Andhra Pradesh Court July 1967 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
E. Pedda Subba Reddy and ors. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-1967
Reported in: AIR1969AP281; 1969CriLJ1025
Obul Reddi, J.1. This criminal Revision case is before us as it has been referred to a Division bench by Narashimam J., on the question 'whether cognizance can be taken of an offence under Section 211, I. P. C. on a private complaint'. The controversy relates to the interpretation of the words, 'When such offence is alleged to have been committed in , or in relation to any proceeding in any court' occurring in Section 195(1)(b), Criminal Procedure Code. Before we proceed to deal with the question referred to the Bench, it may be necessary to set out the relevant facts leading to the filing of the revision case.2. A complaint was filed by the second respondent against the revision petitioner in the Court of the Judicial second Class Magistrate, Jammalamadugu under Sections 193, 194 and 211 of the Indian Penal Code. The first petitioner gave a report to the village Munisf, Ulappalli, alleging that the second respondent who was armed with a gun shot one Udala Pedda Subba Reddi on 17-2-64 ...
Cherupu Venkata Varaha Narasimham Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-1967
Reported in: AIR1968AP344
Basi Reddy, J.1. On June 2, 1963 the Assistant Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram, on receiving information that the house bearing No 15-5-9/3 in Temple Street in Vizianagaram was being run as a common gaming-house, ostensibly under the name and style of 'Brothers Union Recreation Club', raided the premises. He look with him two mediators and Sub-Inspector of Police and when the party entered the premises they found seven persons sitting round a table, playing a card game known as 'rummy' with plastic chips evidently convertible into money value. The Assistant Superintendent of Police interrogated the gamblers and seized the playing cards, the chips and an amount of Rs. 1-67 np. He then searched the adjoining portion of the same premises, which was occupied by Chepuri Venkata Varaha Narasimhulu alias Baburao. That person was stated to be the Secretary of the Club and was apparently running the common gaming-house. On a search of his room, a sum of Rs 1230-67 Np. in cash besides thr...
Sarwar Khan Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-1967
Reported in: AIR1968AP290; 1968CriLJ1338
ORDER1. The petitioner is a driver of jeep No. MYV 514. It is alleged that on 28-8-19(i4 on the Kuppam-Palamaner road he drove the jeep rashly and thereby caused the death of one Guruswamiah At a place called Thummsi, the petitioner Rave lift to some people, including P. W. 2. the deceased, grand-father of P. W. 2. and P W. 9. He is alleged to have driven the jeep in a rash and negligent manner with the result that it left the road and dashed against a tree. The deceased, Guruswamiah, fell down from the jeep and sustained injuries, and later died. It is also said that two other person? to whom the petitioner was giving a lift refused to travel further after the occurrence, but the petitioner continued the journey towards Kuppam after lifting the injured into his jeep. After going about two furlongs, the petitioner, on some pretext, made P. W. 2 sit down on the road along with the deceased and then drove on. On these facts he was convicted by the trial Magistrate and was sentenced to un...
J.C. Nagireddy Vs. P. Nagamma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-1967
Reported in: AIR1968AP298
Basi Reddy, J.1. This appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the order of Obul Reddi J., dated 3-11-1966 made in Writ Petition No, 1153 of 1965, whereby the learned Judge quashed the order of the Government of Andhra Pradesh in G.O. Ms. No. 1038 Home (Transport-III). Department, dated 21-5-1965 and gave a direction to the Government to dispose of the matter in the light of the observations made by him in his order.2. The central issue in this writ appeal turns upon the true interpretation of certain provisions of Rule 153-D of the Madras Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940, as amended by G. O. Ms. No 2455, Home (Transport-I) dated 25-11-1960 Before dealing with this question, it is necessary to set out briefly the history of this case, which relates to the grant of a stage carriage permit3. The Regional Transport Authority, Anantapur at its meeting held on 30-5-1963 considered the question of granting one stage carriage permit on the route Pulivendla to Anantapur. Ther...
Kruthiventi Kutumba Rao Vs. Muthi Venkata Subba Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-1967
Reported in: AIR1969AP47; 1969CriLJ149
Jaganmohan Reddy, C.J. 1. This is a petition to commit Respondents Nos. 1 to 6 for contempt for violating the orders of the District Munsif, Vijayawada, by obstructing the Advocate Commissioner Sr. P. V. Rama Sarma while performing the duties directed in the warrant issued to him in I. A. No. 179/67 in O. S. No. 78/67, that it for seizing the account books and papers ( items 1 to 19) mentioned in the petition and to file the same in the court2. The petitioner is founder member of Sri Velidendla Hanumantharaya Grandhalayam which was founded in the year 1934 in memory of the late Mr. Velidendla Hanumantha Rao. He is also the Secretary for a long time and the joint secretary of the Executive Treasurer of the library. In 1944 the library was registered as No. 2/44 under the Societies Act, and he is one of the persons who had subscribed to the memorandum of Association. In 1964, during the General Body Meeting the strength of the Executive was increased by providing for one president, three...
Chimalakonda Ambayamma (Died) and anr. Vs. Chimalakonda Ganapathi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-17-1967
Reported in: AIR1969AP213
Jaganmohan Reddy, C.J.1. This second appeal has been referred to this bench by our learned brother Basi Reddy J., as raising an important question under S. 25 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act in respect of which it is said there is a conflict authority. There are two decisions of this Court: one of a Bench consisting of Subba Rao, C. J. and Mohd. Ahmad Ansari, J. (as they then were) in Kameswarmma v. Subrahmanyam, : AIR1959AP269 and the second of a Full Bench consisting of Chandra Reddy, C. J., Srinivasachari and one of us (the present Chief Justice) in Ramamurthy v. Sitaramma, : AIR1961AP131 (FB), which bear upon the question. Before we examine these cases, it is necessary to state briefly the facts which give rise to the question before us, viz., whether the death of the deceased whose widow is claiming enhanced maintenance should have been after commencement of the Act in order to get the benefit of Section 25 ofsaid Act There were two brothers Venkateswarlu and Padmanabha...
Adapa Vittal Vs. Govula Ramakistiah and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-14-1967
Reported in: AIR1969AP169
Vaidya, J. 1. This appeal arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiff as C. S. 18 of 1960 in the Court of the Chief Judge. City Civil Court, Hyderabad against one Ramakrishtiah and Yellappa and the plaintiff's brother Adapa Narayan.2. The material allegations in the plaint are that the plaintiff, third defendant, Adapa Hanmaiah and Ramalingam are brothers and members of a Hindu joint family till 1938, when Ramalingam separated from the rest of the family. After the separation of Ramalingam, the family continued to be joint till July 1940 when there was separation in mess between the brothers. The plaintiff's allegation is that thereafter separate khatas were opened in the names of the three brothers representing their branch of families and all the amounts paid or expended by them used to be debited in their respective names. In 1942 the third defendant opened a shop in a partnership with the 1st dependent under the name and style of Adapa Narayan Bombay Palakol Cloth shop borrowing mo...
Allam Gangadhara Rao Vs. Gollapalli Gangarao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-1967
Reported in: AIR1968AP291
1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment and decree of the District Judge, East Godavari given on 10-8-1963 whereby the learned Judge allowed the appeal and dismissed the plaintiff's suit.2. The essential facts are that the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of possession of the suit land admeasuring 3 acres and 30 cents and for recovery of the value of the crop of Rs. 800/- alleged to have been removed by the defendant in 1959. He also claimed damages for use and occupation for two years 1959-60 and 1960-61 at Rs. 800/- a year and also claimed future profits. It was alleged inter alia that the defendant married Suryavathi, the sister of the plaintiff, in 1956. She unfortunately died in 1960 leaving behind her two children. The plaintiff claims that he purchased the suit land on 3-7-1955 on the basis of a sale deed, Exhibit A-2, from a third person and since then has been in possession of the land in his own right. The land is situated at the village Thotapeta, a plac...
Miryala Venkateswarlu and Co. and ors. Vs. Battula Venkata Peraiah and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-12-1967
Reported in: AIR1969AP88
Jaganmohan Reddy, C.J. 1. This second appeal has been referred to the bench by our learned brother Ekbote, J., In view of the important question raised as it is likely that more than one case is affected and also because there is no direct authority available. 2. The question that falls for determination is a simple one, whether the contract in question is hit by Section 15 read with Section 2(c) of the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 74 of 1952 (herein called the Forward Contracts Act). 3. The appellant and the respondents are merchants whose business consists of buying and selling ginned cotton. The appellant agreed to sell 60 bales of Narasaraopet Bale Cotton at the rate of Rs. 332/- per putti of 784 Ibs. before 25-11-1955 the payment to be made after the weighment of bales and to be delivered at the site of Raleigh Company or Valcot Company. This agreement was entered into on 10-11-1955. When the goods were not delivered, the respondent filed a suit to claim damages for the non...
In Re: Govindu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-12-1967
Reported in: 1969CriLJ1157
Obul Reddi, J.1. This appeal arises from the judgment on the Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Sessions cage No. 2/65 convicting the appellant under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentencing him to imprisonment for His for the murder at one Mualiah on the night of 1-12-1964.2. The brief facts of the case of the prosecution are these: P. W. 7 a middle aged woman was living as the miatreas of the deceased Mualiah for about 18 jeara in Vijayawada Town. The accused got acquainted with P. W. 7 the mistress of the deceased as he was having a book shop next door to the laundry of the deceased. The accused who happens to be a married man with six children came down to Hyderabad about two years prior to the occurrence and started book binding business in the city. His coming over to Hyderabad made no difference so far as his relationship with P. W. 7 is concerned. At his request, the deceased and his mistress (P. W. 7) came over to Hyderabad as the accused promised the deceased to find a suitable...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »