Allahabad Court January 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Dularey Prasad Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2011
1. We have heard Shri C.B. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the State respondents. 2. The petitioner is challenging the order dated 11.3.2011 by which the second promotional pay scale allowed to him on 29.8.2003 has been cancelled, and the consequential recovery of the difference of pay is to be made from the petitioner's retiral dues. He has also prayed for quashing the order dated 25.3.2001 passed by the Additional Director, (Treasury and Pension)-respondent no. 6, and for directions to respondents to make the payment of pension in the grade of Rs.8000-275-13500, as per letter dated 29.8.2003. He has also prayed for payment of gratuity on the aforesaid pay scale and the revision of the payment of retiral dues. 3. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Agriculture Inspector-a Class III post in the Department of Agriculture, Government of U.P., on 17.8.1968. He received his first promotion as Assistant Development Officer (Agricul...
U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Smt. Urmila Devi
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2011
1. A petition, being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 20938 of 2002, was filed by Smt.Urmila Devi, respondent herein, daughter-in-law of the deceased Kishun Lal, who died in harness on 21.04.1999. Kishun Lal, at the time of his death, was employed as Painter in the Electricity Transmission Division II of the U.P. Power Corporation, Allahabad. Anil Kumar, husband of the respondent predeceased his father. Late Kishun Lal was survived by the respondent herein and two children, i.e. one son and one daughter. After the death of Kishun Lal, his daughter-in-law Urmila Devi, respondent herein, applied for compassionate appointment, which was declined by order dated 22.04.2002 on the premise that she did not fall within the definition of ?family? as given under the U.P. State Electricity Board Dying in Harness Rules, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'). That order was the subject matter of consideration before the learned Single Judge in the writ petition. The learned Single Judge, after...
Smt. Girja Shanker W.O. Late Girja Shanker and ors. Vs. Krishna Kumar ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2011
1. Heard Srii Mohd. Shakeel, counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the order dated 07.10.2010 (Annexure-1) passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 10, Luckbnow in SCC Revision No. 129 of 2008 Raju Sharma and others v. Krishna Kumar Jaiswal and others as well as judgment and decree dated 11.11.2008 (Annexure-2) passed by Judge, Small Causes Court, Lucknow in SCC No. 184 of 2005 Krishna Kumar Jaiswal v. Raju Sharma and others are under challenge. 3. Controversy in the present case relates to a shop under the tenancy of petitioner situated at building No. 260/84, Aishbag, Lucknow. East : Shop No. 3 West : Shop No. 1 North : Road South : Remaining Residential Portion of plaintiff's house. 4. In respect to the same, Sri Krishan Kumar Jaiswal/respondent filed a suit for arrears of rent and eviction and change of use, under the provisions of Small Cause Courts Act, ...
Preeti Sharma and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2011
1. We have heard Shri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the respondents. 2. By this writ petition the petitioners have prayed for direction to the respondents to accept the petitioner's application form of Combined State/ Upper Subordinate Service Examination, 2011 to be conducted by the U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad and to make their candidature subject to the decision of Public Interest Litigation No.1980 of 2011, Swaraj Sewa Sansthan v. State of U.P. & Ors. 3. Rule 2 of the U.P. Recruitment in Service (Age Limit) Rules, 1972 provides for the upper age limit of 35 years for recruitment to all public services in the State of U.P. under the rule making powers of the Governor. Rule 6 provides that a candidate must have attained the minimum age and must not have attained the maximum age as prescribed from time to time on the first day of July of the calender year in which the vacancies for direct recruitment are ...
Ms Allahabad Traders Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-25-2011
1. On conclusion of the hearing on 21.1.2011, we had expressed our opinion of allowing the writ petition. The reasons for allowing the same are contained in the judgment and order herein below: 2. Petitioner M/s Allahabad Traders through one of its partner has filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 15.9.2010 passed by the Regional Food Controller, Allahabad Region, Allahabad cancelling the petitioner's registration with the department and directing it to be placed in the black list. 3. The petitioner is a Contractor registered with the office of the Regional Food Controller, Allahabad Region, Allahabad and is engaged in the business of transport. 4. In the year 2008-2009, the petitioner was entrusted with the transportation of 29693.20 quintal of custom paddy from the Purchase Centre, Manjhanpur for the purpose of hulling to Rakesh Mini Rice Mill (in short 'Mill') situate in Manjhanpur itself. It is alleged that the petitioner performed the above work. On the certificate ...
Kribhco Shyam Fertilizers Limited, a 10, Sector 1, Kribhco Bhawan, Noi ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-25-2011
1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the following reliefs : (a) "Issue an appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature of certiorari and/or otherwise passing an order to quash the impugned order dated 28.11.2008 by the respondent no. 3 in stamp appeal no. 152 of 2006-07 whereby the order under appeal dated 12.12.2006 passed by respondent no. 2 has been upheld and consequently also quash the demand of excess stamp duty, penal interest @1.5% per month and the penalty thereon; (b) Issue appropriate directions declaring that the stamp duty is payable only on the immovable property mentioned in the sale/conveyance deed dated 31.10.2006; (c) Issue an appropriate writ/order and/or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Collector/ADM to reassess/recompute the correct stamp duty in accordance to law; (d) Issue a consequent writ of mandamus or otherwise commanding the respondent to refund the excess stamp duty, penalty and interest (charged be...
Dharam Raj Singh S.O Late Lal Sahab Singh Vs. State of U.P. Thru Prin. ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-25-2011
1. Heard Sri S.C. Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Sudeep Seth, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record. 2. Affidavits have been exchanged between the parties. 3. With the consent of the parties' counsel, the writ petition is finally heard and is being decided at admission stage. 4. Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved of the impugned order dated 24.08.2009 (Annexure-1) by which the petitioner has been dismissed from service after disciplinary proceedings. 5. While serving as Dy. General Manger in the respondent Bank at Banda the petitioner was served with a charge-sheet dated 12th February, 2008, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure No. 10 to the writ petition. While serving the chargesheet, 9 charges relating to slackness and misconduct were levelled against the petitioner. After receipt of the chargesheet, the petitioner vide letter dated 22th February, 2008, demanded c...
Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P., Lu ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-24-2011
1. his is a revision under Section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act (called the 'Act' for short) against the order of the Tribunal dated 22.11.2006 relating to the assessment year 2002-03. 2. The applicant is a Public Limited Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 (called the '1956 Act' for brevity). It is registered under the Act and under the Central Sales Tax Act (herein after referred to as the 'Central Act') and is carrying on the business of manufacture and sales of sugar, molasses, rectified spirit, denatured spirit, extra neutral alcohol, country liquor and Indian made foreign liquor. 3. In the present revision the dispute relates to the levy of tax on the turnover of extra neutral alcohol (ENA). The claim of the applicant is that ENA is 'Alcohol' and is liable to tax under the United Provinces Sale of Motor Spirit, Diesel Oil and Alcohol Taxation Act, 1939 (called the '1939 Act' for short) as amended by the U.P. Sales of Motor Spirit, Diesel Oil and Alcohol Taxa...
Dr. (Mrs) Shagupta MoIn and anr. Vs. Aligarh Muslim University, Aligar ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-24-2011
1. Heard Shri Ravi Kant, Senior Counsel assisted by Shri S.A. Murtaza for the petitioners. Smt. Sunita Agrawal appears for Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. Shri M.C. Tripathi appears for respondent No.3. Shri B.D. Mandhyan, Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Satish Mandhyan appears for the respondent No.4. Shri Ashok Khare, Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Faheem Ahmad appears for the respondent No.5. 2. Dr. (Mrs.) Shagupta Moin (petitioner No.1) and Dr. Abdul Faiz Faizy (petitioner No.2) are M.B.B.S. and M.D. in Bio-Chemistry from the Department of Bio-Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh of the Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. They were appointed as Lecturers in the same Faculty of the Medical College and are presently serving as Readers (now designated as Associate Professor) in Bio-Chemistry in the same department. Their degrees are known as Degrees in Medical Bio-Chemistry. 3. Dr. M.U. Siddhiqui-respondent No.2; Dr. Khushtar A. Salman-respon...
Ms. Sejwar Traders Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Tax, U.P., Lucknow.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-24-2011
1. This revision is under Section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act (called the 'Act' for short) against the order of the Tribunal dated 19.8.2010 for the assessment year 2004-05. 2. During the year under consideration the applicant has purchased goat raw hide and skins from the unregistered dealer and, after getting it tanned on job work basis, sold the same to M/s. Shalimar Trading Company, Chennai, claimed to be exporter. In respect of the aforesaid sale three Form 'H' have been submitted. Copies of the bill of ladding have also been furnished. The applicant claimed exemption on the purchases of raw hides from unregistered dealer and also on the sales to the alleged exporter on the ground that such purchases preceded to the export sale and it was in the course of export. 3. The assessing authority rejected the claim of exemption on the ground that in Form "H" the order number and date of the foreign buyer was not mentioned. The goods, which was mentioned in Form 'H' and the bill of laddi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »