Andhra Pradesh Court April 1957 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
In Re: Kasaboyina Muttiga and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-19-1957
Reported in: 1958CriLJ596
Kumarayya, J.1. The Sessions Judge, Karimnagar, has convicted Kasa Boyina Muttiga of Lingapur and Alwala Narasimhulu of Nizamabad under Section 302, Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to death. He has also convicted them under Sections 392 and 457, Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to five years' rigorous imprisonment and 14 years' rigorous imprisonment respectively. The file is before us for confirmation of death sentence. The accused also have filed their appeals against their convictions. This judgment will govern all the three proceedings.2. The facts, according to the prosecution, story are: that the two accused together with one Kottapalli Narasimhulu (the approver), a Harijan of Narlapur, conspired to murder a wealthy old woman, Gudeti Venku, living alone at a distant village, Lingapur in Karimnagar District. With this object in view, they started from Nizamabad accompanied by Boodiga, P.W. 18, the son of A-l on 27-6-1956.On the way, Boodiga fell ill and was therefore left ...
In Re: Mannem Edukondalu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-1957
Reported in: 1957CriLJ1086
Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This is an appeal by the accused against conviction under Section 304 para (1) of the Indian Penal Code and the sentence of 3 years R. I. passed by the Sessions Judge of Guntur. The accused was charged originally under Section 302, I. P. C., for the murder of his wife Mannem Lakshmamma by stabbing her with a knife and under Section 309 for attempting to commit suicide by stabbing himself with the same knife in his left abdomen.2. The prosecution alleged that the accused married the deceased after the death of his first wife eight years before the incident, but did not get on well with her. As a result the deceased came to live with her parents. The parents having come to know that the deceased was misbehaving with one Dhobi Narayana, P. W. 11. sent her away to Gudipudi, her husband's village.The accused and the deceased visited her parent's house to attend the marriage of the deceased's brother and sister at Ponekallu and were staying in a portion of the house oc...
Kalwa Devadatham and Others Vs. Union of India and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-1957
Reported in: [1958]33ITR56(AP)
CHANDRA REDDY, J. - These two appeals are against the judgment of the Subordinate Judge, Kurnool, in O.S. No. 52 of 1950 and No. 54 of 1949. The two suits giving rise to these appeals were instituted by the same plaintiffs for the purpose of setting aside some sales. As the subject-matter of the suits was practically the same and the plaintiffs were the same they were tried together and a common judgment was delivered.In O.S. No. 52 of 1950 the first defendant is the Union of India, defendants Nos. 2, 3 and 4 the District Collector, Kurnool, Revenue Divisional Officer, Nandyal, and the Tahsildar, Nandyal, respectively. The other defendants are the purchasers of various items of property in auction held by the revenue authorities. The suit was brought for a declaration that the assessment order made by the Income-tax Officer, Kurnool, in G.I. No. 3810/44-45, 45-46 and 46-47 are unenforceable against the suit properties of the plaintiffs and consequently the sales of those properties by ...
Narayana Rao K.V. and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-1957
Reported in: (1958)IILLJ294AP
Ansari, J.1. The two petitioners seeking writs of certiorari had been employed in the Road Transport Department, whose assets and liabilities have since been taken over by the State Road Transport Corporation K. V. Narayana Rao, who has filed W.P. No. 65 of 1957, had been a bus conductor with ten years' service. Abdul Rahim, who has filed W.P. No. 119 of 1957, was a mechanic attached to the City bus deport at Gowliguda, Hyderabad. Both were placed under suspension by two orders of one R. K. Sharman, who was then the mechanical engineer. The orders were of 24 January 1955. Both the petitioners have been later discharged from the service and their appeals against the dismissals have been rejected. The W.P. No. 64 of 1957 seeks to vacate the dismissal order of 13 September 1956 and W.P. No. 119 of 1957 prays for setting aside a similar order of 5 October 1956. The events that culminated in passing the aforesaid orders can briefly narrated.2. In 1954 a Comet Mk. I, new radiator, is alleged...
Syed Shah Gulam Ghous MohiuddIn Khamesul Qadri and ors. Vs. Syed Shah ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-1957
Reported in: AIR1959AP212
Kumarayya, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit for setting aside the decree passed on 4th Mehar 1317F., and for partition of the matruka property of late Syed Shah Abdul Rahim among his heirs in specified shares according to Mohammedan Law, which has been dismissed by the Darul Khaza Court on 24-9-1351F on the ground that such a suit was not maintainable in law. This appeal has been heard by the Division Bench of the erstwhile Hyderabad High Court and has now been referred to the under Section 8 of the Hyderabad High Court Act on account of difference of opinion between the learned Judges.2. Briefly stated the facts are: that Syed Shah Abdul Rahim the Sajjada of the Darga 'Sayyed Shah Nuruddin Saheb' situated at Nampalli, thed on 21st Aban 1314F, leaving him surviving four sons and two daughters am follows: (1) Syed Shah Ahdul Har, defendant No. 1, (2) the late Khammarunnisa Begum, mother of plaintiffs 4 and 5, (3) the late Badihunnisa Begum, mother of plaintiff No. 3, (4) the late S...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›