Andhra Pradesh Court February 1965 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pyndah Venkatanarayana Vs. G.V. Sudhakar Rao and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-1965
Reported in: AIR1967AP111
Kumarayya, J.(1) This appeal is from the order of the Election Tribunal, Hyderabad dismissing the Election Petition No. 357/1962 filed by the appellant questioning the election of the 2nd respondent herein (S. Malkonda Reddy) and praying that the election of respondents 1, 2 or any other respondent be declared void and the appellant be declared duly elected to one of the ten seats of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council.(2) The appellant was one of the 13 candidates duly nominated to contest for one of the ten seats in the biennial election to the Andhra Pradesh Council by the members of the legislative Assembly which was held on 25-6-1962. The election to these seats was based on the principle of proportional representation by a single transferable vote. The process involved is elaborate and the task of the Returning Officer particularly is rather arduous, the principle underling the system being that it is not sufficient that every citizen should have the vote but he should also be...
Zohra Begum Alias Aysha Begum Vs. Mohamed Ghouse Qadri Qadeeri and anr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-23-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP50; 1966CriLJ129
ORDERJaganmohan Reddy, J. 1. The Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad has made this reference for quashing the order of the II City Magistrate, who set aside an ex parte order for maintenance under Section 488(1) Cr. P. C. after the period of limitation had expired, viz., after five month) from the date of the order.2. It may be stated that the husband-respondent when he was given the summons for service stated that he being a Government servant the same should be served through the Department and as such refused to accept the summons. The Process Server in his affidavit stated that he had read out the contentions of the summons and since he did not accept the service, made a report accordingly. The respondent was treated as ex parte and a maintenance of Rs. 75 was awarded to the revision petitioner by an order dated 10th June 1963. An application by the respondent was made on 9-10-1963 to set aside the ex parte order and without any notice to the revision petitioner the Magistrate on ...
In Re: Yendra Narasimha Murthy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-23-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP131; 1966CriLJ509
The accused, Yendra Narasimha Murthy, who was a travelling photographer, after killing the deceased (Khammammettu Manikyam) went to a Judicial Second Class Magistrate (P.W. 13) of his own accord and expressed his desire to make a statement. P.W. 13 recorded the statement (Ex. P. 6) of the accused, read it over to him (accused) and the latter admitted it to be correct and signed the same. Subsequently the Magistrate informed the police and the accused was arrested. After investigation the accused was put on trial under charges under Section 302 I.P.C. Ex. P. 6 was sought to he admitted against the accused.)1-22. Anantanarayana Ayyar, J.x x x x x23. Item (1): Ex. P. 6 is a most important piece of evidence and if runs as follows:'Myself and a jewel merchant Tatayya killed Kammamettu Manikyam of Kotapadu village by twisting her neck near the tank which is by the side of Annapurna Talkies after one reel of first show was over. I kept thai girl for some time. I went away after 5 years when i...
B. Aswartha Reddy and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-23-1965
Reported in: AIR1966AP204; 1966CriLJ741
Chandrasekhara Sastry, J. 1. In this is appeal and the petition, the validity of a proclamation made under Section 15 of the Police AL-I (Act V of 1861.) so far as it relates to the apportionment and exemptions made uder Sub Section (3), (4) and (5) of Section 15 of the said Ad is challenged as offending the fundamental right guaranteed under Article ]4 of the Constitution of India. The main facts that led to the finding of this appeal and the petition are the same There me two factions in the village of Narayanareddipalli. Tadipatri taluk. Anantapur District. The Station House Officer. Muchukota put up security eases M. C. Nos, 15/63 and 16/63 on the file of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Anantapnr, against the members belonging to the two factions. The appellants in the appeal seven in number, were respondents 3 to 7, 9 and 11 in M. C. 15/63. The petitioners in W. P. No. 1535/64 were also respondents in the said case. There were in all 38 respondents in M. C, 15/63. It was alleged ag...
Sri Raja Vatsavaya Venkata Suryanarayana Jagapathi Raju Bahadur Vs. th ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-23-1965
Reported in: AIR1965AP451
Chandrasekhara Sastry, J. (1) This civil miscellaneous appeal came up for hearing before our learned brother, Venkatesam, J., who, by his order, dates 13-8-64, directed the case to be posted before a Bench for disposal, as he felt that an authoritative decision on the points arising in this appeal is necessary. (2) The appeal is filed against the order of the Subordinate Judge, Kakinada, in E. A. No. 1130/62, filed by the Official Receiver, East Godavari, in O. S. No. 85/57 under Ss. 38. 47, 151 and O. 21, R. 58, C. P. C. and S. 52 of the Provincial Insolvency Act praying in E. P. No. 268/62 to the Official Receiver for administration on the insolvency side. The Subordinate Judge ordered that the execution so far as the judgment-debtors 1, 2 and 5 to 8 are concerned, who were not insolvents, should be stopped and that the property belonging to the judgment-debtors 1 and 2 and should be delivered to the Official Receiver. In I. P. No. 16/64, one Kancherla Achiraju alias Bulli Jaggayya, ...
Khan Bahadur Ahmed AllauddIn and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-23-1965
Reported in: [1966]62ITR490(AP)
KRISHNA RAO, J. - The assessee is a registered firm consisting of three partners. During the accounting year that ended on September 30, 1958, which is the previous year for the assessment year 1959-60, the assessee firm carried on the business of manufacture and sale of ice and aerated waters and also acted as the managing agents of the Hyderabad Allwyn Metal Works Ltd., hereinafter called the company. Under clause (1) of the managing agency agreement dated February 6, 1942, the assessee-firm had been appointed as the managing agents of the company for a period of thirty years, subject to the condition that it shall continue to hold the companys shares of not less than O. S. Rs. 1,00,000. The assessee-firm purchased 2,000 shares of O. S. Rs. 50 each in February, 1942, and 4,000 more shares of O. S. Rs. 50 each in June, 1946. In 1956, it brought down the value of the 6,000 shares to I. G. Rs. 1,80,000 and wrote off the loss against the reserves of its accumulated profits. In 1958, capi...
The Anakapalli Co-operative Marketing Society Vs. the State of Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-1965
Reported in: [1966]18STC328(AP)
Narasimham, J.1. These are revision cases preferred against the orders of the Tribunal that the Anakapalle Co-operative Marketing Society, the petitioner herein, is liable to sales tax on the turnovers of Rs. 19,21,580-6-4 and Rs. 13,11,188-5-2 for the years of assessment 1950-51 and 1951-52 respectively. There is no dispute about the turnovers as assessed ; but the legality of the levy is in question. The question arises this way.2. The Anakapalle Co-operative Marketing Society consists of over 1,000 jaggery producing ryots as members. It was registered under the Co-operative Societies Act and it held a licence as commission agent under Section 8 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act. The members of the society, who produced jaggery from the sugarcane grown by them in their own lands or in their leasehold lands, effected sales of jaggery through the agency of the society and received the price less an agreed commission payable to the society on the sale price. While so, in October, 1950...
In Re: Saradamma and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-18-1965
Reported in: AIR1965AP444; 1965CriLJ709
ORDER(1) Crl. M. P. No. 189 of 1965 was filed by Saradamma the 5th accused in P. R. C. 27 of 1964 on the file of the Judicial Second Class Magistrate, Cuddapah. Crl. M. P. No. 192 of 1965 was filed on behalf of A-2, A-6 and A-7 in the same case. The learned Sessions Judge of Cuddapah granted bail to all these accused on condition that they should confine their movements to the municipal limits of the Cuddapah town during the pendency of the sessions case and report themselves to the police station twice every day. These petitions are filed contending that the order imposing those conditions is illegal.(2) In order to appreciate the contention advanced, a few facts may be stated. These petitioners and three others were charged under Ss. 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 I. P. C. Accused 3 and 9 are not yet apprehended. The first accused had not applied for bail at all. The present petitioners were granted bail subject to the conditions aforesaid.(3) The contention of Mr. Hasan, the learned counse...
Sri Ramalingeswaraswamy Baru Temple Vs. Ravuru Seetharamaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-1965
Reported in: AIR1967AP46
ORDER(1) Originally there were a suit and cross suit, O.S. No. 181/50 and O.S. No. 111/51, one by the Archaka and the other by the trustee of the temple of Sri Ramalingeswara Swami Varu at Satharavur, Guntur District. The Archaka claimed AC. 27-66 cents of land as his service inam; whereas, the trustees claimed that the entire extent was an endowment the temple. The Subordinate Judge's Court Bapatla, by its judgment and decree, dated 6-3-52 held that the Archaka was entitled to 8/5ths of the entire extent as remuneration for his services and that the trustee on behalf of the temple was entitled to 2/5hrs.Against the decree, there were two appeals to the High Court of Andhra, A.S. Nos. 658/53 and 272/54, which were subsequently taken on file by this High Court. When the appeals came up for hearing the Counsel appearing for the Archaka and the trustee reported that the dispute between the parties was settled out of Court and that the appeals were not pressed. Accordingly, the appeals wer...
R. Narapa Reddy Vs. Jagarlamudi Chandramouli and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-10-1965
Reported in: AIR1967AP219; 1967CriLJ984
P. Satyanarayana Raju, C.J.(1) These two contempt cases are connected and it will be convenient to deal with them together as they both arise out of exactly that me facts.(2) In C. C. No. 19 of 1964 the petitioner is Sri R. Narapa Reddy. There are ten respondents. They are: (1) Sri Jagarlamudi Chandramouli; (2) Sri A. Sanjeevaiah, (3) Sri M. Seshagirirao, (4) Sri Medarametla Rosayya, (5) Sri Muvva Ramachandrayya, (6) Sri K. Sreeramamurty, (7) Sri Karasala Singayya Chowdary; (8) Sri P. Kondiah; (9) Sri Chintapalli Jagannadharao and (10) Sri Patibandla Sivaligaiah.(3) In C. C. No. 20 of 1964 the petitioner is Sri Jagarlamudi Chandramouli. The respondents are Sri T. Chakra Reddy and Sri J. Rajasekhara Reddy. Additional District Munsif, Guntur.(4) We may briefly sketch the sequence of events culminating in the present cases in order to explain how the alleged contempts arise.(5) The Guntur District Co-operative Marketing Society Limited, Guntur (hereinafter referred to as the District Mark...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »