Court : Allahabad
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the Staterespondent. The present 482 Petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 21.07.2010 passed in criminal case no. 3415 of 2009 (Satpal v. State of U.P.) in case crime no. 832 of 2009 under sections 406, 420, 506 IPC pending before the 1st A.C.J.M., Ghaziabad and also for quashing of the cognizance taken order dated 01.09.2009 and the order dated 07.07.2009 issuing nonbailable warrant against the applicants 2, It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the matter is purely of civil nature and the discharge application of the applicants has been dismissed by the concerned Magistrate by order dated 18.01.2010, which is bad in law. 3. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
1. The appellant is a borrower. He took a loan from the respondent State Bank of India, Branch Dibai, to the tune of Rs. 2 Lacs for the purchase of a Tractor. The appellant admittedly defaulted in making repayment of the said agricultural loan that was disbursed in the year 2001. Consequently, recovery proceedings were initiated and a Citation of recovery was issued for recovery of the amount of loan as arrears of land revenue under the provisions of the U.P Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 read with the 1952 Rules.2. The challenge in the writ petition giving rise to this appeal was to the Citation of recovery dated 3.4.2010 whereby a sum of Rs. 2,17,000/- was sought to be recovered together with 10% recovery charges. The learned single Judge upon the concession made by the appellant petitioner that he is ready to pay the entire amount of loan with interest in easy installments, proceeded to pass an order on 25.5.2010 fixing the time period for the repayment and if the said...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad Lucknow
1. Heard Sri D.D. Chopra, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the respondent and perused record.2. Since common question of law are involved in both the appeals, with the consent of parties counsel, we proceed to decide present appeals by the present common judgment.3. The respondent assessee, a Company, runs a Hospital at Sitapur Road, Lucknow. The income tax returns for the assessment year 1998-99 and 1999-2000 were filed showing loss of Rs.221974.00 which was processed under Section 143 (1) of the Income Tax Act (In short the Act). The assessment for both the assessment years, were reopened under Section 148 of the Act and notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued on 8.3.2002. A notice under Section 142 (1) was also issued on 28.1.2003 and the assessment was completed under Section 147/148 of the Act on 13.3.2003 on the total income of Rs.27,44,310.00 and Rs.27,54,870.00 for both years. The assessee preferred appeal which w...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. 2. The argument substantially is that fraught relation emanating from matrimonial bickering escalated into launching of criminal proceeding vide F.I.R. which was registered at case crime No.288 of 2010, under Sections 498A,323,504,506 and 313 IPC and 3/4 of D.P.Act, P.S.Kachhwa,, District Mirzapur.3. Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, we have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand also appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties.4. While referring the matter to Mediation Centre with the consent of the petitioners, it is directed that petitioner No.1 shall deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with the Mediation Centre by way of Bank draft drawn in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. 2. The argument substantially is that fraught relation emanating from matrimonial bickering escalated into launching of criminal proceeding vide F.I.R. which was registered at case crime No.49/182 of 2010, under Sections 498-A,307,323,324,504 and 506 IPC and 3/4 of D.P.Act, P.S. Inchauli, District Meerut.3. Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, we have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand also appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties.4. While referring the matter to Mediation Centre with the consent of the petitioners, it is directed that petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with the Mediation Centre by way of Bank draft drawn ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and also learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. The argument substantially is that fraught relation emanating from matrimonial bickering escalated into launching of criminal proceeding vide F.I.R. which was registered at case crime No.756 of 2010, under Sections 498-A,323,506 IPC and 3/4 D.P.Act, P.S. Shamli, District Muzafrar Nagar.2. Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, we have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand also appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties.3. While referring the matter to Mediation Centre with the consent of the petitioners, it is directed that petitioner No.1 shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the Mediation Centre by way...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned Addl. Government Advocate. The argument substantially is that fraught relation emanating from matrimonial bickering escalated into launching of criminal proceeding vide Case Crime No. 904 of 2010 under section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act police station Madhuban District Mau. 2. Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, we have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand also appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties.3. While referring the matter to Mediation Centre with the consent of the petitioners, it is directed that petitioner No.1 shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the Mediation Centre by way of Bank draft drawn in favour of Mediation Centre, High Cou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned Addl. Government Advocate. The argument substantially is that fraught relation emanating from matrimonial bickering escalated into launching of criminal proceeding vide Case Crime No. 241 of 2010 under section 498-A, 323, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act police station Afzalgarh District Bijnor. 2. Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, we have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand also appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties.3. While referring the matter to Mediation Centre with the consent of the petitioners, it is directed that petitioner No.1 shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the Mediation Centre by way of Bank draft drawn in favour of Mediation Cent...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and also learned Addl. Government Advocate. The argument substantially is that fraught relation emanating from matrimonial bickering escalated into launching of criminal proceeding vide Case Crime No. .1175 of 2010 under Sections 498-A, 494, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act P.S. Kotwali, district Mau. 2. Having considered the arguments advanced across the bar, we have a feeling that Court owes a duty to the society to strain to the utmost to repair the frayed relations between the parties so that the wounded situation may be healed into a healthy rapprochement. The matter in hand also appears to be one of those cases in which reconciliation should be tried between the disputing parties.3. While referring the matter to Mediation Centre with the consent of the petitioners, it is directed that petitioner No.1 shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the Mediation Centre by way of Bank draft drawn in favour of Medi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
1. Application for amendment filed in Court is taken on record. Shri Asok Pandey, a practising lawyer of this Court, has filed this writ petition by way of Public Interest Litigation with the following 3 prayers:(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to appoint long tenure (with) bold Judges in the office of the Chief Justice of the High Court and to fix the tenure of the Chief justice of the High Court on the pattern of fixation of tenure (fixed tenure) for the office of President, Governor etc.;(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to appoint ..... the Acting Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court as a permanent Chief Justice of High Court, and(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to ensure filling of vacant posts of Judges of the Allahabad High Court in a time bound manner. 2. Having been pointed out tha...
Tag this Judgment!