Allahabad Court February 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pradeep Singh Alias Sunil Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2011
1. The applicant, his father and his mother along with other co-accused are alleged to have abetted the suicide of the deceased and there is a further allegation on the applicant that he has also committed the offence of rape. Needless to mention that the mother of the applicant has been bailed out on 18.11.2010 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.32008 of 2010 and father of the applicant has also been bailed out on 22.12.2010 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.35094 of 2010. The applicant discloses himself to be working in a private firm at Lucknow and he is not involved in any other criminal case so as to dis-entitle him to pray for bail. 2. Sri L.M. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that this was a case which prima facie indicated a relationship between the applicant and the victim, who wanted to live together and the victim who belongs to an inferior caste having failed to get the blessings of her guardians, was allegedly assaulted and done to death by her kith...
irfan Ali Vs. Akhil Bharat Manav Sansthan Mandal Anand Niketan and Ano ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2011
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The facts in brief are that JSSC Suit No. 59 of 2007 was filed by plaintiff respondent no.1 for arrears of rent and ejectment from godown no.2 Eastern side situated near gate no.2 Anand Niketan Market, Bareilly against the petitioner. 3. The defendant petitioner filed his written statement controverting the allegations made in the plaint. An application under Order 15 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure was filed by the plaintiff for striking off the defence against which no objection was filed by the defendant petitioner. The trial Court/Judge Small Causes Court, Bareilly vide order dated 10.6.2010 allowed the application directing striking off the defence of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order dated 10.6.2010, the petitioner filed representation, which too was rejected by the Court below vide order dated 30.8.2010, against which revision was filed by the petitioner before the court of District Judge, B...
State of U.P. and Others. Vs. C.P. Ravindra Singh and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-01-2011
1. Since all the aforesaid special appeals are identically placed as are arising out of similar orders of learned Single Judge, the same have been heard analogously and decided by this common judgement and order, which will have binding effect in all the special appeals. 2. The appellants herein are either Constables and/or Head Constables and/or Sub-Inspectors in the Uttar Pradesh Police. They, by means of their respective writ petitions challenged their orders of transfer taking a common plea that when the Police Establishment Board as per the direction of the Supreme Court in 2006 (8) SCC 1 (Prakash Singh and others v. Union of India and others) has not been properly constituted by the State, the transfer orders are illegal in nature, therefore, no effect of the same can be given. Learned Single Judge, by the respective orders impugned in these appeals, allowed the writ petitions and set aside the orders of transfer. Against such orders of learned Single Judge, the State of Uttar Pr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›