Andhra Pradesh Court September 1954 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dodda Subbareddi Vs. Sunturu Govindareddi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-1954
Reported in: AIR1955AP49
(1) Defendant is the appellant. The respondent herein filked O. S. No. 230 of 1948 on the file of the District Munsif's Court of Tenali for recovery of possessioin of the suit property on the ground that it belonged to his maternal-grand-father. Bhavanam Venkata Reddy and after the death of his last daughter Bhusamma, he suceeded to the property as the next reversioner.(2) The defendant contended that the suit property was gifted to Subbamma, one of the daughters of Venkata Reddy by her mother, Konamma, as per the oral directions of her father, Venkata Reddy, lthat there is a family arrangement under which Subbamma's absolute rights in the suit properties were recognised and that, in any even, the plaintiff who brought about the attested the Dakhal deed dated 14-10-1906 Ex. B-7 executed by Konamma in favour of Subbamma was estopped from challenging the validity of the Dakhal deed. The defendant claimed as the donee, under Exhibit B-8 from Bakki Reddy who claimed title from Subbamma und...
Kalathooru Raghavareddi Vs. Kalathooru Venkataredii and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-1954
Reported in: AIR1955AP22
(1) This appeal is by the 1st defendant against the decree & judgment of the Court of the District Judge of Chittoor, setting aside that of the District Munsif's Court of Thirupati in O. S. No. 371 of 1945, a shit filed by the plaintiff for a declaration of their title to 5 ankanams of thatched cattle shed and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from entering the plaint schedule property. The facts of the case may be briefly stated.The plaintiffs, defendants and others constituted members of a joint Hindu family. As disputes arose between them in regard to the division of properties, they referred their disputes to three named arbitrators, A. Venku Reddy, A. Raghava Reddy and A. Balarama Reddy, for effecting the partition. The arbitrators gave an award dividing the family assets and liabilities into four equal shares. 'A' schedule was allotted to the plaintiffs, 'B' schedule to Venkatarama Reddy and K. Sesha Reddy, 'C' schedule to the 1st defendant and 'D' schedule to...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›