Andhra Pradesh Court June 1959 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Rangamannar Chetty, Proprietor Sri Satyanarayana Rice Mill, Nellore ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-30-1959
Reported in: AIR1960AP371; (1959)IILLJ656AP
ORDERMohd. Ahmed Ansari, J.1. The writ petitioner is the proprietor of Sri Satyanarayana Rice Mill, where one Sastry was Retting a salary of Rs. 60 as a mechanic. The latter had been on leave from May 16. 1956 and was after his return on June 1, 1956 informed that he was not required. A dispute thereafter developed between the workmen and employer of the aforesaid Rice Mill, and conciliation proceedings before the Labour Officer were started. At one stage during those proceedings the employer had agreed to take the mechanic back; but it was alleged that he went back on his promise. Eventually two questions were referred to the Industrial Tribunal.The first of these is whether the dismissal ofSri Swamy Sastry is justified and the second is, towhat relief he would be entitled. Before the Tribunal the position taken by the employer was thatSastry had been dismissed after notice, that heused to be absent for long period without takingleave, that he had spoiled the machinery and thathe work...
Venigalla Ramakrishnaiah Vs. Pillutla Sitaramasastry.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-30-1959
Reported in: [1960]40ITR708(AP)
SRINIVASACHARI, J. - The plaintiff is the Appellant and this appeal arises out of a suit filed by him for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 28,258,-8-0 by way of reimbursement on the ground that he paid income-tax on the income derived from motor bus M.D.G. 95 which he purchased from the defendant. The plaintiffs allegation is that the defendant was liability to pay the amount of income-tax and inasmuch as he paid the amount in order to save the property from being sold by restraint and other process that might be adopted by the Income-tax authorities he was entitled to be reimbursed The defendant was a shareholder along with others in company called sri. Seetharam Motor Transport Company. In 1945 or about the composite State of Madras issued a G.O. to the effect that permits for plying of buses would be issued only to persons who were owners of a fleet of buses, that is to say, who owner 20 buses and more. As it was not possible for individuals to own 20 buses, a number of owners of buses ...
In Re: Burre Baluga and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-1959
Reported in: AIR1960AP315; 1960CriLJ788
Manoher Pershad, J.1. In the village Kodapgal on 12-1-1959 one Satcli Balayya was found murdered. P. W. 4 Baganna informed the police patel about the incident stating that Burre Butugu, Jogi Maisanna, Sakali Eriga and Ramudu were responsible for the murder. The matter was investigated. The said four persons were charge-sheeted under Sections 302 and 302 read with Section 34 I. P. G. for the said murder. The case was committed to the Sessions where on behalf o the prosecution in all 19 witnesses were examined. The accused denied the charges, but did not produce any defence evidence. On the evidence produced, the learned Sessions Judge found the accused guilty and sentenced each of them to death and has sent the record for confirmation which is before us now. The accused also have filed separate appeal. 2. The case of the prosecution was that the accused armed with axe, sword and lathi attacked the deceased and killed him. The motive alleged for the crime was that there was a dispute bet...
Ramadoss (K.) Vs. Commissioner, Vizianagaram Municipality and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-29-1959
Reported in: (1959)IILLJ562AP
ORDERMohammad Ahmed Ansari, J.1. The petitioner is a teacher in municipal high school, Vizianagaram, and seeks to vacate an order by the commissioner of the Vizianagaram municipality of May 1951. The petitioner further seeks to quash two other orders that are of 3 October 1955 and 11 August 1956. These have dismissed his appeals against the main order, the earlier being by the Government, and the latter by the Governor.2. The several facts in support of the prayer for certiorari are contained in the affidavit accompanying the petition. It states that the petitioner was promoted as the headmaster of the municipal high school, Kaspa, by the commissioner through his order dated 2 May 1949; and on 9 May 1951 the commissioner passed another order reverting him as assistant. The order was without any notice to show cause and in violation of the statutory rules relating to the appointment and punishment of officers and servants of the municipal council. Other relevant facts are that as one Sa...
Public Prosecutor, Andhra Pradesh Vs. Viswanatham Chetty and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-1959
Reported in: AIR1960AP96; 1960CriLJ212
Sanjeeva Row Nayudu, J.1. This Criminal appeal by the State is directed against the Judgment and order of the Judl. 1st Class Magistrate, Adoni, acquitting respondents 1 and 2, (hereinafter referred to as the first accused and the second accused respectively) on charges under Section 16(1)(i) read with Section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, (Central Act XXXVII of 1954).2. The facts of the case relating to this appeal are as follows: The Food Inspector attached to the Adoni Municipality examined in the case as P.W. 1, proceeded to the shop of the first accused who was a dealer in food-stuffs and provisions like ghee etc., and on 29-5-1957 at about 10 a.m. purchased one seer of ghee from the second accused paying Rs. 1-4-0. He obtained a receipt from the second accused marked as Ex. P-l in the case. The ghee that was sold to him was taken out of a tin of ghee which was lying in the shop. Having thus purchased the ghee in question and obtained the receipt Ext. P-1, P.W. l p...
Sri Rama Sugars and Industries, Ltd. (by Manager C. Atchuta Rao) Vs. I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-1959
Reported in: (1959)IILLJ712AP
ORDERMohammed Ahmed Ansari, J.1. These two petitions seek to vacate two orders by the industrial tribunal, whereby permissions asked for under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, XIV of 1947, have been refused. The writ petitioner, Sri Rama Sugars and Industries, Ltd., Bobbin, is the employer of the respondent 2 to each writ petition, Gantada Atohayya in W.P. No. 796 and I.V. Raju in W.P. No. 795. The former is a boiler-attender, and I.V. Raju is a permanent attender of the mills. Their employers had on 8 February 1957 framed charges against the boiler-attender for assaulting and hurting at 8 p.m. on 2 February 1957 one Venkat Rao, another employee of the company. Two further charges for sleeping while on duty on 4 February 1957 and for using abusive language against his superiors on 5 February 1957 were also framed against the same employee. On the same date I.V. Raju was chargesheeted for having abetted when the other employee was being beaten and also for actually assaulting....
Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Augustus (K.)
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-15-1959
Reported in: (1959)IILLJ264AP
Sanjeeva Rao Nayudu, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Additional City Magistrate, Division No. II, City Criminal Court, Hyderabad, acquitting the respondent herein under Section 245(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellant is the complainant in the case, viz., the Employees' State Insurance Corporation represented by its Insurance Inspector, Aziz Quareshi.2. The only ground on which the acquittal is based is that the complaint in the case is barred by limitation because it was filed beyond six months from the last date of the expiry of the quarter in respect of which contribution had to be made, although the complaint was within six months from the last date on which the accused could have made the contribution. The learned Magistrate fell into the error of thinking that the thirty days' period given to the employer to make the contribution is a period of grace and that it should not be excluded in counting the six months' period provided by...
Employees, State Insurance Corporation Per Its Insurance Inspector, Az ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-05-1959
Reported in: AIR1960AP455; 1960CriLJ1184
Sanjeeva Row Nayudu, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Court of the Additional Munsif and First Class Magistrate, Secunderabad dated the 27th March 1958, made in Criminal Case No. 460/3 of 1957, finding the accused not guilty of charges under Section 86(2) of the Em-ployees's State Insurance Act, 1948 and ordering dismissal of the complaint made by the complainant in the case.2 The complaint in this case was preferred by one Insurance Inspector, Aziz Qureshi, on behalf of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation at Secunderabad, against one Bade Saheb as the principal employer of Shivaji Press carrying on business at Secunderabad. The complaint was filed, under Section 86(2) of the Employees' State Insurance Act of 1948.3 The learned Additional Munsif and First Class Magistrate, Secunderabad, held that the Inspector Aziz Qureshi is only authorised under Ex. P-1 to represent the corporation in all cases falling within the jurisdiction of Mahabubnagar, ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›