Allahabad Court June 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Lal S/O Late Eric Lal. Vs. State of U P Thr.its Prin.Secy.Home ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-22-2010
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Government Advocate.2. Under challenge in the instant writ petition is the FIR relating to Case Crime No.174 of 2010 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Bakshi Ka Talab, District Lucknow. We have gone through the contents of FIR as well as other documents annexed thereto. Petitioner no.1 happens to be the husband of opposite party no.4 Smt. Baubina Dass. The allegation with respect to maltreatment and harassment has been alleged by opposite party no.4 against her in-laws.3. Argument of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is nothing serious in the FIR which prohibits the parties in reconciling the matter if chance is taken for sending it to the Mediation Centre. It has further been asserted that the entire family has been roped without there being any justification or valid reason. There seems substance in the argument of the learned couns...
Vishwesh Nath. Vs. State of U.P. and Others.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-22-2010
1. Counter affidavit filed by the State is taken on record. Heard Mr.Raghvendra Kumar Singh, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Anurag Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Sanjay Bhasin, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Mr.Vinod Kumar Singh, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Ashok Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for opposite party No.4. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 8th of June, 2010, issued by the State Government, whereby in exercise of power provided under Section 21-A of U.P.Kshettra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Adhiniyam, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') the State Government has appointed a three member committee to discharge the functions of Adhyaksha of Zila Panchayat. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier three member committee was appointed to discharge the function of Adhyaksha of Zila Panchayat in exercise of power provided under Section 29 of the Act during the course of enquiry. Though on the re...
Kailash Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-21-2010
1. Present writ petition has been filed for quashing of the First Information Report registered at case crime No. 85 of 2010, under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, at police station Jamunapar, District Mathura.2. Brief background of the case is that Food Inspector (Nagar) Mathura, on 25.02.2010 at about 10.15. A.M., after introducing himself, inspected the shop of the petitioner and asked him to show the licence. During the course of visit, Food Inspector purchased Laddoos, took sample and sealed the same. Said sample was sent to Public Analyst, Lucknow. In the said sample on examination, non-permitted synthetic colour (Auramine) was found which was injurious to public health and not fit for consumption. Under the orders of the Commissioner, Food and Medicine Administration, U.P. directives were given for lodging First Information Report, and accordingly, First Information Report was lodged. After t...