Andhra Pradesh Court February 1951 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Khaja Mian Vs. State of Hyderabad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-1951
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1136
1. This is an appeal against the conviction and sentence of the accused under Sections 11 and 14 of the Hyderabad Arms Regulation No. 13 of 1358 Fasli and a legal question has arisen.2. The facts briefly are that the accused was charge-sheeted for unlawfully keeping in possession one spear-head. The question arises whether the possession of the said weapon it an offence under the said Regulation. Section 10 of the said Regulation lays down that - no person shall have in his possession or under his control any cannon, fire arms, ammunition or Military stores, except under a licence and in the manner and to the extent permitted thereby.3. It is clear that the accused had neither a cannon nor fire-arms, nor ammunition, nor Military stores in his possession. It is only, the possession of these four categories of articles that has been prohibited unless under a licence by the Act. The spear-head in question in this case is not included in that category. Hence, the provisions of Section 10 d...
Sanjaila Khatoon W/O Muhammad Ibrahim Vs. the State of Hyderabad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-01-1951
Reported in: 1951CriLJ918
ORDER1. These are two applications for writs of habeas corpus : one by the wife, and another by the detenu himself from the jail. We are of opinion that these applications must succeed on the ground that the authorities concerned have not reviewed the case within six months as laid down by Sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Preventive Detention Act.2. The relevant dates in the case may be briefly narrated. The detenu was arrested on February 14, 1950, and on February 22, 1950, an order of detention under Act IV of 1950 was passed, which was served on the detenu on March, 14, 1950. The grounds of detention were however not communicated immediately. The document containing them is dated August 28, 1960 and was served on September 8,1950. Before reviewing the case, the authorities concerned sent the case to the Special Officer whom they wanted to consult. Time was taken in obtaining such an opinion which did not take place till after the representation against the grounds of detention w...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›