Andhra Pradesh Court December 1964 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T. Saroja David Vs. Christie Francis
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-04-1964
Reported in: AIR1966AP178
ORDERJaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This is a petition by the wife for declaring her marriage to be null and void on the ground that she was forced to enter into marriage with the respondent. According to the petition and the evidence of the petitioner It appears that the petitioner who was born on 4-3-1933 was about 16 years in 1949 studying in school. Proposal for marriage with the respondent was brought by her parents, but the petitioner resisted the same and expressed her unwillingness to enter into the marriage. Notwithstanding this, her parents set their minds to get through this marriage and on the marriage day in spite of her protest, her father, mother and sister forcibly prepared her for it and wanted to take her to the church. Even there she protested and refused to get into car. But the parents forced her in the car and forced, her out of it at the church. Even at the church, according to the evidence of the petitioner, she refused to sign the register and again the father of the g...
Sampalli Hanumant Rao Vs. Sampalli Amrutamma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-1964
Reported in: AIR1966AP221
ORDERSharfuddin Ahmed, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the District Judge, Warangal, dared 3rd August, 1961 made in Appeal Suit No. 32 of 1900, whereby the judgment and decree of the Principal Munsiff, Warangal made in O. S. No. 87 of 1958 dated 12th August. 1960, has been confirmed.2. The petitioner herein instituted a suit, O. S. No. 87 of 1958 on the file of the Principal Munsiff, Warangal, for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 871-7-0 alleging that the husband of the respondent had entered into a sale agreement with him in respect of it certain piece of land, but instead of delivering possession of the same he had filed a suit for declaration of permanent injunction against him in O. S. No. 50/1 of 1956 and thereby prevented him from taking possession of the suit land. He was, therefore entitled to recover the amount advanced by him to the husband of the respondent Inwards the sale price. The defendant-respondent contested the suit and inter alia pleaded the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›