Andhra Pradesh Court April 1965 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhupatiraju Narasimha Raju Vs. the Commissioner of Gift Tax, Andhra Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP39
Krishna Rao, J.1. These two cases, which have been referred to us under Section 26(1) of the Gift Tax Act, (18 of 1958), relate to three settlement deeds dated 20-5-1957, 11-10-1957 and 20-1-1959 executed by Sri Bhupatiraju Venkata Narasimha Raju hereafter mentioned as the assessee. By the first settlement deed, he gave absolutely, out of paternal affection 11 items of land of the total extent of Ac. 17-68 cents, stated to be his immoveable property to his first three unmarried minor daughters, Kausalya, Krishnaveni and Prabhavathi, represented by their mother Appallanarasaiah as guardian. By the second settlement deed he similarly gave 7 items of land of the total extent of Ac. 7-28 (which appears to be a mistake for Ac. 6-79 cents) described as being in his possession and enjoyment as of right, to his three minor sons, Venkata Appalaraju. Satyanarayana Raju and Sriharibabu, represented by their mother Appalanarasiah as guardian. By the third settlement deed, he similarly gave 4 items...
In Re: S. Seshagirirao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP137; 1966CriLJ512
ORDERAnantanarayana Ayyar, J.1. The petitioner gave a complaint to the Police. After investigation, the Police filed a charge-sheet. The Assistant Sessions Judge, Guntur tried the accused. Ultimately, he convicted the accused and sentenced him. At the trial, the petitioner complainant deposed as P.W. 1. The accused filed an appeal before the Sessions Judge, Guntur and were completely acquitted by him. Thereupon, the petitioner filed Criminal Revision Petition in this court praying for revision of the lower appellate Court's judgment of acquittal. Along with the revision petition, he filed a certified copy of the judgment of the lower appellate court but he did not file a certified copy of the judgment of the trial court. When the office required him to file a certified copy duly stamped, he came forward with a contention that he was not bound to furnish a certified copy. Therefore, the office put up the matter before me for hearing.2. The petitioner produced a copy of the trial court's...
Bank of Chittoor Ltd., Chittoor by Its Manager Sri V.R. Doraiswami Ayy ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP163
Venkatesam, J. 1. This appeal by the plaintiff is directed against the decree and judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Chittoor in O. S. No. 13 of 1960 on bis file. The short facts are as follows:2. Defendants 2 and 3 are the sons of the first defendant, Appalaswamy Naidu, and all of them were members of a joint Hindu family whose affairs were managed by defendants J and 2. For the purpose of family necessity defendands 1 and 2 borrowed from the Bank of Chit-four Limited (hereinafter referred to us the Bank) a sum of Rs. 10,000 under a promissory note, Exhibit A. 1, dated 19-9-1949, re-payable with interest at 9 per cent, per annum, and as collateral security for its due re-payment, pledged under Exhibil A 2 of oven date a Cinema projector and other accessories belonging to deiendants 1 to 3 described in the schedule attached to Exhibit A. 2. In respect of the amount due under Exhibit A.1. defendants 1 and 2 on behalf of themselves and the third defendant executed a fresh promiss...
Kallappa Vs. Sangamma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP181
ORDERAnantanarayana Ayyar, J.1. This petitioner filed a Second Appeal against the Judgment of the learned District Judge, Medak in A. S. No. 33 of 1961 He did not file printed copies of the judgment. He filed this petition under Section 151 C. P. C praying as follows:'The appellant has not been able to get printed copies from lower Court. He was supplied with only typed and manuscript copies. He is too poor to bear additional expenditure. He. therefore, prays that printed copies be dispensed with and typed copies be accepted.'The Office raised an objection saying that the High Court had no power to dispense with printed copies of the Judgment under Order 42, Rules 2 and S C. P. C. At the request of the learned advocate for the appellant the matter is posted before me for hearing.2. The short question is whether the High Court can dispense with printed copies of the judgment and accept typed copies in their place. The total number of typed pages of the judgment of the appellate Court an...
Bhupathiraju Narasimharaju Vs. Commissioner of Gift-tax, Andhra Prades ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1965
Reported in: [1966]59ITR178(AP)
KRISHNA RAO J. - These two cases, which have been referred to us under section 26(1) of the Gift-tax Act (18 of 1958), relate to three settlement deeds dated May 20, 1957, October 11, 1957, and January 26, 1959, executed by Sri Bhupatiraju Venkata Narasimharaju, hereinafter mentioned as the assessee. By the first settlement deed, he gave absolutely, out of paternal affection, 11 items of land of the total extent of Ac. 17-68 cents, stated to be his immovable property, to his first three unmarried minor daughters, Kausalya, Krishnaveni and Prabhavathi represented by their mother, Appalanarasaiah, as guardian. By the second settlement deed, he similarly gave 7 items of land of the total extent of Ac. 7-28 cents (which appears to be a mistake for Ac. 6-79 cents) described as being in his possession and enjoyment as of right, to his 3 minor sons, Venkata Appalaraju, Satyanarayanaraju and Sirharibabu, represented by their mother, Appalanarasaiah, as guardian. By the third settlement deed, h...
Natarajan (R.) and ors. Vs. Regional Assistant Commissioner of Labour ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1965
Reported in: (1966)ILLJ310AP
Chandrasekhara Sastri, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of our learned brother, Gopal Rao Ekbote, J., dismissing the Writ Petition No. 1501 of 1963. There were as many as 41 petitioners in the writ petition. They prayed for the issue of a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the respondents from giving effect to the settlement dated 20 December 1963 entered into between the Praga Tools Corporation, Ltd., and the Praga Tools Employees' Union.2. The petitioners were the employees of the Praga Tools Corporation, Ltd. (hereinafter called the company), which is respondent 2 in the writ petition, represented by its managing director, Respondent 1 is the Regional Assistant Commssioner of Labour, Hyderabad, and respondent 3 is the Praga Tools Employees' Union, represented by its president, Sri N. Satyanarayana Reddi. The company has two rival workmen's unions. The one known as Praga Tools Employees' Union (hereinafter...
Veluri Sitaramasastry and ors. Vs. Isukapalli Sundaramma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP173
ORDERAnantanarayana Ayyar, J.1. Veluri Gopalakrishna Murthy filed O. S. No. 17 of 1948 in the Court of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Eluru praying for partition of plaint Schedule properties and for separate possession of his share. His brother, Veluri Seetharama Sastry, filed O. S. No. 18 of 1948 for partition & for separate possession of his share. Each of them asked for share out of joint family property which originally belonged to the joint family of their father. V. Buchanna Sastry (V. B. S.) and three sons including the two plaintiffs. The learned Subordinate Judge tried the two suits together and awarded a decree regarding certain items. Krishnarnurty filed A. S. No. 105 of 1953 and Seetharama Sastry filed A. S. No. 180 of 1953 in the District Court, West Godavari. The learned Additional District Judge, West Godavari heard the two appeals together and passed a common judgment in which he held that the alienations under two documents (Exs. B. 20 and B. 19) regarding item 9 in...
The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by the District Collector, Gun ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-07-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP233; [1966]36CompCas950(AP)
Venkatesam, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the State of Andhra Pradesh under Section 202 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order of the learned District Judge, Guntur, in I. A. No. 336 of 1959 in O. P. No. 165 of 1955.2. The facts necessary for a determination of the questions in controversy may briefly be stated: One Sri Rajah Ravu Janardhana Krishna Rangarao Bahadur Varu filed a petition under Sections 229 and 233 of the Act and under Sections 67 to 104 of the Transfer of Property Act requesting the court to decide the question of priority between the first mortgagees viz. the debenture holders of the Guntur Vegetable Oil Industries Ltd., under liquidation (hereinafter called the Company) and me Government. The case of the petitioner is that he was the secured creditor of the Company being the holder of 200 first mortgage debentures bearing Nos. 101 to 300 and that the East Asiatic Investment Com puny Ltd., the 3rd respondent in the ...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Vs. Narayanal Da ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-06-1965
Reported in: [1967]63ITR546(AP)
Krishna Rao, J.(1) This is a reference under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act (XI of 1922) and arises out of an application made under Section 26-A of that Act by the respondent, M/s. Narayanalal Darak, hereinafter called the assessee firm, to the Income Tax Officer, Special Survey Circle, Hyderabad. The question referred is 'whether the assessee firm is entitled to registration for the assessment year 1958-59?'.(2) The assessee firm was constituted under a deed of partnership dated 6-12-1956 to do business in kapas, cotton, cotton seed etc., and was duly registered with the registered of firms on 10-6-1957. The document states the names of the partners, their initial contributions of the capital and their shares of the profits and losses as follows:-1. Shir Narayanlal Darak, Rs. 35,000-00. 0-6-0.2. Smt. Godavari Devi. 10,000-00. 0-3-0.3. Smt. Shanta Devi. 1,500-00. 0-1-6.4. Smt. Leela Devi. 1,500-00. 0-1-65. Smt. Padma Devi. 1,500-00. 0-1-6.6. Shri Baburao Narayanarao Phatak...
Abburi Rangamma Vs. Chitrapu Venupurnachandra Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-05-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP325
Ekbote, J.1. This second appeal has come to us on a reference made by our learned brother, Chandrasekhara Sastry, J. The question which has to be necessarily answered in this enquiry is whether the plaintiff, who had earlier instituted a suit for mesne profits of an immovable property and had omitted to sue for recovery of possession, if institutes a second suit for recovery of possession, such a suit is barred by Order 2, Rule 2 C.P.C. The material facts in order to appreciate the merits of the contention in this regard may briefly be stated.2. One Abburi Venkata Subbarayudu had two wives. By his first wife he had one son, Raghava Rao and one daughter, Damayanthamma Raghavarao was married, but did not have any issue. He subsequently died leaving his widow, The plaintiff is the son of Damayanthamma, the daughter. The 1st defendant who is the appellant before us is the second wife.3. The plaintiff basing his claim on a will dated 29-8-1932 executed by Abburi Venkata Subbarayudu under wh...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »