Andhra Pradesh Court June 1955 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
In Re: Dangeti Satteyya
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-30-1955
Reported in: 1957CriLJ814
Bhimasankaram, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge of East Godavari Division at Rajahmundry, convicting the appellant of murder and sentencing him to transportation for life.2. Briefly stated, the case for the prosecution is that the appellant who belongs to the washerman caste contracted illicit intimacy with the deceased who belonged to the Setti Balija Caste that they were living together as man and wife for about five years in the village of Gummallapeta and that shortly before the occurrence the deceased fell in love with one Kommoju Suryanarayana (P. W. 14) a young man of the Kamsali community and was unfaithful to the appellant who coming to know of the betrayal, reproached her with the same, destroyed the hut they were living in and took her away elsewhere.A few days later however both the appellant and the deceased are stated to have returned to Gummallapeta village and were living in an unoccupied hut belonging to one Kondela Sathemma. It...
H.E.H. the Nizam, Rajpramukh of Hyderabad Vs. B.G. Keskar and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-10-1955
Reported in: 1955CriLJ1590
Mohd. Ahmed Ansari, J.1. These proceedings for the contempt of Court have arisen on an application filed by C. B. Tara -purwala on behalf of H.E.H. the Nizam and are directed against B. G. Keskar, as well as the proprietor or the printer of Sadhana Prin-tery. The application has asked this Court to pass appropriate orders against the aforesaid respondents for their having written, published and circulated a pamphlet entitled B. G. Keskar v. H.E.H. the Nizam. The circumstances under which the pamphlet has been written, printed and published may be given concisely.On 27-4-1954 B. G. Keskar filed a document before the District Magistrate, Hyderabad City, which the applicant in this case claims to be a complaint, but which B. G. Keskar asserts to be an information Under Section 190(1)(c), Criminal P. C. In it B. G. Keskar has alleged that Mir Os-man Ali Khan, the ex-Ruler of Hyderabad, resides in a building called Raj Bhavan in Hyderabad City and has turned it into a veritable hell for the...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›