Andhra Pradesh Court October 1953 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
AzizuddIn Ansari Vs. State of Hyderabad and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-29-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ528
Srinivasachari, J.1. This application by one Azizuddin Ansari is under Article 226, Constitution of India praying for an order in the nature of a Writ restraining the State of Hyderabad and the Police Commissioner from enforcing their orders calling upon the petitioner to go out of India. The Petitioner alleged that at the suggestion of some of his friends the Petitioner went to Pakistan in May 1950 for a pleasure trip; he returned to India via East Pakistan in June 1950. He further alleged that he was prosecuted under Section 5, Influx from Pakistan (Control) Act of 1949 for coming to India without a valid permit and was fined Rs. 200/- by the Chief City Magistrate of Hyderabad. He further averred that even after these proceedings were taken against him, he is being forced to go back to Pakistan by the Commissioner of Police. On these allegations the Petitioner has applied to this Court invoking our jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and prays that the State Government...
State of Hyderabad Vs. Kankadu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-28-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ651
Palnitkar, C.J.1. An interesting question of law as to the interpretation of Section 61, Criminal P. C., has arisen in this appeal against the order of acquittal passed by the Munsiff-Magistrate at Narayanpet.2. The brief facts of the case are that the accused, respondent, was arrested under the offence of committing rape under Section 376, Penal Code, on 24th June 1952, at 11-30 P. M. by the Sub-Inspector of Police at Narayanpet. He was kept in the lock-up. The Sub-Inspector of Police at 8 P.M. on the subsequent day (25-6-1952) sent the accused to the Magistrate at Narayanpet for remand orders. When the accused together with the escort reached the Magistrate's Court it was found that the Magistrate was on leave and the Sheristadar of the Magistrate's Court directed the escort to take the accused for the purposes of the remand to the District Magistrate at Mahbubnagar. It is alleged that when the said direction was given there was no train or bus available for taking the accused to Mah...
Venkatrao Vs. Rukminibai
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-27-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ1291
ORDERJaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Osmanabad for setting aside the proceedings under Section 488, Cr. P.C. which resulted in a maintenance of Rs. 100/- being awarded to the revision-petitioner's wife and four children. It appears that a petition was filed by Rukmini Bai, respondent, wife of the revision-petitioner on 26-7-1951 on behalf of herself & her four children alleging that the revision-petitioner though having sufficient means has been negligent and is refusing to maintain them. The revision-petitioner presented a petition through his vakil, Mr, Dattatreyarao on 25-8-1951, admitting Rukmini Bai to be his wife and the children to be his legitimate issues; but denying that he was either negligent or refused to maintain them. He further contended that he had insufficient means of livelihood. The proceedings show that notice was ordered to the respondent on 26th July under Section 488, Cr. P. C. and on the next date of hearing, i.e., 10...
Vadla Kistiah and ors. Vs. State of Hyderabad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-14-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ641
Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. These are four appeals by accused Vadla Kistiah, Kishen Singh, Gurrapu Ramiah and 'Aare Kistadu against the conviction and sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment awarded by the Special Judge, Nalgonda on 30-9-1950. The prosecution case is that one Nakkala Baliga, who is a member of the Communist Party which was carrying on depredations and unsocial activities, had demanded Rs, 2,000/- and two khandies of grain from deceased Mahaboob All who was the agent of a Jagirdar. Previous to this the cattle of the village had been taken away by Nakkala Baliga and his party and the villagers had to pay Rs. 200/- to get them back. When the demand for Rs. 2,000/- and 2 khandies of grain was made Mahaboob Ali promised to send word to the Jagirdar and asked them to wait for his reply. It is alleged that the deceased was threatened with some other kind of treatment if the amount was not paid. Inasmuch as no reply was forthcoming Nakkala Baliga, along with the four aforesaid a...
Ramarao Vs. Shivram and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ671
ORDERSrinivasachari, J.1. This is a revision petition arising, in proceedings under Section 145, Cr. P. C. The revision petitioner was the first party in the lower Court. The brief facts necessary for the determination of this revision petition are that an application was filed by the petitioner before the Magistrate in Theer 1357F. stating that the other party was interfering with his possession; that there was apprehension of breach of peace and, that, therefore, proceedings under Section 145, Cr. P. C., should be started. It is stated that the Magistrate passed an order directing the attachment of the suit land, on 24th Amardad 1357P. But the bailiff who went to execute the order of attachment submitted a report that it was not possible-to execute the warrant of attachment as the other party was threatening to use force. This was the state of affairs when the Police Action started and it was not until 28th May 1952 that this case saw the light of day. On the 28th of May 1952, the Ma...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›