Andhra Pradesh Court October 1967 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Yousuf Begam Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-1967
Reported in: AIR1969AP10
ORDER1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution, filed by Yousuf Begum, seeking an appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the award made on 18-3-1966 by the Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Hyderabad District (the 2nd respondent to this writ petition) in Case No. O/1136/LA/66, with a further prayer that the petitioner may be made a party to the proceedings before that authority and a direction be issued to that authority to pass a fresh award, and further to pass any order or direction as this Court may deem fit. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that although she is 'a person interested in the land' which was compulsorily acquired by the Government under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for construction of offices and staff quarters for their new Railway Zone, and as such, was entitled to a notice of the land acquisition proceedings under sub-section (2) of Sec. 9 of the Land Acquisition Act, yet the 2nd respondent pr...
Malladi Seetharama Sastry Vs. Naganath Kawlwar and Sons
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1967
Reported in: AIR1968AP315
ORDER1. This is a revision petition under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act. The plaintiff, whose claim to recover a sum of Rs. 1219-97 nP. from the defendant, has been rejected by the lower court, has preferred this revision petition. The amount the plaintiff sought to recover represents the principal and interest due to him from the defendant towards telephone charges from April, 1956 to 7th September 1956; the principal amount being Rs. 900-56 Ps.2. The plaintiff was a resident of a house in Vijayawada bearing Municipal Door No. 6/142. He applied for and was given a telephone connection in the year 1853. The defendant is a firm located in the building in the same town bearing door No. 11-25-22 and situated within 60 yards from the plaintiff's building. The defendant requested the plaintiff that the telephone might be installed in its building so that it could use it for its rice export business. As the plaintiff had no immediate need for a telephone he acceded to ...
Radha Bai Vs. Banka Chinnayya and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-1967
Reported in: AIR1968AP353
Seshachalapati, J. 1. This revision petition originally was heard by our learned Brother, Venkatesam, J. The scope and effect of Section 89 (2) of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') fell to be decided by him. In the arguments addressed before the learned Judge, various decisions of this Court were cited including two unreported Bench decisions, viz., G. Veera Ready v. B. Venkayya, C.M.P. No. 5309 of 1960 in C.R.P. No. 2089 of 1957 (A.P.) and T. Shankaraiah v. Laxmamma, C.R.P. No. 1911 of 1963 (A.P.). The first-decision was not brought to the notice of the Bench that decided the second case and also certain earlier decisions were pot brought to the notice of the Bench that decided the first case. The learned Judge though) that there was a conflict between the two unreported Bench decisions relating, to a matter of procedure and referred the revision petition to a Full Bench for disposal. 2. The facts leadin...
Dhulipalli Subbarao Vs. the Siddappa Dharmakunta, Muppuram and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-1967
Reported in: AIR1971AP262
ORDER1. This is a revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. The defendant is the petitioner. The plaintiff-respondent is the Siddappa Dharmakunta, Muppavaram represented by its trustees. By a registered deed dated 4-8-1958 an extent of Ac. 3-14 cents of land was leased to the petitioner for a period of five years, the maktha stipulated being Rs. 340/- per annum. Though the term of the lease was five years the tenancy continued by virtue of Section 10 (2) of the Andhra Tenancy Act, read with Act II of 1963 was, The maktha for the year 1962-1963 was, under the terms of the lease payable on 1-7-1962. But it was not so paid. On 17-4-1963 the respondent issued a notice to the petitioner calling upon him to pay the arrears of maktha. The maktha was paid on 27-4-1963. Thereafter the respondent filed an application under Section 13 (a) of the Andhra Tenancy Act for terminating the tenancy and eviction of the petitioner. The application was contested by the petitioner ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›