Andhra Pradesh Court June 1957 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kapila Annapurnamma Vs. Panchalavarupu Venkata Satya Seeta Ramanjaneya ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-1957
Reported in: AIR1959AP40
Manohar Pershad, J. 1. The suit O. S. No. 56 of 1947 out of which these two appeals No. 159 of 1952 on behalf of the second defendant and the other No. 167 of 1952 on behalf of the plaintiff arise was filed by Poanchalavarapu Venkata Satya Sitha Ramanjaneya Ratnam for a declaration that the settlement deed dated 2-2-1942 executed between the plaintiff's father and defendants 1 to 4 was not binding on her, for possession of the B schedule properties after ejecting defendants 1 to 9, for past mesne profits to the extent of Rs. 878-11-0 from the third defendant on item 4 of the B schedule property together with future profits and interest thereon and for the recovery of the C schedule moveable properties or their value Rs. 315/-.The plaintiff in O. S. 56 of 1947 is the daughter of the 10th defendant and the widow of the late Panchalavarapu Venkata Satya Surya Prakasa Rao. The first defendant is the mother of the late Venkata Satya Surya Prakasa Rao. Defendants 2 and 3 are the sisters of t...
Dendati Sannibabu Vs. Varadapureddi Sannibabu and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-28-1957
Reported in: AIR1959AP102; 1959CriLJ167
P. Chandra Reddi, J. 1. The complainant is the appellant herein. He filed a complaint alleging that the respondents caused him hurt and wrongfully confined him, offences punishable unde Sections 323 and 342, I. P. C. The case as set up by the prosecution witnesses was this. P. W. 1 returned from the Shandy to the house of his brother at Devarapalle at about 6 p.m. on 20-8-55. When he was talking with his brother, A-5, a sweeper in the Panchayat Office, came there and asked him whether he had abused the President of the Board, This was denied by the complainant.After some time he started to go to the village. On the way, he stopped and spent some time in die house of the village-niunsif. When he left that house-and was on the outskirts of the village, A-1 to A-5 pursued him and asked him to stop. While running P. W. 1 fell down. Meanwhile, the culprits overtook him and A-1 gave a slap on the cheek and A-2 to A-5 beat him with sticks. The victim fell down in a field transplanted with pad...
The State of Andhra (Now Andhra Pradesh) Represented by the Collector ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-1957
Reported in: AIR1959AP21; [1958]9STC547(AP)
K. Subba Rao, C.J. 1. These two second appeals arise out of two connected suits, O. S. Nos. 268 and 309 of 1951 filed by the respondent against the appellant, the State of Madras, in the Court of the District Munsif, Rajahmundry,2. O. S. No. 268 of 1951 was a suit filed by the plaintiff to set aside the orders of assessment made by the Commercial Tax Officer levying from him sales tax of Rs. 2941-7-0 for the year 1947-48 in respect of the turnover relating to the sale of delivery orders as first dealer and for refund of the same. O. S. No. 309 of 1951 is a similar suit filed by him to set aside the order of assessment of the Commercial Tax Department assessing him to sales tax of Rs. 1613-12-0 for the year 1946-47 relating to the sale of delivery orders as first dealer and for refund of the same.3. The learned District Munsif held that the said sales were not sale of goods within the meaning of the General Sales Tax Act and, on that basis, decreed the suits. On appeal, the learned Sub-...
Jani Shah Vs. State
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-1957
Reported in: 1958CriLJ600
Chandra Reddy, J.1. The appellant, Jani Shah, was tried by the Sessions Judge, Mahboobnagar, for the murder of a young girl by name Yousuf Bi; he was found guilty under Section 302, Penal Code and was sentenced to death.2. The facts of the case emerging from the prosecution evidence are as follows:Yousuf Bi was the daughter of Mahbub Shah. She was living with her stepgrandmother, P.W. 9. On the 5th of August, 1956, she was found going into the house of the appellant between S P.m. and 6 p.m. Later in the evening finding that she did not return home, her grandmother, P.W. 5 searched for her in the village but could not find her. As it was night and she could not see properly she returned home. On being informed by one Sayanna, P.W. 4, that the deceased was seen by him in the house of the appellant before sunset, P.W. 5 went to the house of appellant to inquire about her grand-daughter. The appellant denied all knowledge of the movements of the deceased. Next morning coming to know that ...
Annam Adinarayana and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-21-1957
Reported in: AIR1958AP16
Subba Rao, C.J.1. The question in this reference is whether the two petitioners who were discharged fromservice by a single order could file one petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. The two petitioners were supervisors of the Market Committee, Guntur. The Government of Andhra, by their order bearing No. 87298/N/56/2, dated 11-10-1956, gave instructions to the Collector, who is the ex-pfficio Chairman of the Guntur Market Committee, to disband the additional staff immediately. Pursuant to the said instructions, the Guntur Market Committee discharged the two petitioners from service by order bearing R. C. No. 1280/, 56 A2 dated 26-10-1956.Thereafter, both the petitioners jointly filed a single petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order terminating their services. On the answer to the question whether the petitioners could file one petition in the aforesaid circumstances depends the question of court-fee for, if one petition is not...
In Re: Gaddam Jayarami Reddi and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-1957
Reported in: AIR1959AP325; 1959CriLJ808
Chandra Reddy, J.1. On 23-3-1956, one Pedda Ranga Reddy of Chitrachedu village was murdered in his own house. Alleging that it was the eight appellants and nine others who committed the offence, the police of Teliki charge-sheeted them all for various offences. The Sessions Judge of Anantapur who tried them found only Accused 1 to 8 guilty of some offence and acquitted the Test.Accused 1 to 8, the appellants before us, were convicted under Section 148 I. P. C., and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment. In addition, A-1 and A-2 were sentenced to death under Section 302 while the rest were found guilty under Section 302 read with Section 149 I. P. C., and given life imprisonment. The 3rd and 4th Accused were also convicted under Section 19 of the Indian Arms Act and sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment.2. The facts of the case for the prosecution may be briefly stated ;The village of Chitrachedu was torn by factions one headed by the deceased and his son P.W. 1 while A-l...
Penumarti Janikamma Vs. Chunduru Appanna
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-17-1957
Reported in: 1957CriLJ1208
ORDERKumarayya, J.1. The petitioner is one of the accused persons in a Criminal case (CO, No. 432 of 1956), instituted by the respondent and now pending before the Additional First Class Magistrate, Rajabmundry. She is the mother-in-law of the respondent. She has in turn brought a suit O. S. No. 399 of 1956 on the file of the District Munsiff's Court, Kakinada as the next friend of her minor daughter for her maintenance, against the respondent, the husband of the minor.The Criminal case related to an offence under Sections 494 and 494 read with Section 109, I. P. C., in relation to her minor daughter, Chandra Laxmi, and it was instituted earlier than the civil suit. It appears that six witnesses have already been examined on behalf of the complainant and only one or two witnesses are yet to be examined. There civil suit is at its initial stages.The petitioner herein applied, under Section 344, Criminal P. C., for stay of the Criminal proceedings, pending the civil suit. But the learned...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›