Allahabad Court October 2014 Judgments
Sheo Poojan Prasad Tewari Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents. The petitioner herein was appointed as library attendant under the relevant Rules/ Government Orders. There is a provision for promotion of class-IV employees, such as library attendant, to the class-III post under 15% quota prescribed for them. However, the said promotion is to be made subject to certain terms and conditions including holding of an examination. Promotions are made as per seniority subject to rejection. In this case, the petitioner who was working on the class-IV post, was promoted as junior clerk on 19.01.1995. On 13.03.1995, the Deputy Director of Education passed an order to the effect that the petitioner had been illegally promoted. The D.I.O.S. submitted his explanation to the letter of the Deputy Director of Education on 16.03.1995. However, in the meantime, the petitioner filed a writ petition bearing No.11776 of 1995 challenging the order of Deputy Director of Educati...
Tag this Judgment!Pankaj Singh Vs. State of U.P. Thru Its Secy. (Secondary Edu.) and Ano ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-17-2014
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. This writ petition was initially filed against the show cause notice dated 17.3.2009 to which the petitioner had replied on 24.3.2009. However, during pendency of the writ petition an order was passed on 31.3.2009 which is placed on record as Annexure-CA-1 to the counter affidavit. The petitioner filed an application for amendment seeking to challenge the order dated 31.3.2009 which was allowed by order dated 17.9.2014. A counter affidavit had already been filed and the question involved in the writ petition being a pure question of law, as such, further time for filing any supplementary counter affidavit by the learned standing counsel against the amendment application was not warranted. The writ petition was heard on merit and learned standing counsel has argued on the basis of documents placed on record along with the counter affidavit. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner participated in the selection...
Tag this Judgment!The National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Asha Pachauri and Another
Court: Allahabad Lucknow
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
Vishnu Chandra Gupta, J. This appeal under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the EC Act') has been filed against the judgment and award dated 22.09.2010 passed by Workman Compensation Commissioner and Deputy Labour Commissioner, Lucknow Region, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commissioner') in WCP No.33 of 2008, whereby the Commissioner has awarded compensation of Rs.3,98,800/- to the claimant Smt. Asha Pachauri on account of death of his son Praveen Pachauri, who died in a mother accident occurred on 18.08.2008 at about 5:30 a.m., when the deceased was driving auto rickshaw under the employment of respondent no.2 Neeraj Pachauri, the bother of the deceased. The brief facts for deciding this first appeal from order are that respondent no.2 Neeraj Pachauri owned an auto rickshaw having Registration No.UP 32-BN 7074. According to him, the auto rickshaw was driven by him in day time and the same was given to the deceased to be driven...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›