Andhra Pradesh Court February 1966 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Kanakaiah Textiles and Co. Vs. Vallabhaneni Venkata Subbamma and an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-08-1966
Reported in: AIR1968AP272; 1964CriLJ642
1. The short point that falls for determination in this Letters Patent Appeal is whether the surety bond furnished by Vallabhaneni Raghavayya in the Sub Court, Vijayawada, in O.S. No. 22/1953 enures to the benefit of the decree holder appellant after the transfer of the said suit to the District Munsifs Court, Vijayawada. In order to appreciate this point, we have to refer to certain facts:2. The appellant herein, a firm carrying on business at Vijayawada filed a suit in the Subordinate Judges court at Vijayawada for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 4,000 and odd in January 1953. While the suit was pending in that court, the plaintiff-appellant applied for the attachment of the properties of the defendants in the suit. One Vallabhaneni Raghavayya, the predecessor in interest of the respondents in this appeal, filed a surety bond of immoveable property for a sum of Rs. 4,800 Ex. A-1 and the bond was accepted and the properties of the defendants were released from attachment on 17-12-1953. M...
B. Raja Rao Vs. Yesu Manu and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-1966
Reported in: AIR1967AP276
Narasimham, J.(1) This is a reference under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act. The petition was presented by the husband under Section 10 of the said Act for dissolution of his marriage with the first respondent on the ground of her being in adultery with the second respondent. The first respondent denied the allegations of adultery and denied also that she had eloped with second respondent and had been living with him. The second respondent, the alleged adulterer was ex parte. The petitioner examined P. Ws. 2 and 3. The first respondent and the second respondent were ex parte at the trial. The learned District Judge accepted the petitioner's case and granted a decree for dissolution of the marriage as prayed for subject to confirmation by this Court.(2) We have perused the record of the case and heard Mr. Narasimhacharya, the learned counsel for the petitioner. We find that the case of the petitioner is borne out by the evidence that he has adduced. We may briefly refer to the evid...
Rajab Ali Pirani Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-1966
Reported in: [1967]19STC312(AP)
Sharfuddin Ahmed, J.1. The appellant instituted a suit against the Government of Andhra Pradesh, through the Chief Secretary (O.S. No. 88/1 of 1956) before the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, for the recovery of certain amounts from the sales tax department. It was stated that the plaintiff was a registered partnership firm carrying on business in the manufacture and sale of agricultural implements. For the year 1950-51 the Sales Tax Officer (C) Circle, Secunderabad, had wrongfully levied a tax of Rs. 2,344 and for the subsequent year a sum of Rs. 5,208. The assessments were ex parte and though the appellant preferred an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner, it was dismissed without going into the merits of the case. A revision was filed and even there the appellant was unsuccessful. Later he filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution; but the High Court without going into the merits of the case, dismissed the writ petition mainly on the groun...
K. Venkata Subrahmanyam and anr. Vs. Premier Bank of India, Nellore an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-02-1966
Reported in: AIR1968AP94
Manohar Pershad, C.J.1. L.P.As. Nos. 59 to 61 of 1963 arise out of C.M.A. Nos. 419 and 420 of 1960 and 45 of 1961 respectively, while C.M.S.A. Nos. 65 of 1962 and 16 to 18 of 1963 arise out of A.S. Nos. 70 and 174 of 1961 and 89 and 90 of 1962 respectively on the file of the District Court, Nellore. In all these matters the appellants are the judgment debtors. C.M.S.A. No. 9 of 1962 is on behalf of the decree-holder, which arises out of A.S. No. 272 of 1960 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Nellore.2. We would first take up the L.P.As. and C.M.S.As. filed by the judgment-debtors.3. The facts giving rise to these proceedings are: The Premier Bank of India, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Bank), registered under the Companies Act of 1913, was carrying on both banking and chit fund business at its branch at Nellore. In 1953, the Reserve Bank of India intimated to the Bank not to carry on the chit-fund business as it was prohibited by Sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Ba...
Kapurchand Shrimal Vs. Tax Recovery Officer, Hyderabad, and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-1966
Reported in: [1967]64ITR1(AP)
MANOHAR PERSHAD C.J. - This writ appeal is directed against the judgment of our learned brother, Jaganmohan Reddy J., dismissing Writ Petition No. 1274 of 1965, filed by the appellant herein seeking to prohibit the respondents, viz., the Tax Recovery Officer, the Joint-Collector, Hyderabad, and the Income-tax Officer, Central Circle, Hyderabad, from giving effect to the order of the first respondent, dated August 10, 1965, as confirmed by the Joint-collector, Hyderabad, by his order, dated September 3, 1965, to arrest and detain him in civil prison as a defaulter, under rule 73 of the Income-tax Rules (hereinafter called 'the Rules') in Schedule II to the Income-tax Act (XLIII of 1961) (hereinafter called 'the Act').It will be appropriate to refer to the various averments and allegations made in the affidavits of the parties in so far as they are relevant for the determination of the contentions urged before us.The appellants was originally assessed for the year 1955-56 to a tax of Rs....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›