Andhra Pradesh Court January 1953 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naimullah Khan Vs. State of Hyderabad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-1953
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1388
Srinivasa Chari, J.1. This second appeal in a criminal case was admitted alter notice to the Government Advocate. It was alleged that the accused who is the appellant before me took away one Khacher and Gouna from the house of one Rama when he was away and when his mother alone was present in the house. It is stated that when the mother protested against his taking away these things, he assured her that he would return the things the next day. It is also stated that the same accused took away a pair of bullocks from the house of one Mahboob in his absence. Later on, the accused is said to have disposed of these bullocks, the cart and Gouna to different persons, making it appear as though he was the owner of all these things. The accused was charged under Section 406, I.P.C. and the Magistrate on the evidence taken by him found him guilty and sentenced him to undergo one years rigorous imprisonment. On appeal the Sessions Judge of Adilabad came to, the conclusion that on the evidence th...
Bhagoji Vs. Hyderabad Govt.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-15-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ1378
Manohar Pershad, J.1. Bhagoji and Rabhaji are charged of the offences of murdering one Gangadhar and also for causing disappearance of the evidence of the murder under Sections 302 and 201, Indian Penal Code respectively. Prosecution story is that Malan Bai the full sister of A-1 and the niece of A-2 had lost her first husband during childhood, but on attaining puberty, she inclined towards remarriage on coming in contact with the deceased. The deceased belonged to the Jadhav family while the accused were from Bhonsla family. There had been few marriages of Bhonsla girls with Jadhav boys. The accused always felt that Jadhavas were not equal in status and when Malan Bai told the accused that she was going to marry the deceased, the accused objected strongly and did all in their power to stop her from taking this step. They even threatened that if she would marry, she would not be allowed to enjoy married life peacefully.2. But in spite of this, Malan Bai succeeded in having 'gandharv (r...
Abdullah and ors. Vs. Hanmanthappa
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-1953
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1862
ORDERSrinivasachari, J.1. This is a revision arising in proceedings under Section 148, Hyd. Criminal P.C. corresponding to Section 145, Indian Criminal P.C. The second party in the original proceedings being aggrieved by the order of the Magistrate holding that the first party was in possession of the suit land has preferred this revision. The Magistrate on the application of the first party who is the respondent before me came to the conclusion that there was apprehension of a breach of peace and passed an order to that effect on 29.3.1950. Immediately after, he took over the land under Government supervision pending enquiry. The parties were called upon to submit the statements with regard to their respective claims. After enquiry the Magistrate came to the conclusion that it was proved by evidence that the first party was in possession of the land on the date of the order and two months prior to that and, therefore, directed that the land that was taken under the supervision of the ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›