Andhra Pradesh Court January 1954 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Doddipatla Kameswara Rao and ors. Vs. Tarametla Somanna and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-30-1954
Reported in: AIR1955AP212
(1) (After setting out the facts and, on an appreciation of the evidence, oral and documentary, confirming the findings of the trial Judge on all other points, His Lodship continued):(2) Thelearned Advocate for the respondents contended that as the Committee was formed only in December 1939, there coiuld be no adverse possession as against the Committee, till it was formed and the President and Secretary thereof elected.Artcile 134-B, Limitation Act runs in the following terms:Description of suit. Period of Time from which periodlimitation. begins to run.By the Manager of a Hindu, 12 years. The death, resignationMuhammadan or Buddist or removal of the religious or chartiable transferor.endowment to recover possession of immovableproperty comprised in theendowment which has beensold by a previous managerfor a valueable consideration. (3) As the plaintiffs now claim title by adverse possession, they msut show that their possession was adverse to the Committee and that they were in uninte...
The State Vs. Abdul Hafiz and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-1954
Reported in: 1955CriLJ1262
Siadat Ali Kuan J.1. This is a confirmation case. The Sessoins Judge, Hyderabad and Secunderabad, by judgment dated 31-7-1953, had convicted and sentenced the accused, Abdul Hafeez Khan, to death for the murder of one, Khulsum Bi, aged 5 and has. forwarded the file for confirmation. The accused has also appealed. Tho confirmation case is No, 483, register No. 6 of the same year. We have heard the arguments of the learned advocate, Shri Vasudeva Pillai, for the appellant and that of the learned Senior Government Advocate, Shri Mohd. Mirza for the State.2. The facts alleged by the prosecution are that on 14-2-1953 between 5-6 p. m., the accused carried away the tiny girl, Khulsum Bi, who was wearing some cheap gold and silver ornaments from Imambada locality, Yakutpura, removed the ornaments and threw the girl into a well; and that, later on, the same evening he sold the ornaments to one Sagarmal, P. W. 8 for Rs. 13. The First Information Report was issued on 15-12-1953 and reached the c...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›