Allahabad Court August 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ghanshyam, and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.). and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-02-2010
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned Additional Government Advocate. 2. The argument substantially is that fraught relation emanating from matrimonial bickering escalated into launching of criminal proceeding vide F.I.R. which was registered at Case Crime No.681 of 2010, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Doodhayein, District Sant Kabir Nagar. 3. Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, we have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand also appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties. 4. While referring the matter to Mediation Centre with the consent of the petitioners, it is directed that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the Mediation Centre ...
Tinku, and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.). and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-02-2010
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned Additional Government Advocate. 2. The argument substantially is that fraught relations emanating from matrimonial bickering escalated into launching of criminal proceeding vide Case Crime No. 541 of 2010 under Sections 498-A, 323 and 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act P.S. Katghar district Moradabad. 3. Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, we have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand also appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties. 4. While referring the matter to Mediation Centre with the consent of the petitioners, it is directed that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the Mediation Centre by way of Bank draft drawn in favour of M...
Vivek MalwA. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.). and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-02-2010
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned Additional Government Advocate. 2. The argument substantially is that fraught relation emanating from matrimonial bickering escalated into launching of criminal proceeding vide Case Crime No.362 of 2010 under Sections 498-A, 452, 323, 504, 506, 307 and 406 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act P.S. 3. Nehtaur, district Bijnor. Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, we have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand also appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties. 4. While referring the matter to Mediation Centre with the consent of the petitioners, it is directed that the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the Mediation Centre by way of Bank draft draw...