Andhra Pradesh Court November 1957 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jalasutram Annapurnamma Vs. Jalasutram Ramakrishna Sastry
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-1957
Reported in: AIR1959AP49
K. Subba Rao, C.J.1. This is a Letters Patent Appeal against theorder of our learned brother, Kumarayya, J. In C. M. P. No. 2779 of 1957.2. The appellant is the husband of the respondent. He filed O. P. No. 111 of 1955 and O. P. No. 5 of 1956 on the file of the Court of the District Judge of Masulipatnam for dissolution or his marriage with the respondent and obtained anorder for dissolution of the marriage. The respondent i. e., the wife, preferred C. M. A. No. 263, of 1956 against the order of the learned District Judge.Pending the appeal, she filed C. M. P. No. 2779 of 1957 for interim relief under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (XXV of 1955). The learned Judge directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs. 80/- in Court or pay the same to the counsel for the respondent in two monthly instalmentstowards expenses and to pay her maintenance atRs. 15/- per month from November, 1957.The appellant has preferred this appeal againstthat order. The Letters Patent Appeal was directed t...
Palagani Veeraraghavulu and ors. Vs. the State and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-05-1957
Reported in: 1958CriLJ603
Basi Reddy, J.1. In all these petitions, a common question as to the constitutional validity of Section 251-A of the Criminal Procedure Code has been raised. In, Cr. M. Ps. Nos. 898 and 900 of 1956, the petitioners seek the quashing of the charges framed by the Magistrate for offences under Section 409 I.P.C. In Cr. M. P. No. 891 of 1956, trie petitioners pray that the charges framed against them under Section 4(1)(b) of the Madras Prohibition Act be quashed. In Cr. M. P. No. 911 of 1956 in which a police charge-sheet has been filed for an offence under S- -324, I.P.C, the petitioner asks for a direction' to the lower Court not to follow the procedure under Section 251-A but to follow the procedure pre scribed by Sections 252 - 258, Cr.PC Suffice it to say- for purposes of determining the question raised in these petitions, that all these are warrant-cases instituted on police reports and Section 251 enacts that:In the trial of warrant-cases by Magistrates, the Magistrate shall a) in a...
Adari Gangunaidu and anr. Vs. Lakkoju Narayanamurthy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-05-1957
Reported in: 1958CriLJ730
Subba Rao, C.J.1. (Crl. R. C. No. 374 of 1956) This is a criminal revision against the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapataam, directing the Judicial 1st Class Magistrate Yellamanchili, to re-entertain Criminal M. P. No. 21 of 1956 and dispose of it on merits in accordance with law.2. Criminal R. C. No. 508 of 1956 is a revision against the order of the Judicial 1st Class Magistrate, Yellamanchili in Criminal M. P. No. 2 of 1956 rejecting the petition.3. The petitioner in Criminal M. P. No. 21 of 1956 filed the said petition in the Court of the Judicial 1st Class Magistrate, Yellamanchili, against the respondents requesting the Court to file a complaint against them under Section 476, Criminal P.C. The petitioner alleged that the 1st respondent gave a written complaint falsely accusing the petitioner of house-breaking and robbery of gold jewels in his house on 26-1-1955 to the 2nd respondent, the Village Munsif of Ganaparti, who, with the knowledge that the ...
Pithapuram Taluk Tobacco, Cigars and Soda Merchants' Union Vs. State o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-1957
Reported in: [1958]9STC723(AP)
P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. These four writ petitions are directed against the State of Andhra Pradesh challenging the levy of sales tax at six pies per rupee on the turnover of cigars and cheroots sold at less than 0-2-0, bidies, snuff, chewing tobacco or any other product manufactured from tobacco, from the date on the which the Andhra Amendment Act XIV of 1955 came into force as well as the levy of sales tax on country tobacco. Writ Petitions Nos. 222 and 267 of 1957 are filed by the Presidents of Tobacco Associations who are also manufacturers of cigars, while Writ Petition No. 288 of 1957 is filed exclusively by the individual who manufactures and sells cigars and cheroots sold at less than two annas each. Writ Petition No. 317 of 1957 is filed by the President of the Tobacco Merchants Association, Rajahmundry, on behalf of the 99 members of the Association, dealers in country tobacco, cigars and cheroots, In all these petitions, the retrospective levy of sales tax on the manufactur...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›