Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court November 1953 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 11 1953

Konduri Mankayya Lingam Vs. Konduri Ram Lingam

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-11-1953

Reported in: 1954CriLJ656

ORDERSrinivasachari, J.1. These proceedings have arisen out of an application filed by Konduri Rama Lingam, respondent before me, before the Munsiff Magistrate, Huzurabad, under Section 145, Criminal P. C. The applicant alleged that himself and the second party, Konduri Mankayya Lingam were brothers running a factory by name Konduri yenkata Rajam and Brothers Rice Ginning and Oil Mills at Jammikunta under a registered partnership of which the petitioner and the respondent were the partners. He further alleged that, disputes having arisen, a notice of dissolution of the partnership was given by Konduri Mankayya Lingam and after that date the factory remained closed. He averred that the accounts of the partnership had to be settled and the assets and liabilities gone into. The applicant before the Magistrate alleged that he was in possession of the factory, the machinery etc. and that the other partner was out of possession.He made a statement that a portion of the factory had been requi...


Nov 09 1953

State of Hyderabad Vs. Mohd. Shakur and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-09-1953

Reported in: 1954CriLJ687

Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This is a reference by the District and Sessions Judge, Aurangabad for setting aside the order of discharge passed by the Additional Magistrate, Aurangabad. The accused was charged under 8. 379, I. P. C., for an offence alleged to have been committed on 6-9-1951, regarding which a challan was filed on 16-1-1952 along with a list of four witnesses whom the prosecution proposed to examine. On a perusal of the proceedings it appears that the learned Magistrate directed the issue of summonses to the witnesses on 31-1-1952. There after five adjournments were taken, viz., on 18-2-1952, 1-3-1952, 15-3-1952, 5-4-1952 and 18-4-1952 to serve the summonses on the prosecution witnesses, the Magistrate ordering, each time fresh summonses to be issued to them Because neither the summonses were returned, nor were the witnesses produced. On 2-5-1952, Fazullah the Investgating Officer and Maheswaram, Registrar of the P. B. College at which the theft had taken place, were examined...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial