Allahabad Court December 2014 Judgments
Shakuntala Educational and Welfare Society and Others Vs. Punjab and S ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
Tarun Agarwala, J. 1. The petitioners have established an education institution and, for this purpose, the petitioner No.1 has availed certain credit facilities from the respondent-Banks through multiple Banking arrangement, namely, from Punjab and Sind Bank, Allahabad Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce and Dena Bank. Credit facilities was sanctioned by the respondent-Banks by way of hypothecation charge on the current assets, other fixed assets in favour of the Banks. Credit facilities so granted was also secured by way of equitable mortgage of immovable properties. The credit facilities so sanctioned by the Banks have been utilized for the development of the University and other colleges. On account of expansion of their project, certain cash flow problems arose for petitioner No.1 presumably on account of expenses incurred towards infrastructure development. The petitioner No. 1, accordingly, could not repay the loan amount as per the schedule of payments. The Reserve Bank of India (RB...
Tag this Judgment!Neelam and Others Vs. Nawab Ahamad and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
Dinesh Gupta, J. Heard learned counsel for the claimants/appellants and perused the record. 2. Claim Petition No. 23 of 2009 was filed by the claimants/appellants against Nawab Ahmad and others, claiming compensation for the death of Vijay Kumar Agarwal in a road accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bulandshahr, vide judgment and award dated 14.9.2010, dismissed the claim petition on the ground that the claimants have failed to establish that accident had occurred due to carelessness of driver of Santro Car No. H.R. 25A.J./8972. 3. Not being satisfied with the judgment and award dated 14.9.2010, claimants/appellants have filed a Review Petition, bearing No. 18 of 2010, seeking review of the judgment and award dated 14.9.2010. The Tribunal, after hearing the parties and perusing the evidence on record, dismissed the review petition vide judgment and order dated 26.9.2014, which is impugned in the instant appeal, holding that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has no power to re...
Tag this Judgment!Biran Lal Gupta Vs. Deputy General Manager Zonal Office, B.O.B. and Ot ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
This special appeal is from a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 22 September 2014. While dismissing the petition the learned Single Judge has specifically recorded a finding that the petition was filed on the basis of false averments and by setting up misleading facts; that the appellant continued in service even after attaining the age of superannuation on 13 September 2009 on the strength of an interim order which was obtained on the basis of a material suppression and that, in consequence, it would be open to the employer bank to recover the salary paid to the appellant with effect from 1 October 2009. The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed with costs quantified at Rs.1 lac. The appellant was appointed on 24 August 1982 by the Bank of Baroda as a Class-IV employee. A charge sheet was issued to the appellant on 7 December 1993 alleging that he had submitted a school leaving certificate of C.A.V. Inter College, Allahabad stating that h...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›