Allahabad Court November 2015 Judgments
Janpad Diwani Evam Faujdari Bar Association, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. t ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-27-2015
Rakesh Tiwari, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for the following reliefs. 1. "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 24.7.2015 passed by the Chairman, Bar Council of U.P. suspending the entire election programme of the Bar Association ; 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent nos. 2 and 3 not to interfere in election process of Bar Association and direct the elder committee and office bearers of the Bar Association to initiate and conclude the election of the Bar Association rescheduling its election programme afresh within a very reasonable time to be specified by this Court ; 3. Issue any other writ, order or direction, which this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case ; and 4. Award cost of the petition to the petitioners." 3. Brief facts of the case are that peti...
Tag this Judgment!Manas Sewa Samiti Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-02-2015
Tarun Agarwala, J. 1. The petitioner is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act. The petitioner has various objects. One such object is to establish an educational institution. In the year 2001-02, the petitioner established an educational institution in the name and style of Institute of Information Management and Technology at Ramghat road at Aligarh. This institution is affiliated to Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University, Agra. Prior to the assessment year 2007-08, the total receipts was below the monetary limit of Rs. 10 crores. As such, the petitioner fell under Section 10(23C) (iiiad) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The returns were filed accordingly which were accepted by the department and the petitioner- society was declared non taxable. 2. For the assessment year 2007-08, the petitioner filed its return showing an income of Rs.86,81,911/-, which was not accepted. The Assessing Officer found that the income of the petitioner was above R...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›