writ petition questioning the order in all the eight miscellaneous petitions, though all of them were disposed of by a common order would not lie. It is against he order of our learned brother that the writ petitioner has come up in appeal.2. In W.P. No. 140 of 1967 a preliminary objection was raised to the effect that because the proceedings a...
S.A. Sattar Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-1970
Reported in: AIR1971AP349
ORDER1. This application by the petitioner, under Article 226 of the Constitution, is to quash the orders of the State Government setting aside the order of the Appellate Authority and remanding the matter to the Regional Transport Authority, Cuddapah for disposal.2. The material facts leading to this writ petition may briefly be stated; The petitioner, the 4th respondent herein and 14 others applied for the grant of state carriage permits on the route Cuddapah to Ahobilam. Though the petitioner had applied for one permit on the route, the 4th respondent was the applicant for two permits. The Regional Transport Authority awarded four marks to the petitioner as well as the 4th respondent but granted both the permits to the 4th respondent on 20-2-1963. it was also found that the applicants 2 and 3 are the sons of applicant No. 4 and all of them are living jointly having joint business and they owned five permits and the route being a medium one, the 4th respondent was preferred to applic...
Ravi Lakshmaiah Vs. Nagamothu Lakshmi and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-1970
Reported in: AIR1971AP380
Kuppuswami, J.1. The appellant herein is the sister's son of the plaintiff in O.S. No. 66 1966 Sub-Court, Vijayawada. The plaintiff in that suit filed the suit for partion and separate possession suit for partion and separate possession of her 1/2 share in the suit schedule properties which belonged to her sons Venkatramaiah who died on the 30th December 1963. The two defendants to the suit are his widows. The first defendant supported the plaintiff. but the second defendant contend that she was entitled to the whole property of their deceased husband under an unregistered will executed by him on 28-12-1963. The plaintiff stating that she was residing in a portion of the houses belonging to Venkatarmaiah applied for an injunction in I.A.No. 391 of 1969 restoring the second defendant from interfering with her possession. On a undertaking given by the second defendant that she had no objection to the plaintiff being in possession of the northern portion of the house till the suit was dis...
Syed Abbas HussaIn Nagri Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-1970
Reported in: AIR1971AP1
Vaidya, J.1. The appellant in all these writ appeals are personnel who were in the service of the State of Hyderabad as it was existing prior to 1-11-1956 and were allotted t the State of Andhra Pradesh from 1-11-56. The Appellants in W.A.No.167 of 1967. and 9,10 and 11 of 1968 were Tahsildars on 1-11-56 and were promoted as Deputy Collectors after that date. They filed writ petitions out of which these writ appeal arise on their being reverted to the post of Tahsildars. Writ Appeal No. 167 of 1967 arises out of Writ Petition No. 2067 of 1966. Writ Appeals 9,10 and 11 of 1968 air out of Writ petitions 2082 of 1966. 60/67 and 244/67 respectively. The Writ petitions were dismissed by a common judgment rendered by our a common judgment rendered by our learned brother Chinnappa Reddy. J. The appellation Writ Appeal No. 253 of 1968 was a Nayab Tahsildar (Deputy Tahsildar) on 1-11-1956 and was later promoted as Tahsildar. he filed writ petition No. 825 f 1967 out of which the aforesaid appea...
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. Rayalaseema Village Asso ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1970
Reported in: AIR1971AP255
Sharfuddin Ahamed, J. 1. The two appeals arise out of the judgment and order of our learned brother Chinnappa Reddy J., made in Writ petitions 2991 and 3316 of 1967 holding Section 19 (1) of the Andhra Pradesh Khadi and Village Industries Board Act (IV of 1959) ultra vires as offending Article 14 of the Constitution.2. The facts necessary to appreciate the arguments on either side may briefly be stated. The petitioner in Writ Petition No.2991 of 1967 is the Rayalaseema Village Service Association, Chagalamarri. This association was granted a loan of Rs.5,300/- for the purchase and working of ghanies by the Andhra Pradesh Khadi and Village Industries Board (hereinafter called the Board). In the affidavit filed by the Secretary of the Association it was stated that the Association inpursuant to the securing of the loan started the working of ghanies and also pushed its products into the market for sale which earned a rebate of Rupees 362-27P, thus having a balance of Rupees 4,937-733 P. ...
Kommisetti Venkatasubbayya Vs. Karamsetti Venkateswarlu and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-1970
Reported in: AIR1971AP279
1. The plaintiff is the appellant. His filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale Ex, A-1 executed by the 1st defendant on behalf of himself and the 2nd defendant on 24-4-1960 agreeing to sell a house site in Kavali. He paid Rs. 50/- on the date of execution of the agreement and he avers that he paid a further sum of Rs. 1500/- on 14-10-1960 receiving which the defendants put him in possession of the suit site. He says that he has been ready and willing to perform his part of the contract and called upon the defendants by a notice dated 10-10-1961 (Ex. A-13) to execute a sale deed after receiving the balance of the purchase money. 2nd defendant however sole the suit site to 3rd defendant under Ex. B-9 dated 14-11-1963 and the 3rd defendant in turn sold the same to 4th defendant under Ex. B-6 dated 21-5-62 (sic) 4th defendant also alienated the site in favour of 5th defendant under Ex.B-7 dated 27-9-1963. The 5th defendant trespassed on the land on 11-11-1963. The pla...
The Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Limited and anr. Vs. the State ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-1970
Reported in: [1973]30STC26(AP)
Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. These two writ petitions raise common questions and may be disposed of by one judgment. It is sufficient if the facts in W.P. No. 1608 of 1967 are mentioned. The petitioner in W.P. No. 1608 of 1967 is the Hyderabad Allwyn Metal Works Limited. In compliance with Section 46 of the Factories Act of 1948 and the Rules made thereunder, the petitioner provides and maintains a canteen for the use of the workers. The petitioner-company submitted a provisional return to the Commercial Tax Officer, First Circle, Hyderabad, in Form A-2 under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. The Commercial Tax Officer, noticing that the turnover relating to the sales at the canteen had not been included in the return, issued a notice on 26th October, 1966, proposing to include the sales of food and drink at the canteen in the turnover of the petitioner for the purpose of provisional assessment. The petitioner was asked whether it had any objection to the same. The petitioner submitte...
Karimnissa Begam Vs. the Regional Transport Authority, Anthapur and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-1970
Reported in: AIR1972AP107
Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is a transport operator plying a stage carriage on the route Sidhout to Neolivedu of a distance of 80 miles and lying wholly within the Cuddapah District. The second respondent is another transport operator plying a stage carriage on the route Tallapula to Rayachoti via Valiveedu of a distance of 70 miles. a major portion of which is in Anantapur District and a small portion of the length of 18 miles in Cuddapah District. The two routes have a common sector between Galiveedu and Rayachoti in Cuddapah District. The Second respondent applied to the Regional Transport Authority Anantapur to vary his permit by allowing him to make a shuttle trip between Galiveedu and Rayachoti. The Regional Transport Authority, Anantapur varied the permit as requested at its meeting held on 24-12-1966. The petitioner came to know of the variation of the permit of the Second respondent when the second respondent started running a shuttle trip between Galiveedu and Rayach...
Rangapalli Basamma Vs. Gift Tax Officer, Hindupur
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-1970
Reported in: [1971]81ITR391(AP)
Chinnnappa Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is the widow of late Sri Siddappa of Gorantla who dies on 23-11-1961. Late Siddappa left behind him his widow, the petitioner his daughter Gowramma by a deceased wife, and his permanently kept mistress Mudiramma. About five years prior to his death Siddappa made a gift of Rs. 1,38,000/-, Rs. 69,000/- to T. M. Nagaraju son of Bhagirathamma, Daughter of the petitioner and Rs. 69,000/- to Mallikarjunappaa and Vaiswanadhapa, sons of Gowramma. Bhagirthmma predeceased her father. By a will dated 10-6-1957 Siddappa bequeathed the properties mentioned in the A Schedule annexed to the will to Gowramma with limited interest and thereafter to her sons, properties mentioned in the B Schedule to the petitioner with limited interest and thereafter to her daughter and her daughter's sons and the properties mentioned in the C Schedule to Mudiramma with absolute rights. After the death of Siddappa the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty passed an order dated 8-10-6...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »